SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

TDL idea plus playoff lineup

Créé par: WJC_Enthusiast
Équipe: 2023-24 Rangers de New York
Date de création initiale: 5 janv. 2024
Publié: 5 janv. 2024
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Transactions
NYR
  1. Olofsson, Victor (1 500 000 $ retained)
BUF
  1. Choix de 2e ronde en 2024 (NYR)
Rachats de contrats
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2024
Logo de NYR
Logo de NYR
Logo de NYR
Logo de NYR
2025
Logo de NYR
Logo de DAL
Logo de NYR
Logo de MIN
Logo de NYR
Logo de NYR
2026
Logo de NYR
Logo de NYR
Logo de NYR
Logo de NYR
Logo de NYR
Logo de NYR
Logo de VAN
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2483 500 000 $86 837 416 $610 892 $882 500 $-3 337 416 $

Formation

Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Rangers de New York
6 500 000 $6 500 000 $
AG
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo de Rangers de New York
8 500 000 $8 500 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 7
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
3 250 000 $3 250 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Rangers de New York
11 642 857 $11 642 857 $
AG
NMC
UFA - 3
Logo de Rangers de New York
5 625 000 $5 625 000 $
C, AD
NMC
UFA - 6
Logo de Rangers de New York
2 325 000 $2 325 000 $
AG, AD
RFA - 2
Logo de Rangers de New York
828 333 $828 333 $ (Bonis de performance82 500 $$82K)
AG
RFA - 2
Logo de Rangers de New York
4 437 500 $4 437 500 $
C, AG
UFA - 4
Logo de Rangers de New York
2 100 000 $2 100 000 $
AD
RFA - 1
Logo de Rangers de New York
800 000 $800 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Rangers de New York
3 641 667 $3 641 667 $
C, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo de Rangers de New York
800 000 $800 000 $ (Bonis de performance300 000 $$300K)
AD
NTC
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Rangers de New York
3 872 000 $3 872 000 $
DG
RFA - 2
Logo de Rangers de New York
9 500 000 $9 500 000 $
DD
UFA - 6
Logo de Rangers de New York
5 666 667 $5 666 667 $
G
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Rangers de New York
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
DG
RFA - 1
Logo de Rangers de New York
8 000 000 $8 000 000 $
DD
NMC
UFA - 3
Logo de Rangers de New York
825 000 $825 000 $ (Bonis de performance100 000 $$100K)
G
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Rangers de New York
825 000 $825 000 $
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Rangers de New York
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance400 000 $$400K)
DD
RFA - 1
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Rangers de New York
762 500 $762 500 $
C
UFA - 1
Logo de Rangers de New York
787 500 $787 500 $
AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Rangers de New York
800 000 $800 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Rangers de New York
812 500 $812 500 $
DG
RFA - 2

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
5 janv. à 19 h 31
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2023
Messages: 5,655
Mentions "j'aime": 3,749
Now that we are finally healthy, the Sabres do have some extra forwards bc our youth has been playing so well
I think a trade like u propose is certainly possible
Vancity2196 et gretzkyghosts a aimé ceci.
5 janv. à 19 h 34
#2
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2022
Messages: 3,789
Mentions "j'aime": 1,208
If the Rangers need to find a good forward, this trade is acceptable.
gretzkyghosts a aimé ceci.
5 janv. à 19 h 38
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2022
Messages: 2,069
Mentions "j'aime": 1,382
sold
gretzkyghosts a aimé ceci.
5 janv. à 19 h 42
#4
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2023
Messages: 5,655
Mentions "j'aime": 3,749
Quoting: Vancity2196
If the Rangers need to find a good forward, this trade is acceptable.


Idk that I’d call him “good”
But his defense has improved & his 5v5 play has been much better the last few seasons- so while he is offensively focused, he’s also far from the “”PP specialist” he used to be

If used correctly, he could be an asset for a playoff team
5 janv. à 19 h 43
#5
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2023
Messages: 5,655
Mentions "j'aime": 3,749
Dbl post
5 janv. à 20 h 0
#6
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2023
Messages: 355
Mentions "j'aime": 123
Quoting: AntiAnalytics
Idk that I’d call him “good”
But his defense has improved & his 5v5 play has been much better the last few seasons- so while he is offensively focused, he’s also far from the “”PP specialist” he used to be

If used correctly, he could be an asset for a playoff team


Can you explain his drop in production?
5 janv. à 20 h 3
#7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2021
Messages: 5,269
Mentions "j'aime": 2,299
Quoting: Vancity2196
If the Rangers need to find a good forward, this trade is acceptable.


Quoting: AntiAnalytics
Now that we are finally healthy, the Sabres do have some extra forwards bc our youth has been playing so well
I think a trade like u propose is certainly possible


Wouldn’t be totally against it. But 3C is the priority over another winger
AntiAnalytics a aimé ceci.
5 janv. à 20 h 5
#8
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2023
Messages: 5,655
Mentions "j'aime": 3,749
Quoting: WJC_Enthusiast
Can you explain his drop in production?


Bumped down to PP2
And has seen his 5v5 icetime decline
Our coach is seemingly not a big fan

But also, all the young talent we have has been playing so well that we wanna see them on the ice- & that icetime has to come from somewhere

Essentially we’ve been choosing to play & develop them over Olofsson bc (I’m assuming) we don’t see him as a long term “core” member
gretzkyghosts a aimé ceci.
5 janv. à 20 h 7
#9
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2023
Messages: 5,655
Mentions "j'aime": 3,749
Quoting: Rags21
Wouldn’t be totally against it. But 3C is the priority over another winger


That’s fair
Do u guys have Cap room to do both ?
Sabres could also hold a bit more to get his cap hit down to $2.4mil
gretzkyghosts a aimé ceci.
5 janv. à 20 h 9
#10
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2021
Messages: 5,269
Mentions "j'aime": 2,299
Quoting: AntiAnalytics
That’s fair
Do u guys have Cap room to do both ?
Sabres could also hold a bit more to get his cap hit down to $2.4mil


I think the more retention the better. Unless the rangers target Novak who’s only $800k
AntiAnalytics et gretzkyghosts a aimé ceci.
5 janv. à 20 h 19
#11
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2023
Messages: 5,655
Mentions "j'aime": 3,749
Quoting: Rags21
I think the more retention the better. Unless the rangers target Novak who’s only $800k


I don’t see any reason the Sabres wouldn’t be ok with holding the max retention possible
If not a deal with you guys, I’d imagine someone looking for a bit more offense would be interested in a deal for him
Rags21 et gretzkyghosts a aimé ceci.
5 janv. à 21 h 2
#12
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2020
Messages: 1,121
Mentions "j'aime": 664
Quoting: AntiAnalytics
I don’t see any reason the Sabres wouldn’t be ok with holding the max retention possible
If not a deal with you guys, I’d imagine someone looking for a bit more offense would be interested in a deal for him


Slam dunk deal for Buffalo, good move for the Rags. Not sure it fits into president Pegula's mantra. Is it effective? Yup. Efficient? Sure. Economic?...

Nope.

Just my 2 cents.
gretzkyghosts a aimé ceci.
5 janv. à 22 h 7
#13
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2019
Messages: 1,536
Mentions "j'aime": 618
Olofsson has a very good one timer - when he hurt his wrist the season before last he showed very good passing ability but when his shot came back the passing went away- sometimes something happens and he gets fired up and shows a pretty good defensive and checking game but that doesn't happen very often - To me a little bit of a frustrating player but maybe no one ever asked him to do it all "Hey, Victor, We'd like you to score goals, make assists, check and play defense all at once every game" "Really, sure all right"
5 janv. à 22 h 26
#14
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2023
Messages: 5,655
Mentions "j'aime": 3,749
Quoting: Boos
Slam dunk deal for Buffalo, good move for the Rags. Not sure it fits into president Pegula's mantra. Is it effective? Yup. Efficient? Sure. Economic?...

Nope.

Just my 2 cents.


First off,
trading Olofsson & holding half still has us paying LESS than if we kept him- so you’re wrong, it actually IS “economic”

Secondly,
where exactly is it written that Pegula isn’t gonna spend $$$ ?
This seems to be an idea that’s just been ASSUMED, & not necessarily rooted in reality
gretzkyghosts a aimé ceci.
6 janv. à 12 h 28
#15
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2020
Messages: 1,121
Mentions "j'aime": 664
Quoting: AntiAnalytics
First off,
trading Olofsson & holding half still has us paying LESS than if we kept him- so you’re wrong, it actually IS “economic”

Secondly,
where exactly is it written that Pegula isn’t gonna spend $$$ ?
This seems to be an idea that’s just been ASSUMED, & not necessarily rooted in reality


It's not me that says no to retaining salary, it would be Pegula. To my knowledge, the Sabres have retained salary once dating back to GMTM (if not further,) and that was retention to move Taylor Hall. At the time of the trade, the Sabres were in a bind because of Hall's no movement clause and the Bruins (Hall's only choice) needed retention to fit him in, even though about 75% of the season had already been played.

Pegula has enough financial trouble paying coaches and executives who no longer work for him and save for the buyouts early in his ownership, I highly doubt he wants to pay a player not to play for him (Bishop's salary to become cap-compliant not included.)

As for the spending aspect, it's his words. He wants the organization to be, "effective, efficient and economic."

*shrugs*
gretzkyghosts a aimé ceci.
6 janv. à 14 h 1
#16
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2023
Messages: 5,655
Mentions "j'aime": 3,749
Quoting: Boos
It's not me that says no to retaining salary, it would be Pegula. To my knowledge, the Sabres have retained salary once dating back to GMTM (if not further,) and that was retention to move Taylor Hall. At the time of the trade, the Sabres were in a bind because of Hall's no movement clause and the Bruins (Hall's only choice) needed retention to fit him in, even though about 75% of the season had already been played.

Pegula has enough financial trouble paying coaches and executives who no longer work for him and save for the buyouts early in his ownership, I highly doubt he wants to pay a player not to play for him (Bishop's salary to become cap-compliant not included.)

As for the spending aspect, it's his words. He wants the organization to be, "effective, efficient and economic."

*shrugs*


Again,
Trading Olofsson & holding half is more “economic” than keeping him & paying full salary

And Pegula has no trouble paying anyone
He has all kinds of $$$
6 janv. à 14 h 18
#17
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2020
Messages: 1,121
Mentions "j'aime": 664
Quoting: AntiAnalytics
Again,
Trading Olofsson & holding half is more “economic” than keeping him & paying full salary

And Pegula has no trouble paying anyone
He has all kinds of $$$


Pegula's been losing tens of millions of dollars a year on the Sabres, plus he's been paying coaches and executives for years, plus he lost a lot of $$$ during the pandemic and, not to forget, he lost a ****-ton on Kim's PSE ventures.

No need to get upset with me. I'd do the trade in a heartbeat. No questions asked. In fact every fan in Sabreland would do it as proposed in a heartbeat. Hell, I think KAGM would do it as well. I just don't think Uncle Terry will retain on him, but if he does, you win bragging rights. If they don't, I win.

Deal?
gretzkyghosts a aimé ceci.
6 janv. à 15 h 23
#18
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2023
Messages: 5,655
Mentions "j'aime": 3,749
Quoting: Boos
Pegula's been losing tens of millions of dollars a year on the Sabres, plus he's been paying coaches and executives for years, plus he lost a lot of $$$ during the pandemic and, not to forget, he lost a ****-ton on Kim's PSE ventures.

No need to get upset with me. I'd do the trade in a heartbeat. No questions asked. In fact every fan in Sabreland would do it as proposed in a heartbeat. Hell, I think KAGM would do it as well. I just don't think Uncle Terry will retain on him, but if he does, you win bragging rights. If they don't, I win.

Deal?


I’m not even a little upset with you
Just doing simple math
If $$$ is indeed an issue, paying half of Olofsson’s salary is cheaper than paying the full thing

And sure, the Sabres lose $$ on a yearly basis
The franchise also appreciates value as well though,
and Pegula is a billionaire besides
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage