I thought Tanev would get a 1st + 3rd or so. Reports are suggesting he would be cheaper. I still think he nets a 1st. We will see.

Lindholm is very comparable to Horvat from last year. So 1st + Good Prospect + Cap.

Why does Vancouver need Elias Lindholm when they have Elias Pettersson?
I rather have Calgary trade Chris Tanev ($2,250,000 retained) in exchange for Tyler Myers or even a Canuck's prospect player like Danila Klimovich or Aaty Ratu.

Ok that is around what i was expecting. I appreciate it!

They dont "need" him, but at the moment Petterson, in my opinion, could for sure use a better linemate. No offence to Laff or Sutter etc. With kuzmenko under performing atm im just curious of what options might be out there is all.

I would be surprised if Vancouver got both Tanev and Lindholm.
But I do know that Lindholm wants to stay in Calgary long term, in my opinion.
However, his value could be a little bit higher.

If Vancouver really wants to go for it this year I think Lindholm and Tanev make a lot of sense. The Canucks certainly have the goods to acquire both as well. The Flames biggest need is defense prospects, and the Canucks have Wallinder and Brzustewics. Either of those guys would move the needle a lot for the Flames, more so than forward prospects and draft picks.