SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Just an idea

Créé par: Marcsnack
Équipe: 2023-24 Penguins de Pittsburgh
Date de création initiale: 27 déc. 2023
Publié: 27 déc. 2023
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
Give T. Smith a chance before the deadline, move on from POJ. I feel like a Ludvig-Smith pairing could do well.

The Leafs trade is kinda wacky, but we bring in 2 solid wingers. We also downgrade in nets, but back Jarry.
Transactions
1.
PIT
  1. Choix de 5e ronde en 2024 (CHI)
2.
Rachats de contrats
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2024
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de CHI
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de NYR
2025
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
2026
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de SJS
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2383 500 000 $81 501 009 $0 $0 $1 998 991 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
4 500 000 $4 500 000 $
AG, AD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
8 700 000 $8 700 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 2
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
5 125 000 $5 125 000 $
AD, AG
NMC
UFA - 5
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
2 100 000 $2 100 000 $
AD, C, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
6 100 000 $6 100 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 3
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
775 000 $775 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
796 667 $796 667 $
AG, AD
RFA - 1
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
2 450 000 $2 450 000 $
C
UFA - 2
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
AD, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 5
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
900 000 $900 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
C, AD
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
775 000 $775 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
4 500 000 $4 500 000 $
DG
M-NTC
UFA - 6
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
6 100 000 $6 100 000 $
DD
NMC
UFA - 5
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
5 375 000 $5 375 000 $
G
M-NTC
UFA - 5
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
4 025 175 $4 025 175 $
DG
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
10 000 000 $10 000 000 $
DD
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
3 550 000 $3 550 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
775 000 $775 000 $
DG
RFA - 2
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
775 000 $775 000 $
DG/DD
RFA - 1
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
3 125 000 $3 125 000 $
AD, C
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
775 000 $775 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
800 000 $800 000 $
DD
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
27 déc. 2023 à 12 h 3
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2023
Messages: 233
Mentions "j'aime": 123
I’m not sure leaf want a oder forward
SomeonesOffended a aimé ceci.
27 déc. 2023 à 12 h 9
#2
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2020
Messages: 3,342
Mentions "j'aime": 1,184
Quoting: The_random_sens_fan
I’m not sure leaf want a oder forward


Both Smith & Jarnkrok are 32, if anything Smith is signed to less term.
They get slightly older going from Robertson/Samsonov to O'Connor/Nedeljkovic.
The_random_sens_fan a aimé ceci.
27 déc. 2023 à 13 h 36
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2022
Messages: 3,356
Mentions "j'aime": 1,010
Tough call. If Ludvig/Smith are given sufficient playing time before the deadline and they perform well - then moving POJ could be a possibility. But I wouldn't dump POJ just to try and give Smith playing time. POJ is a legitimate NHL dman - Smith and Ludvig are question marks/fringe NHLers at this point. Unfortunately Smith seems to be way down on the totem pole - so not sure if we will get that chance before the deadline to know if POJ is somewhat expendable. It could obviously work out - just not sure if I would take that risk without seeing Smith/Ludvig play together.
Marcsnack a aimé ceci.
27 déc. 2023 à 13 h 47
#4
Analytics are good
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2018
Messages: 3,604
Mentions "j'aime": 962
Ty Smith has proven he's not an NHL talent.

That Leafs trade is geniunely terrible. It makes absolutely no sense at all for the Pens.
27 déc. 2023 à 13 h 49
#5
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2020
Messages: 3,342
Mentions "j'aime": 1,184
Quoting: JSEB93
Tough call. If Ludvig/Smith are given sufficient playing time before the deadline and they perform well - then moving POJ could be a possibility. But I wouldn't dump POJ just to try and give Smith playing time. POJ is a legitimate NHL dman - Smith and Ludvig are question marks/fringe NHLers at this point. Unfortunately Smith seems to be way down on the totem pole - so not sure if we will get that chance before the deadline to know if POJ is somewhat expendable. It could obviously work out - just not sure if I would take that risk without seeing Smith/Ludvig play together.


That's fair. I feel like Smith has been playing well offensively in the AHL, but also putting up 3 points in his Spengler Cup game yesterday. A physical partner in Ludvig could be really nice, but I guess that partner could also be POJ. If anything, we can keep the 5-6-7 spots with Ludvig, POJ & Ruhwedel, but there were reports that the Pens wanted to upgrade the bottom pair, so internally, Smith could get a chance. However, this is the smaller part of this whole armchair-GM post.
JSEB93 a aimé ceci.
27 déc. 2023 à 13 h 51
#6
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2020
Messages: 3,342
Mentions "j'aime": 1,184
Quoting: PenGoater99
Ty Smith has proven he's not an NHL talent.

That Leafs trade is geniunely terrible. It makes absolutely no sense at all for the Pens.


Idk man, recently he has been putting up solid numbers, notably 3 points in the Spengler Cup in 1 game. A defensive/physical partner in Ludvig could complement his game.

I do see why the trade can be seen as not ideal. I think Smith is the best player, but I dont think he has been the best fit. I also made it to clear up cap space for next season, so we have a better chance to re-sign Jake and bring in another FA (top 6 LW, 3C). The Leafs could add a prospect or pick to incentivize us a bit more.
27 déc. 2023 à 14 h 12
#7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2022
Messages: 3,356
Mentions "j'aime": 1,010
Quoting: Marcsnack
That's fair. I feel like Smith has been playing well offensively in the AHL, but also putting up 3 points in his Spengler Cup game yesterday. A physical partner in Ludvig could be really nice, but I guess that partner could also be POJ. If anything, we can keep the 5-6-7 spots with Ludvig, POJ & Ruhwedel, but there were reports that the Pens wanted to upgrade the bottom pair, so internally, Smith could get a chance. However, this is the smaller part of this whole armchair-GM post.


He might be - I don't keep up with the baby Pens as much as I should. Smith looked good in his limited time last year as well. Honestly in the offseason I was pushing for POJ/Smith down the left side haha - so I'm definitely not opposed to him getting another shot. And agreed - the playstyles on paper could be a good match between the two. I like Ludvig and the physicality he brings - but the results and play overall have been a bit subpar imo. So it just worried me a bit. And true haha - I commented only on the small move. I'm weird. I also didn't have a good take on the TOR trade. I don't think it's a bad trade - but considering the way Ned has played this year I probably wouldn't do it just for that reason alone.
Marcsnack a aimé ceci.
27 déc. 2023 à 14 h 16
#8
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2020
Messages: 3,342
Mentions "j'aime": 1,184
Quoting: JSEB93
He might be - I don't keep up with the baby Pens as much as I should. Smith looked good in his limited time last year as well. Honestly in the offseason I was pushing for POJ/Smith down the left side haha - so I'm definitely not opposed to him getting another shot. And agreed - the playstyles on paper could be a good match between the two. I like Ludvig and the physicality he brings - but the results and play overall have been a bit subpar imo. So it just worried me a bit. And true haha - I commented only on the small move. I'm weird. I also didn't have a good take on the TOR trade


I could see why people are done with Smith, but if we are gonna make a trade, might as well try internally, like we did with the offense.
JSEB93 a aimé ceci.
27 déc. 2023 à 14 h 18
#9
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2022
Messages: 3,356
Mentions "j'aime": 1,010
Quoting: Marcsnack
I could see why people are done with Smith, but if we are gonna make a trade, might as well try internally, like we did with the offense.


For sure - I get it - and not saying it definitely wouldn't work. I guess I'd just like that pair on the ice before we trade POJ. But that's a bit of a catch 22, because Smith probably doesn't see the ice without that trade.
Marcsnack a aimé ceci.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage