Modifié 22 juill. 2023 à 13 h 0
Quoting: LivingAnew
Wow, this is a tough one... I'm REALLY high on Raddysh, BUT... the Hawks have such a deficit of "ready," young, RD players that I think they'd do this. Absent this, they have a LONG wait for their RDs to move up to the NHL. Plus, it's NEXT YEAR's draft that supposed to be so strong in defensemen.
Considering how long it takes for defensemen to come into their own in the NHL, I'd do it. They have many high picks going forward, already. (Not that I'm against those; they're great to have!) This could fill a gap in our RD age groups (i.e., between aging vets and prospects being a long ways off.)
IMHO, of course. Others' mileage may vary...
For sure. We'll see. I don't know if the pick accumulation was just an early rebuild tactic, or if he just prefers picks in general. So, it's hard to say what he would or wouldn't do. Like you said, D take a while, and we don't really have any on the way for quite a while. Allan could end up on the right side, he has played there at various levels and I've heard talk multiple times that he could be on option on his off side. Then Rinzel will probably play at least two years in college. Krutil probably doesn't get a contract, and Kelley will probably need a few years in the AHL, if he even gets a contract out of college.
So, yeah, looking around the league might become necessary. Although, we still have 3 years of Murphy and 7 years of Jones. Third pairing could always be filled in free agency, or maybe they snag someone higher end that bumps Murphy down to the 3rd pairing. Which kind of sucks to push him further down in a sense, but if a guy like Murph is your 3rd pair RD, that is not a bad position to be in. But, I just think, until CHI is nearing a level of SERIOUS playoff contention, the probably stick to accumulating picks and building through drafting/development. RD is only a concern looking ahead more than 3 years, we really don't need anyone "right now", though.