SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Another Laffy to MTL ACGM

Créé par: V1NnY2
Équipe: 2023-24 Canadiens de Montréal
Date de création initiale: 11 août 2023
Publié: 11 août 2023
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
I know the likelihood of something like this to happen is probably zero, but it’s still interesting to see what could be done to make it make sense for both teams
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
43 750 000 $
Transactions
MTL
  1. Goodrow, Barclay
  2. Lafrenière, Alexis [Droits de RFA]
  3. Mackey, Connor
Détails additionnels:
Goodrow needs a fresh start and is more a cap casualty in this trade than anything else.
Laffy is still unproven in the NHL but didn’t really have a chance yet also. MTL seems like a better place for him in terms of opportunity. He’s obviously the player with the most untapped potential in this trade, but NYR get good value for him: a potential top4 LHD, a middle 6 winger with top 6 upside, top 6 power forward, a B prospect and a first round pick.
Mackey is basically a throw in to even out contracts and roster spots.
NYR
  1. Anderson, Josh (1 500 000 $ retained)
  2. Harris, Jordan
  3. Harvey-Pinard, Rafaël
  4. Ylönen, Jesse
  5. Choix de 1e ronde en 2025 (CGY)
Détails additionnels:
Harris: could be a quality top 4 LHD for many years for NYR. He can already earn quality minutes with a reasonable 1.4M$ cap hit. Would be a great insurance policy if NYR can’t re-sign Lindgren.
Harvey-Pinard: 14 G in 34 G last year is definitely not sustainable for him, but it clearly shows he has a lot of upside and will be very affordable for the next two years at 1.1 M$. Middle 6 forward with lots of upside (has always performed when given an opportunity.
Anderson: a true power forward with blazing speed. Can score 20-25 G if used properly and with the retention for 4 years, his cap hit becomes more than reasonable.
Ylonen: could be a wild card in this trade. NYR has very limited depth (both in NHL and in their system in general) at RW.
The first round pick would be conditional: the lowest of their 2 firsts. However, if both firsts picks are in the top 10, it becomes a 2026 unprotected first. If MTL trades one of the two 2025 picks, the other 2025 pick becomes unprotected.
Rachats de contrats
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2024
Logo de MTL
Logo de COL
Logo de MTL
Logo de MIN
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
Logo de SJS
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
Logo de EDM
Logo de WSH
2025
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
Logo de PIT
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
2026
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2383 500 000 $74 032 083 $1 170 000 $4 210 000 $9 467 917 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
7 850 000 $7 850 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 8
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
7 875 000 $7 875 000 $
C
UFA - 7
3 750 000 $3 750 000 $
AG, AD
RFA - 2
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
1 985 000 $1 985 000 $ (Bonis de performance15 000 $$15K)
C, AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
3 362 500 $3 362 500 $
C, AD
RFA - 3
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
950 000 $950 000 $ (Bonis de performance3 500 000 $$4M)
AD, AG
RFA - 2
Logo de Rangers de New York
3 641 667 $3 641 667 $
C, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
2 900 000 $2 900 000 $
C, AG
RFA - 4
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
6 500 000 $6 500 000 $
AD, AG
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 4
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
812 500 $812 500 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
1 700 000 $1 700 000 $
C
UFA - 2
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
3 400 000 $3 400 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 2
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
4 875 000 $4 875 000 $
DG
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
2 343 750 $2 343 750 $
DD
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 2
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
1 925 000 $1 925 000 $
G
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance420 000 $$420K)
DG/DD
RFA - 2
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
DD
UFA - 2
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
1 800 000 $1 800 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
828 333 $828 333 $
DG/DD
RFA - 1
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance275 000 $$275K)
DD
RFA - 1
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Rangers de New York
775 000 $775 000 $
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
766 667 $766 667 $
DD
UFA - 2
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
4 450 000 $4 450 000 $
C
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
10 500 000 $10 500 000 $
G
NMC
UFA - 3
Équipe de réserve
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
950 000 $950 000 $ (0 $$00 $$0) (Bonis de performance1 000 000 $$1M)
DD
RFA - 3
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
885 000 $885 000 $ (0 $$00 $$0) (Bonis de performance80 000 $$80K)
C
RFA - 3
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
918 333 $918 333 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
AD, C
RFA - 3

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
11 août 2023 à 10 h 32
#1
Soggy
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2023
Messages: 502
Mentions "j'aime": 162
Off the bat this trade won't work cause Goodrow probably has all of Canada on his 15 team NTC.
Let's say he waives though. I don't like this trade from the Rangers' prospective. The value is there but none of the pieces you're sending are exciting. It's just a 1st + a lot of B prospects + a middle 6 forward who I would take Laf over. Rangers are trying to win a cup now and this won't make them better. Laf has been disappointing so far yes, but he's still put up about half a point per game in the NHL and the Rangers still view his ceiling as very high. The prospects you send over don't seem close to that ceiling, most of them maxing out as middle 6 forwards and bottom 4 dmen. Harvey-Pinard is interesting but he's also already 24.

If I were Drury I'd much rather see a trade with one A prospect and a 1st.
aedoran a aimé ceci.
11 août 2023 à 10 h 39
#2
Sennecke is a gem
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2022
Messages: 4,199
Mentions "j'aime": 2,311
That is a VERY generous offer for Laffy. Don’t know about that one…
11 août 2023 à 10 h 42
#3
Démarrer sujet
V1NnY2
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2018
Messages: 356
Mentions "j'aime": 104
Quoting: GoofyFoFoofy
Off the bat this trade won't work cause Goodrow probably has all of Canada on his 15 team NTC.
Let's say he waives though. I don't like this trade from the Rangers' prospective. The value is there but none of the pieces you're sending are exciting. It's just a 1st + a lot of B prospects + a middle 6 forward who I would take Laf over. Rangers are trying to win a cup now and this won't make them better. Laf has been disappointing so far yes, but he's still put up about half a point per game in the NHL and the Rangers still view his ceiling as very high. The prospects you send over don't seem close to that ceiling, most of them maxing out as middle 6 forwards and bottom 4 dmen. Harvey-Pinard is interesting but he's also already 24.

If I were Drury I'd much rather see a trade with one A prospect and a 1st.


The thing I would disagree with what you said is “this trade won’t make them better”.

Anderson is an upgrade over Goodrow
Harris is significantly better than Mackey
Harvey-Pinard produced more than Laffy in limited NHL time (although very unlikely he keeps this pace as I mentioned). Obviously Laffy has more value and upside but you get my point.

From my perspective, NYR get better in the short term with a much deeper lineup (plus add a B prospect in Ylonen and a first that could be top-15).

Adding a top prospect and a first does not help them in the short term so I think the only kind of deal that makes sense for NYR is something like that: quality depth players at very reasonable cap hits (Tampa Bay style trade).
11 août 2023 à 10 h 48
#4
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2017
Messages: 21,729
Mentions "j'aime": 12,063
Quoting: GoofyFoFoofy
Off the bat this trade won't work cause Goodrow probably has all of Canada on his 15 team NTC.
Let's say he waives though. I don't like this trade from the Rangers' prospective. The value is there but none of the pieces you're sending are exciting. It's just a 1st + a lot of B prospects + a middle 6 forward who I would take Laf over. Rangers are trying to win a cup now and this won't make them better. Laf has been disappointing so far yes, but he's still put up about half a point per game in the NHL and the Rangers still view his ceiling as very high. The prospects you send over don't seem close to that ceiling, most of them maxing out as middle 6 forwards and bottom 4 dmen. Harvey-Pinard is interesting but he's also already 24.

If I were Drury I'd much rather see a trade with one A prospect and a 1st.


Is Kenny Holland in NY now? Giving bottom 6 forwards NTCs is his specialty.
11 août 2023 à 11 h 4
#5
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2022
Messages: 4,050
Mentions "j'aime": 1,451
Quoting: V1NnY2
The thing I would disagree with what you said is “this trade won’t make them better”.

Anderson is an upgrade over Goodrow
Harris is significantly better than Mackey
Harvey-Pinard produced more than Laffy in limited NHL time (although very unlikely he keeps this pace as I mentioned). Obviously Laffy has more value and upside but you get my point.

From my perspective, NYR get better in the short term with a much deeper lineup (plus add a B prospect in Ylonen and a first that could be top-15).

Adding a top prospect and a first does not help them in the short term so I think the only kind of deal that makes sense for NYR is something like that: quality depth players at very reasonable cap hits (Tampa Bay style trade).


Firstly Mackie is nyr depth dman not starting so Harris is not really a need.
Next Anderson is overpaid and frankly who will have a better season next year Laffy or Anderson. You mention that Anderson is better than goodrow but that's not the player he's replacing lol.
As mentioned in many agms before and here as well nyr aren't trading Laffy for a return that isn't a homerun of a return and this is more of a ground out.
11 août 2023 à 11 h 15
#6
Démarrer sujet
V1NnY2
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2018
Messages: 356
Mentions "j'aime": 104
Quoting: Howie
Firstly Mackie is nyr depth dman not starting so Harris is not really a need.
Next Anderson is overpaid and frankly who will have a better season next year Laffy or Anderson. You mention that Anderson is better than goodrow but that's not the player he's replacing lol.
As mentioned in many agms before and here as well nyr aren't trading Laffy for a return that isn't a homerun of a return and this is more of a ground out.


Harris is also an upgrade over Gustafsson and would be a great insurance policy if NYR can’t re-sign Lindgren.

Also, if you say that Anderson doesn’t replace Goodrow, you can’t start making a one vs one comparison with Laffy.
You say Anderson is overpaid but seem to forget I included a 1.5M$ retention so 4M$ for a 20-25G power forward is more than reasonable.

You need to take a step back and look at the trade as a whole. The Rangers would be a better team for the next two years with this package and their time is now, not in five years.
11 août 2023 à 11 h 20
#7
Soggy
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2023
Messages: 502
Mentions "j'aime": 162
Quoting: V1NnY2
The thing I would disagree with what you said is “this trade won’t make them better”.

Anderson is an upgrade over Goodrow
Harris is significantly better than Mackey
Harvey-Pinard produced more than Laffy in limited NHL time (although very unlikely he keeps this pace as I mentioned). Obviously Laffy has more value and upside but you get my point.

From my perspective, NYR get better in the short term with a much deeper lineup (plus add a B prospect in Ylonen and a first that could be top-15).

Adding a top prospect and a first does not help them in the short term so I think the only kind of deal that makes sense for NYR is something like that: quality depth players at very reasonable cap hits (Tampa Bay style trade).


Ok well the Rangers aren't gonna trade for anyone to specifically replace Goodrow. They already have players in the system who can replace him he's just a 4th liner with 3rd liner upside. Like you said Harvey-Pinard is unlikely to keep up his production, he had a good season in the NHL sure but he's also already 24 there's not much room for development at that age. And the rest are B-level prospects.

Lafreniere leaves a much bigger hole in the lineup than Goodrow would, Anderson is not an upgrade over Laf.

Also Mackey is a non-roster player for the Rangers they don't need anyone replacing him.
11 août 2023 à 11 h 22
#8
Soggy
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2023
Messages: 502
Mentions "j'aime": 162
Quoting: V1NnY2
Harris is also an upgrade over Gustafsson and would be a great insurance policy if NYR can’t re-sign Lindgren.

Also, if you say that Anderson doesn’t replace Goodrow, you can’t start making a one vs one comparison with Laffy.
You say Anderson is overpaid but seem to forget I included a 1.5M$ retention so 4M$ for a 20-25G power forward is more than reasonable.

You need to take a step back and look at the trade as a whole. The Rangers would be a better team for the next two years with this package and their time is now, not in five years.


Harris is not an upgrade over Gustaffson, Gustaffson just had a monster season in Washington where he put up 38 points in 61 games while being good defensively. I view Harris as a about equal to Schneider in skill, and Schneider is younger so there's no reason to put him there.
11 août 2023 à 11 h 25
#9
Soggy
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2023
Messages: 502
Mentions "j'aime": 162
Quoting: aedoran
Is Kenny Holland in NY now? Giving bottom 6 forwards NTCs is his specialty.


Drury made a lot of mistakes in his first offseason lol. Signed Goodrow to that contract then traded Buchnevich for pennies. He hasn't done anything stupid since then luckily.
aedoran a aimé ceci.
11 août 2023 à 11 h 44
#10
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2017
Messages: 6,731
Mentions "j'aime": 1,559
Goodrow
Quoting: GoofyFoFoofy
Drury made a lot of mistakes in his first offseason lol. Signed Goodrow to that contract then traded Buchnevich for pennies. He hasn't done anything stupid since then luckily.


Nemeth signing, Reaves trade, Harpur Signing, Lesychshyn claim, Kane trade, we can go on... He's been a bottom 10 GM in the league objectively.
11 août 2023 à 11 h 49
#11
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2017
Messages: 6,731
Mentions "j'aime": 1,559
Goodrow for Anderson (2m retained) is an interesting idea since they've been comparably valued the last few seasons.

Edge might go to Goodrow for position, but it's close.
V1NnY2 a aimé ceci.
11 août 2023 à 13 h 29
#12
Soggy
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2023
Messages: 502
Mentions "j'aime": 162
Quoting: Sagecoll
Goodrow

Nemeth signing, Reaves trade, Harpur Signing, Lesychshyn claim, Kane trade, we can go on... He's been a bottom 10 GM in the league objectively.


Nemeth and Reaves was in that same offseason. Harpur and Lesychyn are non-factor replacement level players that played only like 60 games combined. Kane he got for almost no assets, it turned out badly but that's not a move I blame him for since the price was so low to get Kane. I don't think he's a bottom 10 GM when he had already inherited a tough contract situation and he's consistently found ways to improve our roster even with us being so up against the cap.
11 août 2023 à 13 h 51
#13
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2017
Messages: 6,731
Mentions "j'aime": 1,559
Quoting: GoofyFoFoofy
Nemeth and Reaves was in that same offseason. Harpur and Lesychyn are non-factor replacement level players that played only like 60 games combined. Kane he got for almost no assets, it turned out badly but that's not a move I blame him for since the price was so low to get Kane. I don't think he's a bottom 10 GM when he had already inherited a tough contract situation and he's consistently found ways to improve our roster even with us being so up against the cap.


Harpur and Leschyshyn were both strong negative factors. Kane got moved for a 2nd+. That’s a significant asset. He paid a higher price than he could’ve gotten him for which was absolutely nothing since he refused to play elsewhere.
He did not inherit a tough contract situation at all. He put himself in one.
If the Rangers had Tom Fitzgerald and the Devils had Chris Drury, the Devils would be a lottery team and the Rangers would have a cup and be contenders for more for the next decade.
11 août 2023 à 14 h 7
#14
Soggy
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2023
Messages: 502
Mentions "j'aime": 162
Quoting: Sagecoll
Harpur and Leschyshyn were both strong negative factors. Kane got moved for a 2nd+. That’s a significant asset. He paid a higher price than he could’ve gotten him for which was absolutely nothing since he refused to play elsewhere.
He did not inherit a tough contract situation at all. He put himself in one.
If the Rangers had Tom Fitzgerald and the Devils had Chris Drury, the Devils would be a lottery team and the Rangers would have a cup and be contenders for more for the next decade.


How were Harpur and Leschyshyn negative factors lol? They're replacement level players that every team has, them playing 8 minutes a night for like 30 games each isn't gonna change anything. Getting Kane for a 2nd was a good deal, lots of other fans of teams were saying we got a huge bargain when it happened. We also couldn't have gotten Kane for nothing, that's not how this league works. Chicago can always come back and say "yeah we're not trading him at all unless you give us X and X", that's what ended up happening to similar players who forced their way to specific teams like Nash and Hall. He also did not put himself in a tough contract situation, the Goodrow contract definitely didn't help but 3.6m out of 82m isn't much of a factor meanwhile we have Trouba making 8m and Panarin making 11.5 from Gorton's era. Sure the Trocheck and Zibanejad contracts won't age well but they'll be good value for a good 4-5 more years. And the Fox contract is great value.
11 août 2023 à 14 h 23
#15
Exhausted Ranger Fan
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2021
Messages: 1,043
Mentions "j'aime": 451
Nothing of value here
11 août 2023 à 14 h 33
#16
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2017
Messages: 21,729
Mentions "j'aime": 12,063
Quoting: GoofyFoFoofy
Drury made a lot of mistakes in his first offseason lol. Signed Goodrow to that contract then traded Buchnevich for pennies. He hasn't done anything stupid since then luckily.


I was taking a shot at Holland and I meant no disrespect toward Drury, so I apologize for that.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage