SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Cap compliant roster with 22 players

Créé par: BigTramFan
Équipe: 2023-24 Maple Leafs de Toronto
Date de création initiale: 10 juill. 2023
Publié: 22 juill. 2023
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
Edited for Samsonov's correct cap hit
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
UFAANSCAP HIT
13 550 000 $
Transactions
1.
2.
3.
Rachats de contrats
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2024
Logo de TOR
Logo de NYI
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de CHI
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de OTT
2025
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de CHI
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
2026
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2283 500 000 $83 330 616 $0 $0 $169 384 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
5 500 000 $5 500 000 $
AG, AD
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
11 640 250 $11 640 250 $
C
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
10 903 000 $10 903 000 $
AD
NMC
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
925 000 $925 000 $
AG, AD
RFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
11 000 000 $11 000 000 $
C, AG
NMC
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
6 962 366 $6 962 366 $
AD
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
C, AD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
800 000 $800 000 $
C, AG
RFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
758 333 $758 333 $
AD
RFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
775 000 $775 000 $
AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
2 400 000 $2 400 000 $
C
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
1 350 000 $1 350 000 $
AD
UFA - 3
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
775 000 $775 000 $
C
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
7 500 000 $7 500 000 $
DG
NMC
UFA - 7
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
DG/DD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
3 550 000 $3 550 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
DG/DD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
4 150 000 $4 150 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
766 667 $766 667 $
G
RFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
800 000 $800 000 $
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
1 100 000 $1 100 000 $
DD
RFA - 2
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
987 500 $987 500 $
DG/DD, AG
UFA - 1
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
5 625 000 $5 625 000 $
DG
M-NTC
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
22 juill. 2023 à 1 h 22
#1
Chicago
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2015
Messages: 6,999
Mentions "j'aime": 2,846
I'm really high on Lily so i'd jump on that if i'm Chicago, but not sure they would.
BigTramFan, Garak et LivingAnew a aimé ceci.
22 juill. 2023 à 2 h 2
#2
Let Him Cook
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2021
Messages: 4,011
Mentions "j'aime": 962
we want dakota. also swap holmberg w kampf.
22 juill. 2023 à 6 h 13
#3
Démarrer sujet
BigTramFan
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2019
Messages: 396
Mentions "j'aime": 86
Quoting: JAKE6
we want dakota. also swap holmberg w kampf.


Title is "cap compliant"...Joshua don't fit
22 juill. 2023 à 9 h 12
#4
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 10,836
Mentions "j'aime": 10,610
Quoting: NickC1988
I'm really high on Lily so i'd jump on that if i'm Chicago, but not sure they would.


Yeah. I feel like they have a pretty similar level of upside, for being two completely different positions. I'd bet Davidson would want a pick for Raddysh, though.
LivingAnew a aimé ceci.
22 juill. 2023 à 9 h 19
#5
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2021
Messages: 1,267
Mentions "j'aime": 1,096
Colorado REALLY wants to say yes but this move puts them slightly over the cap as well. We would still strongly consider this and figure out a way to get ourselves back under.
22 juill. 2023 à 11 h 10
#6
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2023
Messages: 405
Mentions "j'aime": 525
Quoting: Garak
Yeah. I feel like they have a pretty similar level of upside, for being two completely different positions. I'd bet Davidson would want a pick for Raddysh, though.


Wow, this is a tough one... I'm REALLY high on Raddysh, BUT... the Hawks have such a deficit of "ready," young, RD players that I think they'd do this. Absent this, they have a LONG wait for their RDs to move up to the NHL. Plus, it's NEXT YEAR's draft that supposed to be so strong in defensemen.

Considering how long it takes for defensemen to come into their own in the NHL, I'd do it. They have many high picks going forward, already. (Not that I'm against those; they're great to have!) This could fill a gap in our RD age groups (i.e., between aging vets and prospects being a long ways off.)

IMHO, of course. Others' mileage may vary... smile
Garak a aimé ceci.
22 juill. 2023 à 12 h 46
#7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 10,836
Mentions "j'aime": 10,610
Modifié 22 juill. 2023 à 13 h 0
Quoting: LivingAnew
Wow, this is a tough one... I'm REALLY high on Raddysh, BUT... the Hawks have such a deficit of "ready," young, RD players that I think they'd do this. Absent this, they have a LONG wait for their RDs to move up to the NHL. Plus, it's NEXT YEAR's draft that supposed to be so strong in defensemen.

Considering how long it takes for defensemen to come into their own in the NHL, I'd do it. They have many high picks going forward, already. (Not that I'm against those; they're great to have!) This could fill a gap in our RD age groups (i.e., between aging vets and prospects being a long ways off.)

IMHO, of course. Others' mileage may vary... smile


For sure. We'll see. I don't know if the pick accumulation was just an early rebuild tactic, or if he just prefers picks in general. So, it's hard to say what he would or wouldn't do. Like you said, D take a while, and we don't really have any on the way for quite a while. Allan could end up on the right side, he has played there at various levels and I've heard talk multiple times that he could be on option on his off side. Then Rinzel will probably play at least two years in college. Krutil probably doesn't get a contract, and Kelley will probably need a few years in the AHL, if he even gets a contract out of college.

So, yeah, looking around the league might become necessary. Although, we still have 3 years of Murphy and 7 years of Jones. Third pairing could always be filled in free agency, or maybe they snag someone higher end that bumps Murphy down to the 3rd pairing. Which kind of sucks to push him further down in a sense, but if a guy like Murph is your 3rd pair RD, that is not a bad position to be in. But, I just think, until CHI is nearing a level of SERIOUS playoff contention, the probably stick to accumulating picks and building through drafting/development. RD is only a concern looking ahead more than 3 years, we really don't need anyone "right now", though.
LivingAnew a aimé ceci.
22 juill. 2023 à 13 h 9
#8
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2023
Messages: 405
Mentions "j'aime": 525
Quoting: Garak
For sure. We'll see. I don't know if the pick accumulation was just an early rebuild tactic, or if he just prefers picks in general. So, it's hard to say what he would or wouldn't do. Like you said, D take a while, and we don't really have any on the way for quite a while. Allan could end up on the right side, he has played there at various levels and I've heard talk multiple times that he could be on option on his off side. Then Rinzel will probably play at least two years in college. Krutil probably doesn't get a contract, and Kelley will probably need a few years in the AHL, if he even gets a contract out of college.

So, yeah, looking around the league might become necessary. Although, we still have 3 years of Murphy and 7 years of Jones. Third pairing could always be filled in free agency, or maybe they snag someone higher end that bumps Murphy down to the 3rd pairing. Which kind of sucks to push him further down in a sense, but if a guy like Murph is your 3rd pair RD, that is not a bad position to be in. But, I just think, until CHI is nearing a level of SERIOUS playoff contention, the probably stick to accumulating picks and building through drafting/development. RD is only a concern looking ahead more than 3 years, we really don't need anyone "right now", though.


Yep. I'll be interesting to see how things go. I'd be against signing or trading for D that'd bump Murph down to 3rd pair, too, because his trade value might also decline. I can easily foresee a deal for Murph like McCabe got, that'd also return a 1st rounder.

For that matter, between him and Raddysh, the return in picks could/should be quite handsome. And, to your main point, we really don't need ANYONE right now, apart from those who would help the kids grow. There could be a parade of vets over the years who'd come here on short-term deals and get flipped for yet MORE picks at TDLs. Cheers
Garak a aimé ceci.
22 juill. 2023 à 13 h 21
#9
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 10,836
Mentions "j'aime": 10,610
Modifié 22 juill. 2023 à 13 h 26
Quoting: LivingAnew
Yep. I'll be interesting to see how things go. I'd be against signing or trading for D that'd bump Murph down to 3rd pair, too, because his trade value might also decline. I can easily foresee a deal for Murph like McCabe got, that'd also return a 1st rounder.

For that matter, between him and Raddysh, the return in picks could/should be quite handsome. And, to your main point, we really don't need ANYONE right now, apart from those who would help the kids grow. There could be a parade of vets over the years who'd come here on short-term deals and get flipped for yet MORE picks at TDLs. Cheers


For sure. As for bumping Murphy down, I was thinking of that as a next summer or the summer after type of thing, if he is still even with CHI at that point. But, yeah, I agree, I don't like bumping him down. I thought he looked great on the top pair before they acquired Jones. Seemed like he was really growing into that top 4 defensive dman role, before everything fell apart.

I also kind of wonder if they already have targets in mind for the future, maybe even preliminary discussions with other GM's about specific players for future trades. Everything KD does seems methodical and intentional. So, it wouldn't surprise me if that is why they didn't draft any RHD and traded away Mitchell and Regula.
LivingAnew a aimé ceci.
22 juill. 2023 à 13 h 50
#10
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2023
Messages: 405
Mentions "j'aime": 525
"Everything KD does seems methodical and intentional."

THIS. And until he does something dumb, I believe in how he's doing. LOL
Garak a aimé ceci.
22 juill. 2023 à 14 h 7
#11
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 10,836
Mentions "j'aime": 10,610
Quoting: LivingAnew
"Everything KD does seems methodical and intentional."

THIS. And until he does something dumb, I believe in how he's doing. LOL


Even when I don't agree with what he does or when I think he could've done better, I still get the impression that there is a purpose that I am just not privy to. Which is infuriating because I NEEEEED TO KNOW!!!!! haha
LivingAnew a aimé ceci.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage