SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Jets

Créé par: WheelDealHockey
Équipe: 2023-24 Jets de Winnipeg
Date de création initiale: 18 sept. 2023
Publié: 21 sept. 2023
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Transactions
1.
WPG
  1. Duclair, Anthony
  2. Choix de 4e ronde en 2025 (WPG)
SJS
  1. Gustafsson, David
  2. Schmidt, Nate
  3. Choix de 3e ronde en 2024 (WPG)
2.
Rachats de contrats
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2024
Logo de WPG
Logo de MTL
Logo de WPG
Logo de WPG
Logo de WPG
Logo de WPG
2025
Logo de WPG
Logo de WPG
Logo de WPG
Logo de WPG
Logo de WPG
Logo de WPG
Logo de WPG
2026
Logo de WPG
Logo de WPG
Logo de WPG
Logo de WPG
Logo de WPG
Logo de WPG
Logo de WPG
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2283 500 000 $78 321 191 $0 $1 275 000 $5 178 809 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Jets de Winnipeg
7 142 857 $7 142 857 $
AG
UFA - 3
Logo de Jets de Winnipeg
6 125 000 $6 125 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo de Jets de Winnipeg
3 437 500 $3 437 500 $
AD, C
RFA - 2
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Jets de Winnipeg
894 167 $894 167 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
AG, C
RFA - 1
Logo de Jets de Winnipeg
6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
AD, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Jets de Winnipeg
4 000 000 $4 000 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Jets de Winnipeg
3 250 000 $3 250 000 $
C
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Jets de Winnipeg
4 000 000 $4 000 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Jets de Winnipeg
1 350 000 $1 350 000 $
AG, AD
RFA - 2
Logo de Jets de Winnipeg
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
C, AG, AD
RFA - 2
Logo de Jets de Winnipeg
2 166 667 $2 166 667 $
AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Jets de Winnipeg
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
AG, AD, C
UFA - 2
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Jets de Winnipeg
6 250 000 $6 250 000 $
DG
NMC
UFA - 5
Logo de Jets de Winnipeg
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Jets de Winnipeg
6 166 667 $6 166 667 $
G
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo de Jets de Winnipeg
1 400 000 $1 400 000 $
DG
RFA - 2
Logo de Jets de Winnipeg
3 900 000 $3 900 000 $
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Jets de Winnipeg
1 750 000 $1 750 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Jets de Winnipeg
863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance425 000 $$425K)
DG
RFA - 1
Logo de Jets de Winnipeg
5 875 000 $5 875 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
DG/DD, AG
RFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
21 sept. 2023 à 16 h 37
#1
KFTW
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2018
Messages: 44,060
Mentions "j'aime": 24,743
Ottawa isn’t doing that
Mike7856 a aimé ceci.
21 sept. 2023 à 16 h 58
#2
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2018
Messages: 7,330
Mentions "j'aime": 3,636
Quoting: csick
Ottawa isn’t doing that


Yeah, we'd be downgrading our defence and still wouldn't have nearly enough space to sign Pinto.
csick a aimé ceci.
21 sept. 2023 à 17 h 0
#3
Stovetop
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2017
Messages: 2,122
Mentions "j'aime": 938
Why in the world would SJ do this.

Duclair is the better player between him and Schmidt and less contract commitment being an pending UFA. Literally ADDs 3 mil to the the Sharks cap. Gustafsson is literally just taking up a roster spot that could be used for a much better player. Then the audacity to have the Sharks send back a 4th lol
Emil_Ismo a aimé ceci.
21 sept. 2023 à 17 h 2
#4
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2016
Messages: 10,514
Mentions "j'aime": 3,728
Quoting: csick
Ottawa isn’t doing that


Quoting: sens65
Yeah, we'd be downgrading our defence and still wouldn't have nearly enough space to sign Pinto.

People in general don’t know that Brannstrom is actually quality. Probably because he didn’t take the league by the storm like he was hyped to do
sens65 a aimé ceci.
21 sept. 2023 à 17 h 15
#5
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2022
Messages: 4,109
Mentions "j'aime": 1,473
Quoting: Xspyrit
People in general don’t know that Brannstrom is actually quality. Probably because he didn’t take the league by the storm like he was hyped to do


16 minutes of ice time I don't think he's actually quality anymore and more what he is. He's behind 3 defenseman and won't be playing above zub as having all of the top 4 d left shot is just not what they should do. He likely tops out as a 4th/5th dman, some potential to be pp2 on a team and be okay 5v5 but he isn't worth nearly what you think rn that's for sure
21 sept. 2023 à 19 h 42
#6
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2016
Messages: 10,514
Mentions "j'aime": 3,728
Quoting: Howie
16 minutes of ice time I don't think he's actually quality anymore and more what he is. He's behind 3 defenseman and won't be playing above zub as having all of the top 4 d left shot is just not what they should do. He likely tops out as a 4th/5th dman, some potential to be pp2 on a team and be okay 5v5 but he isn't worth nearly what you think rn that's for sure

Well, good example of what I was talking about

Minutes played to evaluate a player? That's it? I mean, don't you think it's contextual with two 8 M$ D-men playing in front of him?

I have no of which 3 defenseman you're talking about because it's 2 and you mentioning Zub prove that you don't even know which side he plays on.

And "be okay 5v5" also proves that you don't know because he actually had some of the best 5v5 metrics in the league

He's going to be traded in the near future to stop blocking him much longer and because there's a guy named Tyler Kleven coming up

Finally, sorry if I think he's worth more than Logan freaking Stanley
22 sept. 2023 à 8 h 47
#7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2022
Messages: 4,109
Mentions "j'aime": 1,473
Quoting: Xspyrit
Well, good example of what I was talking about

Minutes played to evaluate a player? That's it? I mean, don't you think it's contextual with two 8 M$ D-men playing in front of him?

I have no of which 3 defenseman you're talking about because it's 2 and you mentioning Zub prove that you don't even know which side he plays on.

And "be okay 5v5" also proves that you don't know because he actually had some of the best 5v5 metrics in the league

He's going to be traded in the near future to stop blocking him much longer and because there's a guy named Tyler Kleven coming up

Finally, sorry if I think he's worth more than Logan freaking Stanley


He is currently behind chabot, Sanderson, Chychrun and zub. He isn't going to be an elite dman let alone he may not become a top 4 dman and that's fine atleast he's an nhl dman. You should really prepare yourself for a lower return than you expect maybe put the bias aside on this one.
22 sept. 2023 à 9 h 7
#8
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2016
Messages: 10,514
Mentions "j'aime": 3,728
Modifié 24 sept. 2023 à 7 h 58
Quoting: Howie
He is currently behind chabot, Sanderson, Chychrun and zub. He isn't going to be an elite dman let alone he may not become a top 4 dman and that's fine atleast he's an nhl dman. You should really prepare yourself for a lower return than you expect maybe put the bias aside on this one.

You don't have to be elite to be worth more than the guy below. That has nothing to do with bias. Saying to someone you're biased if you expect a better return than Logan Stanley is quite ridiculous

F37bE2GWkAA1HNj?format=jpg&name=medium

Also, Chychrun and Zub will most likely both play on RD. Brannstrom play LD in Ottawa so he's only behind Chabot and Sanderson. It looks like you're not even at defensive sides level

And again, his advanced metrics and play on the ice all suggest that he was already too good for a 3rd pairing so yes he could be on the 2nd pair of many teams already
22 sept. 2023 à 11 h 45
#9
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2022
Messages: 4,109
Mentions "j'aime": 1,473
Quoting: Xspyrit
You don't have to be elite to be worth more than the guy below. That has nothing to do with bias. Saying to someone you're biased if you expect a better return than Logan Stanley is quite ridiculous

F37bE2GWkAA1HNj?format=jpg&name=medium

Also, Chychrun and Zub will most likely both play on RD. Brannstrom play LD in Ottawa so he's only behind Chabot and Sanderson. It looks like you're not at defensive sides level anymore

And again, his advanced metrics and play on the ice all suggest that he was already too good for a 3rd pairing so yes he could be on the 2nd pair of many teams already


Nah he's 3rd pair
22 sept. 2023 à 12 h 5
#10
Lets go fishing
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2023
Messages: 417
Mentions "j'aime": 216
I don't think the Jets are interested in moving Schmidt to be honest. He's a great locker room presence and did a solid job babysitting Samberg last year. He's costs a lot, but it's not like he can't stay in the lineup.
24 sept. 2023 à 8 h 1
#11
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2016
Messages: 10,514
Mentions "j'aime": 3,728
Quoting: Howie
Nah he's 3rd pair

On teams with 2 better LHDs yes. But several teams don't

He can also play RD but Dorion and DJ Smith don't want to
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage