SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Duchene Trade

Créé par: HockeyNM1510
Équipe: 2017-18 Ducks d'Anaheim
Date de création initiale: 28 juin 2017
Publié: 28 juin 2017
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
2825 000 $
2825 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
11 000 000 $
1775 000 $
1775 000 $
1775 000 $
1900 000 $
2825 000 $
Transactions
Rachats de contrats
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2018
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
2019
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
2020
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2375 000 000 $64 942 583 $0 $0 $10 057 417 $

Formation

Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
3 150 000 $3 150 000 $
AD, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 3
8 250 000 $8 250 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 4
8 625 000 $8 625 000 $
AD
NMC
UFA - 4
2 463 139 $2 463 139 $
AD, AG
UFA - 5
5 250 000 $5 250 000 $
AD, C
UFA - 2
3 750 000 $3 750 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 2
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
AG
NTC
UFA - 1
6 875 000 $6 875 000 $
C, AD
NMC
UFA - 5
670 000 $670 000 $
AD
UFA - 1
650 000 $650 000 $
AG
UFA - 1
1 750 000 $1 750 000 $
C, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 1
637 500 $637 500 $
AD, C
UFA - 1
650 000 $650 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
2 602 778 $2 602 778 $
DG
UFA - 5
925 000 $925 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
2 300 000 $2 300 000 $
G
UFA - 2
4 000 000 $4 000 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1
825 000 $825 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
894 166 $894 166 $
DG
UFA - 3
825 000 $825 000 $
DG
UFA - 2
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
G
UFA - 2
900 000 $900 000 $
DD
UFA - 2
4 000 000 $4 000 000 $
DD
NMC
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
28 juin 2017 à 12 h 38
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2017
Messages: 1,457
Mentions "j'aime": 462
This has been discussed to death. Duchene isn't going to be a Duck. COL doesn't need Vatanen because they have Barrie. They've already reportedly turned down a better package from NYI in Pulock + Barzal + 1st. If ANA did make contact with COL asking about Duchene, I'm sure the ask would be Lindholm or Fowler. Personally, that's an easy "no" for me. No need to move out D-men that we need for luxury centre depth that we really don't need.
goldie078 a aimé ceci.
28 juin 2017 à 12 h 53
#2
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2017
Messages: 2,161
Mentions "j'aime": 229
Quoting: mytduxfan
This has been discussed to death. Duchene isn't going to be a Duck. COL doesn't need Vatanen because they have Barrie. They've already reportedly turned down a better package from NYI in Pulock + Barzal + 1st. If ANA did make contact with COL asking about Duchene, I'm sure the ask would be Lindholm or Fowler. Personally, that's an easy "no" for me. No need to move out D-men that we need for luxury centre depth that we really don't need.


Well if they are asking for Lindholm then I can see why Sakic can't trade Duchene or anyone for that matter. Vatanen can play the left side.
28 juin 2017 à 13 h 21
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2017
Messages: 493
Mentions "j'aime": 30
Replace Nattinen and Petterson with 2 first round picks to turn an easy COL no into a yes.

Sakic may become desperate, but he doesn't have to be a genius to pick the best offer available
28 juin 2017 à 16 h 22
#4
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2017
Messages: 217
Mentions "j'aime": 7
Quoting: HockeyNM1510
Quoting: mytduxfan
This has been discussed to death. Duchene isn't going to be a Duck. COL doesn't need Vatanen because they have Barrie. They've already reportedly turned down a better package from NYI in Pulock + Barzal + 1st. If ANA did make contact with COL asking about Duchene, I'm sure the ask would be Lindholm or Fowler. Personally, that's an easy "no" for me. No need to move out D-men that we need for luxury centre depth that we really don't need.


Well if they are asking for Lindholm then I can see why Sakic can't trade Duchene or anyone for that matter. Vatanen can play the left side.


Barrie can play on the left side as well. I think Ritchie+Vatanen is a solid trade core.
28 juin 2017 à 18 h 10
#5
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2017
Messages: 1,457
Mentions "j'aime": 462
Quoting: HockeyNM1510
Quoting: mytduxfan
This has been discussed to death. Duchene isn't going to be a Duck. COL doesn't need Vatanen because they have Barrie. They've already reportedly turned down a better package from NYI in Pulock + Barzal + 1st. If ANA did make contact with COL asking about Duchene, I'm sure the ask would be Lindholm or Fowler. Personally, that's an easy "no" for me. No need to move out D-men that we need for luxury centre depth that we really don't need.


Well if they are asking for Lindholm then I can see why Sakic can't trade Duchene or anyone for that matter. Vatanen can play the left side.


Since when? Vatanen is a RH, right side D-man. Yeah, Vatanen can play left side, but not well and nowhere near as good as right side.

Lindholm and Fowler would be the ask from ANA. I'm sure a variety of different offers are being explored.
28 juin 2017 à 18 h 12
#6
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2017
Messages: 1,457
Mentions "j'aime": 462
Quoting: Campbell
Quoting: HockeyNM1510


Well if they are asking for Lindholm then I can see why Sakic can't trade Duchene or anyone for that matter. Vatanen can play the left side.


Barrie can play on the left side as well. I think Ritchie+Vatanen is a solid trade core.


Don't see it personally. Too many PMDs on COL backline and not enough good quality D-first guys.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage