SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Do or die

Créé par: kawhislaugh
Équipe: 2023-24 Oilers d'Edmonton
Date de création initiale: 22 nov. 2023
Publié: 24 nov. 2023
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Transactions
1.
EDM
  1. Mrázek, Petr
  2. Murphy, Connor
  3. Perry, Corey (2 000 000 $ retained)
2.
EDM
  1. Peeke, Andrew (1 375 000 $ retained)
CBJ
  1. Desharnais, Vincent
  2. Foegele, Warren
  3. Choix de 2e ronde en 2024 (EDM)
3.
EDM
  1. Bjugstad, Nick (1 050 000 $ retained)
Rachats de contrats
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2024
Logo de EDM
Logo de EDM
Logo de NSH
2025
Logo de EDM
Logo de EDM
Logo de EDM
Logo de EDM
Logo de EDM
Logo de EDM
2026
Logo de EDM
Logo de EDM
Logo de EDM
Logo de EDM
Logo de EDM
Logo de EDM
Logo de EDM
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2183 500 000 $79 666 667 $850 000 $4 200 000 $3 833 333 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
8 500 000 $8 500 000 $
C, AG
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 2
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
12 500 000 $12 500 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 3
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
775 000 $775 000 $ (Bonis de performance3 225 000 $$3M)
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
5 125 000 $5 125 000 $
AG, AD
NMC
UFA - 3
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
5 125 000 $5 125 000 $
AG, C
NMC
UFA - 6
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
5 500 000 $5 500 000 $
AD, AG
NMC
UFA - 5
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance650 000 $$650K)
AG, C
RFA - 1
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
2 100 000 $2 100 000 $
C
RFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
-1 225 000 $-1 225 000 $ (Bonis de performance325 000 $$325K)
AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
900 000 $900 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Coyotes de l'Arizona
1 050 000 $1 050 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
775 000 $775 000 $
AD, C
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
9 250 000 $9 250 000 $
DG
NMC
UFA - 7
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
4 400 000 $4 400 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
2 600 000 $2 600 000 $
G
UFA - 3
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 3
Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus
1 375 000 $1 375 000 $
DD
UFA - 3
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
3 800 000 $3 800 000 $
G
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
2 750 000 $2 750 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 3
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
3 900 000 $3 900 000 $
DD
RFA - 2
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
775 000 $775 000 $
DG
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
24 nov. 2023 à 13 h 31
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2021
Messages: 748
Mentions "j'aime": 813
Jackets decline. We arent retaining that amount on Peeke. We also have no interest in 2 rentals.
24 nov. 2023 à 13 h 33
#2
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2023
Messages: 1,285
Mentions "j'aime": 357
Quoting: BoomerTheHero
Jackets decline. We arent retaining that amount on Peeke. We also have no interest in 2 rentals.

Oilers have no interest in a cap dump defensemen that has no idea how to play defence
24 nov. 2023 à 13 h 35
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2023
Messages: 1,285
Mentions "j'aime": 357
Oilers aren’t trading the 2024 1st that’s just not realistic also they aren’t giving up Broberg to receive Bjugstad also not realistic at all
24 nov. 2023 à 13 h 38
#4
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2023
Messages: 405
Mentions "j'aime": 525
Modifié 24 nov. 2023 à 13 h 44
I think the Hawks don't even consider this deal, even with NOTHING going back to EDM. Taking on Campbell's and Ceci's contracts by themselves will cost a LOT more than a single 1st round pick. But with the Hawks adding Mrazek, Murphy, and Perry (with retention, no less!) to EDM's return, it'd take a LOT more in high picks and top prospects; likely, much more than the EDM would consider.
Snowhawk18 et Garak a aimé ceci.
24 nov. 2023 à 13 h 50
#5
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2023
Messages: 2,844
Mentions "j'aime": 834
AZ pass Bjug is on 56pt pace and only veteran C on the team. funny thing you had him end of last year didnt resign
24 nov. 2023 à 13 h 51
#6
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2021
Messages: 748
Mentions "j'aime": 813
Quoting: Oilers_29
Oilers have no interest in a cap dump defensemen that has no idea how to play defence


lol ok
24 nov. 2023 à 13 h 54
#7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2023
Messages: 1,285
Mentions "j'aime": 357
Quoting: LivingAnew
I think the Hawks don't even consider this deal, even with NOTHING going back to EDM. Taking on Campbell's and Ceci's contracts by themselves will cost a LOT more than a single 1st round pick. But with the Hawks adding Mrazek, Murphy, and Perry (with retention, no less!) to EDM's return, it'd take a LOT more in high picks and top prospects; likely, much more than the EDM would consider.


I’m sorry but you have no idea what ur talking about about ceci isn’t a cap dump
24 nov. 2023 à 13 h 55
#8
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2022
Messages: 163
Mentions "j'aime": 79
The oilers didn’t pay for the dump of Campbell let alone everything the hawks are giving up as well. Not even close to the hawks accepting
Snowhawk18 et Garak a aimé ceci.
24 nov. 2023 à 14 h 4
#9
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2023
Messages: 405
Mentions "j'aime": 525
Quoting: Oilers_29
I’m sorry but you have no idea what ur talking about about ceci isn’t a cap dump


Okay... Good luck!
Garak a aimé ceci.
24 nov. 2023 à 14 h 10
#10
Snowhawk
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2022
Messages: 2,420
Mentions "j'aime": 3,455
Quoting: Oilers_29
I’m sorry but you have no idea what ur talking about about ceci isn’t a cap dump


Where did he say Ceci was a cap dump? You put words in someone’s mouth and then claim the person making statement has no idea what they are talking about, so in fact it is you who has no idea what you are talking about.
LivingAnew et Garak a aimé ceci.
24 nov. 2023 à 14 h 29
#11
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2023
Messages: 405
Mentions "j'aime": 525
Quoting: Snowhawk18
Where did he say Ceci was a cap dump? You put words in someone’s mouth and then claim the person making statement has no idea what they are talking about, so in fact it is you who has no idea what you are talking about.


Thanks, Snowhawk. I didn't even want to get into it with him, so just let it go.... I liked your succinct response, tho!

Ceci might be a cap casualty vs a camp dump, but to the Hawks it's all about his AVV. They aren't in the "win now" business, so it's his cap hit that's most relevant to them, IMO... He's gonna be LONG GONE by the time the Hawks are relevant again.

Cheers
Snowhawk18 et Garak a aimé ceci.
24 nov. 2023 à 14 h 32
#12
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2022
Messages: 768
Mentions "j'aime": 502
Quoting: bwhsocal
AZ pass Bjug is on 56pt pace and only veteran C on the team. funny thing you had him end of last year didnt resign


Agree with this. Value is good. I'd be tempted just because I still have hopes for Broberg and they need NHL-ready D, but they are even thinner at C right now with injuries.
Would strongly reconsider something like this closer to the deadline if/when they drop down the standings with the injuries, but they need what Bjugstad is bringing right now. They don't need to win this season, but they can't go back to being uncompetitive everynight.
24 nov. 2023 à 14 h 33
#13
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2023
Messages: 1,285
Mentions "j'aime": 357
Quoting: Snowhawk18
Where did he say Ceci was a cap dump? You put words in someone’s mouth and then claim the person making statement has no idea what they are talking about, so in fact it is you who has no idea what you are talking about.


Idk if u can read or not but he said “taking on campbells and ceci contracts will cost a lot” that is pretty much insisting that ceci is a cap dump but ok man maybe try reading.
24 nov. 2023 à 14 h 49
#14
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2023
Messages: 2,844
Mentions "j'aime": 834
Quoting: Pompadour_de_Armstrong
Agree with this. Value is good. I'd be tempted just because I still have hopes for Broberg and they need NHL-ready D, but they are even thinner at C right now with injuries.
Would strongly reconsider something like this closer to the deadline if/when they drop down the standings with the injuries, but they need what Bjugstad is bringing right now. They don't need to win this season, but they can't go back to being uncompetitive everynight.

unless AZ goes out and gets top 6 C, next year is 24yo hayton and mcbain and 20yo cooley in the middle still going to need bjug next year. geekie cant see as ready (20yo next year) and i dont see a top 6 C in prospect pool. I wouldnt mind GMBA kick around on CAL Lindholm he would be a solid top 6 C turning 29yo if could get on 5 yr deal.
24 nov. 2023 à 15 h 23
#15
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2022
Messages: 768
Mentions "j'aime": 502
Quoting: bwhsocal
unless AZ goes out and gets top 6 C, next year is 24yo hayton and mcbain and 20yo cooley in the middle still going to need bjug next year. geekie cant see as ready (20yo next year) and i dont see a top 6 C in prospect pool.


I'd be fine with Hayton, Cooley, McBain as the top three centers next year, to be honest. But doing it now while they are all banged up and trying to hold on to their position in the Central would be dumb.
They should be giving Jenik and Smith some time at center in the NHL while the injury bug is here, and see what they've got depthwise. Kerfoot and Boyd are emergency options for now, but neither is ideal. Things are so bad In the top six they tried Schmaltz at center again. Not a good time to trade Bjugstad. Closer to the deadline if they fold, I'd be happy to deal him for the right return.
24 nov. 2023 à 15 h 39
#16
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2023
Messages: 2,844
Mentions "j'aime": 834
Quoting: Pompadour_de_Armstrong
I'd be fine with Hayton, Cooley, McBain as the top three centers next year, to be honest. But doing it now while they are all banged up and trying to hold on to their position in the Central would be dumb.
They should be giving Jenik and Smith some time at center in the NHL while the injury bug is here, and see what they've got depthwise. Kerfoot and Boyd are emergency options for now, but neither is ideal. Things are so bad In the top six they tried Schmaltz at center again. Not a good time to trade Bjugstad. Closer to the deadline if they fold, I'd be happy to deal him for the right return.


completely agree now now can trade any C. C is weakest position and in the pool is Geekie (not close to NHL ready) and jenik/smith (I dont see as top 6 C), for this trade bromberg is nice on the cusp D but we are not lacking in D prospects - kesselring, koly, soda, duda, szuber, mavrik and simashev - most wont be top 4 but someone should jump up.
24 nov. 2023 à 16 h 24
#17
Snowhawk
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2022
Messages: 2,420
Mentions "j'aime": 3,455
Quoting: Oilers_29
Idk if u can read or not but he said “taking on campbells and ceci contracts will cost a lot” that is pretty much insisting that ceci is a cap dump but ok man maybe try reading.


So then by your definition every trade is a cap dump because the acquiring team takes on a players contract.

I can read just fine, you on the other hand lack comprehension skills.
Garak et LivingAnew a aimé ceci.
24 nov. 2023 à 16 h 55
#18
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2023
Messages: 1,285
Mentions "j'aime": 357
Modifié 24 nov. 2023 à 17 h 2
Quoting: Snowhawk18
So then by your definition every trade is a cap dump because the acquiring team takes on a players contract.

I can read just fine, you on the other hand lack comprehension skills.

“So taking on campbell and ceci contract will cost a 1st”

Please tell me what that means please cause apparently I don’t know what that means and can’t comprehend maybe you can tell me
24 nov. 2023 à 16 h 59
#19
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2023
Messages: 1,285
Mentions "j'aime": 357
Quoting: Snowhawk18
So then by your definition every trade is a cap dump because the acquiring team takes on a players contract.

I can read just fine, you on the other hand lack comprehension skills.

Are you sure you can read just fine?
24 nov. 2023 à 17 h 24
#20
Snowhawk
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2022
Messages: 2,420
Mentions "j'aime": 3,455
Quoting: Oilers_29
“So taking on campbell and ceci contract will cost a 1st”

Please tell me what that means please cause apparently I don’t know what that means and can’t comprehend maybe you can tell me


It could mean the person who posted this believes that by adding Ceci it reduces the draft compensation required to be paid the Oilers to move Campbell’s contract.

So for example maybe the creator of this post believes it would cost a 1st and 2nd round pick to trade Campbell’s contract but if they add Ceci now only a 1st round pick is required. In this scenario that would mean Ceci has a 2nd round value and IS NOT a cap dump… understand? Read slow, you will figure it out.
24 nov. 2023 à 17 h 50
#21
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2023
Messages: 1,285
Mentions "j'aime": 357
Modifié 24 nov. 2023 à 17 h 55
Quoting: Snowhawk18
It could mean the person who posted this believes that by adding Ceci it reduces the draft compensation required to be paid the Oilers to move Campbell’s contract.

So for example maybe the creator of this post believes it would cost a 1st and 2nd round pick to trade Campbell’s contract but if they add Ceci now only a 1st round pick is required. In this scenario that would mean Ceci has a 2nd round value and IS NOT a cap dump… understand? Read slow, you will figure it out.

Yeah you definitely don’t know how to read LMAO

“Taking on ceci and campbells contract will take a lot more than just a single 1st”

So the creator of this post is insisting that they are cap dumps and will cost more than just one first to take on both contracts glad we cleared this confusion or maybe you are still confused with those terrific Comprehension skills you have.

If he said for example “taking on campbells contract will cost a lot more than ceci and single 1st” then maybe it could mean exactly what you are saying but hey not everyone knows how to comprehend I guess
24 nov. 2023 à 18 h 23
#22
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 10,909
Mentions "j'aime": 10,702
Modifié 24 nov. 2023 à 18 h 28
Quoting: Snowhawk18
It could mean the person who posted this believes that by adding Ceci it reduces the draft compensation required to be paid the Oilers to move Campbell’s contract.

So for example maybe the creator of this post believes it would cost a 1st and 2nd round pick to trade Campbell’s contract but if they add Ceci now only a 1st round pick is required. In this scenario that would mean Ceci has a 2nd round value and IS NOT a cap dump… understand? Read slow, you will figure it out.


Quoting: Oilers_29
Yeah you definitely don’t know how to read LMAO

“Taking on ceci and campbells contract will take a lot more than just a single 1st”

So the creator of this post is insisting that they are cap dumps and will cost more than just one first to take on both contracts glad we cleared this confusion or maybe you are still confused with those terrific Comprehension skills you have.

If he said for example “taking on campbells contract will cost a lot more than ceci and single 1st” then maybe it could mean exactly what you are saying but hey not everyone knows how to comprehend I guess


I'm gonna go ahead and call a spade a spade here. Ceci is a cap dump, IMO. If EDM needs cap space to make moves work and he is the expendable one that no other team is paying for, he is a dump. He has no value to CHI. He is not a long term piece. We don't want him outside of being paid to take his salary. That is a dump. BUT if you can find another team to take him, go for it. This proposal still needs to pay for dumping Campbell AND all the pieces EDM is getting back. And that isn't even NEARLY enough to dump Campbell without all those pieces CHI is sending.
Oilers_29 a aimé ceci.
24 nov. 2023 à 18 h 28
#23
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2023
Messages: 1,285
Mentions "j'aime": 357
Quoting: Garak
I'm gonna go ahead and call a spade a spade here. Ceci is a cap dump. If EDM needs cap space to make moves work and he is the expendable one that no other team is paying for, he is a dump. He has no value to CHI. He is not a long term piece. We don't want him outside of being paid to take his salary. That is a dump. BUT if you can find another team to take him, go for it. This proposal still needs to pay for dumping Campbell AND all the pieces EDM is getting back. And that isn't even NEARLY enough to dump Campbell without all those pieces CHI is sending.


I don’t think he is a cap dump and is a solid top 4RD but I can u derstand why he would have no value to CHI
Garak a aimé ceci.
24 nov. 2023 à 18 h 34
#24
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 10,909
Mentions "j'aime": 10,702
Quoting: Oilers_29
I don’t think he is a cap dump and is a solid top 4RD but I can u derstand why he would have no value to CHI


For sure. It has more to do with the fact that CHI is currently in the business of collecting draft capital, young players, and luck of the draw cap dumps. Dickinson, for example, he was going nowhere fast with VAN. They paid us to take on his salary. We had zero expectations for him and were just happy to get the picks and creating some roster space at LHD by moving Stillman. Low and behold Dickinson bounced back in a Hawks sweater and we are likely gonna get to double dip moving him at the TDL and getting more assets. And that is the kind of stuff KD is looking to do at this point in the rebuild. Although, anyones guess is as good as mine when the pivot away from those tactics is going to come and he starts paying for assets to build our roster up.
Oilers_29 a aimé ceci.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage