SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Leafs get a 2nd to get Tanev deal done

Créé par: DealFinder67
Équipe: 2023-24 Maple Leafs de Toronto
Date de création initiale: 16 déc. 2023
Publié: 16 déc. 2023
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
UFAANSCAP HIT
1800 000 $
Transactions
1.
TOR
  1. Choix de 2e ronde en 2025 (NJD)
NJD
  1. Lajoie, Maxime
  2. Samsonov, Ilya (1 775 000 $ retained)
2.
TOR
  1. Tanev, Christopher (2 225 000 $ retained)
CGY
  1. Benoit, Simon
  2. Choix de 5e ronde en 2024 (TOR)
  3. Choix de 2e ronde en 2025 (NJD)
3.
TOR
  1. Murphy, Connor
  2. Choix de 2e ronde en 2024 (VAN)
CHI
  1. Järnkrok, Calle
  2. Liljegren, Timothy
  3. Choix de 1e ronde en 2024 (TOR)
4.
TOR
  1. Reimer, James (750 000 $ retained)
DET
  1. Holmberg, Pontus
  2. Choix de 4e ronde en 2024 (TOR)
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Enfoui
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2024
Logo de VAN
Logo de NYI
Logo de CGY
Logo de VAN
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de OTT
2025
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de CHI
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
2026
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2083 500 000 $79 531 450 $0 $0 $3 968 550 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
5 500 000 $5 500 000 $
AG, AD
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
11 640 250 $11 640 250 $
C
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
10 903 000 $10 903 000 $
AD
NMC
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
925 000 $925 000 $
AG, AD
RFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
11 000 000 $11 000 000 $
C, AG
NMC
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
6 962 366 $6 962 366 $
AD
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
796 667 $796 667 $
AG, AD
RFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
C, AD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
800 000 $800 000 $
AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
762 500 $762 500 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
2 400 000 $2 400 000 $
C
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
775 000 $775 000 $
AG, AD
RFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
7 500 000 $7 500 000 $
DG
NMC
UFA - 7
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
4 400 000 $4 400 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
875 000 $875 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
DG/DD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
-1 100 000 $-1 100 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Red Wings de Detroit
750 000 $750 000 $
G
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
DG/DD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
1 100 000 $1 100 000 $
DD
RFA - 2
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
800 000 $800 000 $
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
5 625 000 $5 625 000 $
DG
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
766 667 $766 667 $
G
RFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
4 687 500 $4 687 500 $
G
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
4 150 000 $4 150 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
16 déc. 2023 à 17 h 22
#26
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2019
Messages: 41,449
Mentions "j'aime": 18,825
Quoting: MoxNix
Because Chris Tanev won't be that cheap to acquire. It'll take a 1st +


Based on what?

(I was comparing the two trades above).
17 déc. 2023 à 9 h 31
#27
Blackhawks Faithful
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2018
Messages: 674
Mentions "j'aime": 455
Quoting: Garak
I was actually just thinking of something similar recently. But I had TOR's 2026 1st instead of the 2024 1st, no 2nd going to TOR, 50% retention on Murphy, Donato going to TOR, and CHI taking back Reaves and Samsonov instead of Jarnkrok. So, TOR would be getting even more value than the 2024 2nd. Interesting... Maybe I was going overboard on giving TOR sweeteners, but CHI has a lot longer way to go than some CHI fans seem to think. So, adding more 1st round picks is pretty valuable to our rebuild, IMO. I never hit publish, though. I'd rather critique other peoples ACGM's than deal with critiques on my own. haha

Also, you're probably gonna have to pay more for Tanev. Given that he is a pending UFA rental and I personally think he is a bit overrated, I don't think he is gonna get as much as CGY fans want, but I definitely think he will get more than that. Especially with the retention.


Come-on Garak we want to see what you put together! In a fictional Garak world what would he do?
Garak a aimé ceci.
17 déc. 2023 à 10 h 11
#28
Démarrer sujet
We Need D!!
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2023
Messages: 1,256
Mentions "j'aime": 359
Quoting: Jhmarrio
Leafs fans - you're not getting Tanev for scraps and garbage.

Funny, this reminds of the Zadorov chat before he went for scraps
17 déc. 2023 à 11 h 20
#29
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 11,423
Mentions "j'aime": 11,453
Quoting: RicXX
Come-on Garak we want to see what you put together! In a fictional Garak world what would he do?


haha. Fine. I'll put some of my idea's together and actually hit publish this time.
RicXX a aimé ceci.
17 déc. 2023 à 11 h 25
#30
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 11,423
Mentions "j'aime": 11,453
Quoting: mpf1989
I think Chicago would jump on the chance to unload Murphy ASAP. Getting Liljegren back to fill his spot plus a 1st rounder would be a deal they couldn't pass up. Murphy just seems lost out there. I don't know if it's trying to help bring along younger defensemen this season, but his play has been atrocious. Maybe a change of scenery to a contending team would spark him.


Quite the opposite. He is their best veteran defensive defenseman, he eats tons of minutes, he is a consummate pro, a leader on and off the ice, an RHD, and CHI's longest tenured player. Sure his stat line tells a different story, but he is a good defenseman that they are in no rush to move, and likely wouldn't do it without a very good package coming back. It's not his fault CHI is the worst roster in the league and he has to babysit defensive liabilities every night.
DealFinder67 a aimé ceci.
17 déc. 2023 à 12 h 4
#31
Démarrer sujet
We Need D!!
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2023
Messages: 1,256
Mentions "j'aime": 359
Quoting: Garak
Quite the opposite. He is their best veteran defensive defenseman, he eats tons of minutes, he is a consummate pro, a leader on and off the ice, an RHD, and CHI's longest tenured player. Sure his stat line tells a different story, but he is a good defenseman that they are in no rush to move, and likely wouldn't do it without a very good package coming back. It's not his fault CHI is the worst roster in the league and he has to babysit defensive liabilities every night.


Amen Garak
Garak a aimé ceci.
17 déc. 2023 à 15 h 53
#32
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 11,423
Mentions "j'aime": 11,453
Quoting: RicXX
Come-on Garak we want to see what you put together! In a fictional Garak world what would he do?


Yeah. Nope. Changed my mind and deleted it.
DealFinder67 et RicXX a aimé ceci.
20 déc. 2023 à 18 h 43
#33
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2015
Messages: 43
Mentions "j'aime": 16
Quoting: Garak
Quite the opposite. He is their best veteran defensive defenseman, he eats tons of minutes, he is a consummate pro, a leader on and off the ice, an RHD, and CHI's longest tenured player. Sure his stat line tells a different story, but he is a good defenseman that they are in no rush to move, and likely wouldn't do it without a very good package coming back. It's not his fault CHI is the worst roster in the league and he has to babysit defensive liabilities every night.


No, he's bad. He's always been bad. It just used to be easier for them to hide his deficiencies on better rosters. Bowman was dumb to acquire him in 2017, and he was dumb to extend him in 2021. He won't be of any use to the organization by the time they're ready to compete. A first rounder for him would be plenty.
20 déc. 2023 à 19 h 13
#34
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 11,423
Mentions "j'aime": 11,453
Quoting: mpf1989
No, he's bad. He's always been bad. It just used to be easier for them to hide his deficiencies on better rosters. Bowman was dumb to acquire him in 2017, and he was dumb to extend him in 2021. He won't be of any use to the organization by the time they're ready to compete. A first rounder for him would be plenty.


No. He isn't bad. Also, that isn't a 1st rounder. That is trading up from the late 2nd to the late 1st. Which isn't nothing, but it isn't enough either.
DealFinder67 a aimé ceci.
20 déc. 2023 à 19 h 21
#35
Démarrer sujet
We Need D!!
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2023
Messages: 1,256
Mentions "j'aime": 359
Quoting: Garak
No. He isn't bad. Also, that isn't a 1st rounder. That is trading up from the late 2nd to the late 1st. Which isn't nothing, but it isn't enough either.


You guys got quite the debate going on. Lol, but obvi I’m a Murphy fan myself and think he would prosper with a better supporting cast.
Garak a aimé ceci.
20 déc. 2023 à 19 h 31
#36
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 11,423
Mentions "j'aime": 11,453
Quoting: DealFinder67
You guys got quite the debate going on. Lol, but obvi I’m a Murphy fan myself and think he would prosper with a better supporting cast.


Some people just don't get defensive play. They think "if they aren't contributing on offense then they are bad." And it's just wrong. Defensive leaning coaches like Luke Richardson and Kevin Dean wouldn't play him 18 plus minutes a night on the toughest defensive assignments and paired with their rookie dman who is a defensive liability if he was "bad".
DealFinder67 a aimé ceci.
20 déc. 2023 à 22 h 19
#37
Démarrer sujet
We Need D!!
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2023
Messages: 1,256
Mentions "j'aime": 359
Quoting: Garak
Some people just don't get defensive play. They think "if they aren't contributing on offense then they are bad." And it's just wrong. Defensive leaning coaches like Luke Richardson and Kevin Dean wouldn't play him 18 plus minutes a night on the toughest defensive assignments and paired with their rookie dman who is a defensive liability if he was "bad".


I agree. People look too much into these analytics stats. Leafs are looking for a reliable RHD that can play in the top pair. I think he fits the criteria for the Leafs pretty well
Garak a aimé ceci.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage