SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Hold ip

Créé par: sharcuda22
Équipe: 2024-25 Sharks de San Jose
Date de création initiale: 8 janv. 2024
Publié: 8 janv. 2024
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
1950 000 $
21 500 000 $
21 500 000 $
1950 000 $
11 000 000 $
1950 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
33 500 000 $
Transactions
1.
SJS
  1. Kuzmenko, Andrei
  2. Choix de 3e ronde en 2024 (VAN)
VAN
  1. Choix de 2e ronde en 2024 (NJD)
Détails additionnels:
Duclair
2.
SJS
  1. Broberg, Philip [Droits de RFA]
  2. Campbell, Jack
  3. Choix de 2e ronde en 2024 (EDM)
  4. Choix de 1e ronde en 2025 (EDM)
EDM
  1. Rutta, Jan
Détails additionnels:
Khak
Rachats de contrats
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Enfoui
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2024
Logo de SJS
Logo de PIT
Logo de SJS
Logo de EDM
Logo de VAN
Logo de VGK
Logo de PIT
Logo de SJS
Logo de NJD
2025
Logo de SJS
Logo de EDM
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de WPG
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de WSH
2026
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2387 700 000 $68 372 500 $0 $1 307 500 $19 327 500 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
AG
RFA - 2
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
6 750 000 $6 750 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 6
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
5 500 000 $5 500 000 $
AG, AD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
828 333 $828 333 $ (Bonis de performance57 500 $$58K)
AG
RFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
8 000 000 $8 000 000 $
C
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
AD, AG
UFA
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
950 000 $950 000 $
C, AG
RFA
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
1 450 000 $1 450 000 $
AD
RFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
950 000 $950 000 $
AD, AG
RFA
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
C
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
AD, C
RFA
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
DG
RFA
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
1 250 000 $1 250 000 $
DD
UFA - 2
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
2 350 000 $2 350 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
3 250 000 $3 250 000 $
DG
UFA - 2
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
950 000 $950 000 $
DG
RFA
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
G
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
894 167 $894 167 $ (Bonis de performance400 000 $$400K)
DG
RFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
DD
RFA
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
800 000 $800 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
1 100 000 $1 100 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 2
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
7 000 000 $7 000 000 $
DG/DD
M-NTC
UFA - 2

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
8 janv. à 17 h 50
#1
PDG over PDO
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2020
Messages: 5,071
Mentions "j'aime": 4,117
Canucks pass
Vancity2196 a aimé ceci.
8 janv. à 17 h 53
#2
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2022
Messages: 3,789
Mentions "j'aime": 1,208
Both trades declined.
8 janv. à 18 h 4
#3
Stovetop
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2017
Messages: 2,004
Mentions "j'aime": 877
I want absolutely nothing to with Kuzmenko. Dude has not looked good this year, is insanely 1-dimentional, and seems to not respond to what VAN coaching staff needs him to do. Not worth giving up assets for at all.

I'm also insanely against taking on Campbell
8 janv. à 18 h 11
#4
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2018
Messages: 3,929
Mentions "j'aime": 2,065
I would do that Vancouver deal
8 janv. à 18 h 26
#5
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2021
Messages: 225
Mentions "j'aime": 23
What would Emberson cost? 3rd or 4th?
8 janv. à 18 h 57
#6
Mac1010
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2018
Messages: 1,690
Mentions "j'aime": 730
Quoting: AStovetop
I want absolutely nothing to with Kuzmenko. Dude has not looked good this year, is insanely 1-dimentional, and seems to not respond to what VAN coaching staff needs him to do. Not worth giving up assets for at all.

I'm also insanely against taking on Campbell


I am going to guess he would take on campbell to buy him out and get 3 assets for him...
I dont think EDM would do this as they would just buy him out in the summer. only way they trade him and give up assets is if they have another big trade bringing in someone and need the space.
Rob32sjsharks a aimé ceci.
8 janv. à 19 h 15
#7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2020
Messages: 11,284
Mentions "j'aime": 4,686
Quoting: AStovetop
I want absolutely nothing to with Kuzmenko. Dude has not looked good this year, is insanely 1-dimentional, and seems to not respond to what VAN coaching staff needs him to do. Not worth giving up assets for at all.

I'm also insanely against taking on Campbell


Campbell if the right assets come with him is fine! We have more than enough cap and could just dump him in the AHL and he’ll if the rebounds maybe make him the backup!

Kuzmenko scored 39 goals last year and was a stud, I think the big issue is the new coaching staff in Vancouver play a style that doesn’t fit his, who cares cause Vancouver is killing it but we play a style more like they did last year and it’s not a lot to take a risk in him. Plus Barbi and Kuzmenko would compliment each other and should have good to great chemistry!
sharcuda22 a aimé ceci.
8 janv. à 19 h 16
#8
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2020
Messages: 11,284
Mentions "j'aime": 4,686
Quoting: mm1010
I am going to guess he would take on campbell to buy him out and get 3 assets for him...
I dont think EDM would do this as they would just buy him out in the summer. only way they trade him and give up assets is if they have another big trade bringing in someone and need the space.


That’s the hope and it’s more like 2 assets! And his cap hit won’t hurt the sharks next year or 25! Worse case he’s the AHL starter.
8 janv. à 19 h 17
#9
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2020
Messages: 11,284
Mentions "j'aime": 4,686
Quoting: Rob88
What would Emberson cost? 3rd or 4th?


He is literally our best RD by a wide margin and playing really strong with Ferraro, I’d say not for sale and keep him!
sharcuda22 a aimé ceci.
8 janv. à 19 h 19
#10
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2020
Messages: 11,284
Mentions "j'aime": 4,686
Quoting: sedin33
I would do that Vancouver deal


Quoting: Vancity2196
Both trades declined.


Quoting: theleano1
Canucks pass


This isn’t the deal but I’m sure there is one we could all work out! I want Kuzmenko on the sharks as our style fits what you guys did last year vs what you guys are doing this year and he doesn’t really fit your game anymore!

Granlund really fits your guys game well but not sure you guys want him. What would you guys say is fair?

Otherwise we just sign him in 25 hehehe
8 janv. à 19 h 26
#11
Démarrer sujet
sharcuda22
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2022
Messages: 1,775
Mentions "j'aime": 555
Quoting: Rob32sjsharks
This isn’t the deal but I’m sure there is one we could all work out! I want Kuzmenko on the sharks as our style fits what you guys did last year vs what you guys are doing this year and he doesn’t really fit your game anymore!

Granlund really fits your guys game well but not sure you guys want him. What would you guys say is fair?

Otherwise we just sign him in 25 hehehe


Just this happy. I was picturing a scenario where there is even worse fall out with the coach by march so it was kind of a might as well get something for him for the play off run
Rob32sjsharks a aimé ceci.
8 janv. à 19 h 34
#12
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2020
Messages: 11,284
Mentions "j'aime": 4,686
Quoting: sharcuda22
Just this happy. I was picturing a scenario where there is even worse fall out with the coach by march so it was kind of a might as well get something for him for the play off run

We could hope!
I would trade our 2nd in 24 plus Duclair 50% retained for him though! At 27/28 he would be a nice middle 6 with potential to play the top line and will still be in his prime when the sharks are starting to fight for playoffs! And this draft isn’t the strongest so the % we get someone better in the 33-35 range is slim.
Plus Russian wings for Couture in Barbi Kuzmenko might be a real fun line to watch
sharcuda22 a aimé ceci.
9 janv. à 18 h 42
#13
Mac1010
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2018
Messages: 1,690
Mentions "j'aime": 730
Quoting: Rob32sjsharks
That’s the hope and it’s more like 2 assets! And his cap hit won’t hurt the sharks next year or 25! Worse case he’s the AHL starter.


Broberg is an asset and as longs your team can draft which how they have been tanking hopefully they have the team for it. 1st and 2nd round hit
9 janv. à 19 h 49
#14
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2020
Messages: 11,284
Mentions "j'aime": 4,686
Quoting: mm1010
Broberg is an asset and as longs your team can draft which how they have been tanking hopefully they have the team for it. 1st and 2nd round hit


You look at the last few drafts 20-23 and sharks have gotten decent value in the first 2 rounds and found a few kids in the later rounds who could wind up being good finds/ hidden gems.
10 janv. à 14 h 0
#15
Mac1010
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2018
Messages: 1,690
Mentions "j'aime": 730
Quoting: Rob32sjsharks
You look at the last few drafts 20-23 and sharks have gotten decent value in the first 2 rounds and found a few kids in the later rounds who could wind up being good finds/ hidden gems.


I wasnt saying they were bad. just saying that why its 3 assets broberg 1st and 2nd rounder's. thats 3
10 janv. à 14 h 12
#16
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2020
Messages: 11,284
Mentions "j'aime": 4,686
Quoting: mm1010
I wasnt saying they were bad. just saying that why its 3 assets broberg 1st and 2nd rounder's. thats 3

Oh sorry I misread that. Borberg would be great if the sharks are planning on moving Ferraro for assets at the TDL but if not sharks have Thrun Okhotiyuk Mukhamadulin and Ferraro (and Furlong + Cagnioni still developing) at LD so they are kinda set there. I think sharks would want Bourgault as RW is a weaker position both in NHL and development wise.
But again if this was available sharks should pounce on it.
10 janv. à 14 h 19
#17
Démarrer sujet
sharcuda22
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2022
Messages: 1,775
Mentions "j'aime": 555
Quoting: Rob32sjsharks
Oh sorry I misread that. Borberg would be great if the sharks are planning on moving Ferraro for assets at the TDL but if not sharks have Thrun Okhotiyuk Mukhamadulin and Ferraro (and Furlong + Cagnioni still developing) at LD so they are kinda set there. I think sharks would want Bourgault as RW is a weaker position both in NHL and development wise.
But again if this was available sharks should pounce on it.


I think furlong + cagnioni are still 3+ years away, but I do agree LD we are set even though Thrun and Furlong both can play RD (tbd if thats at NHL level). In terms of right wing would bourgault be better than Cardsy Haltunnen or Zetterlund?

I chose three assets to dump Campbell + cover the cost of Khak + whichever D u wanted not Ferraro. Broberg is an all time low in terms of value rn
10 janv. à 15 h 2
#18
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2020
Messages: 11,284
Mentions "j'aime": 4,686
Quoting: sharcuda22
I think furlong + cagnioni are still 3+ years away, but I do agree LD we are set even though Thrun and Furlong both can play RD (tbd if thats at NHL level). In terms of right wing would bourgault be better than Cardsy Haltunnen or Zetterlund?

I chose three assets to dump Campbell + cover the cost of Khak + whichever D u wanted not Ferraro. Broberg is an all time low in terms of value rn


100% agree both are 2-4 years (give or take) and both likely are depth D (3rd line HS) type guys.
And if we move a LD over, Mukhamadulin is the most comfortable at RD.
Bourgault is better than Cards and Possibly Halttunen )who screams 1 dimensional scoring wing) but Zetterlund is better.
TBF I don’t love any of EDM prospects for the sharks and would rather just get extra picks.
sharcuda22 a aimé ceci.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage