SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Hanafin Comes Home

Créé par: CaptainBergeron
Équipe: 2023-24 Bruins de Boston
Date de création initiale: 24 juin 2023
Publié: 24 juin 2023
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
Bruins continue to mortgage their future

-Pittsburgh gets the most likely reigning Vezina Trophy winner and a Top 6 LW. I've seen recent ACGMs having him go for a 2nd or 3rd sometimes with POJ

-The blockbuster essentially sends Calgary Gryz and a 1st for Hanafin and Freddy, Lysell, + Harrison for Dube

-Seattle gets Forbort to replace Soucy and help their PK. There have been a handful of Kraken ACGMs without Geekie, so I figured this helps both teams in this scenario
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
2900 000 $
44 000 000 $
2900 000 $
22 000 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
31 500 000 $
11 500 000 $
1850 000 $
13 000 000 $
11 500 000 $
Transactions
1.
BOS
  1. Smith, Ty [Droits de RFA]
  2. Choix de 1e ronde en 2024 (PIT)
  3. Choix de 3e ronde en 2024 (VGK)
2.
3.
BOS
ARI
  1. Reilly, Mike
  2. Choix de 6e ronde en 2023 (BOS)
  3. Choix de 7e ronde en 2023 (BOS)
4.
BOS
  1. Choix de 6e ronde en 2023 (VAN)
5.
BOS
  1. Geekie, Morgan [Droits de RFA]
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2023
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de VAN
Logo de LAK
2024
Logo de VGK
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
2025
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2383 500 000 $78 925 000 $4 500 000 $0 $4 575 000 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Bruins de Boston
6 125 000 $6 125 000 $
AG
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Bruins de Boston
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
C
UFA
Logo de Bruins de Boston
4 000 000 $4 000 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
2 300 000 $2 300 000 $
AG, AD, C
RFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
4 750 000 $4 750 000 $
C, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo de Bruins de Boston
11 250 000 $11 250 000 $
AD
NMC
UFA - 8
Logo de Bruins de Boston
925 000 $925 000 $
AG
RFA - 2
Logo de Bruins de Boston
5 250 000 $5 250 000 $
C, AD
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 3
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
C, AD
RFA - 2
Logo de Bruins de Boston
900 000 $900 000 $
AG, AD
RFA - 2
Logo de Bruins de Boston
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
AG, C, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Bruins de Boston
800 000 $800 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
762 500 $762 500 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Flames de Calgary
1 237 500 $1 237 500 $
DG
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
9 500 000 $9 500 000 $
DD
UFA - 7
Logo de Bruins de Boston
4 000 000 $4 000 000 $
G
RFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
6 500 000 $6 500 000 $
DG
NTC, NMC
UFA - 7
Logo de Bruins de Boston
4 100 000 $4 100 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo de Bruins de Boston
775 000 $775 000 $
G
RFA - 1
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
DG
UFA - 1
900 000 $900 000 $
DG/DD
RFA - 1
850 000 $850 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
24 juin 2023 à 8 h 30
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2022
Messages: 8,925
Mentions "j'aime": 3,459
Modifié 24 juin 2023 à 8 h 35
What about doing DeBrusk for Hanifin instead, and then acquiring Scheifele, Lindholm, or some other C? Bergeron probably retires sooner rather than later. They might as well be ready if they are dealing Lysell.
24 juin 2023 à 9 h 6
#2
Syd Barret
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2018
Messages: 1,015
Mentions "j'aime": 489
In his presser yesterday Dubas specifically said he was going to weaponize cap space . Not give up premium assets to help a heated rival out of cap hell.
Drop the first or drop Smith and maybe you have a deal. Otherwise they aren't giving up two premium assets just to help a rival.
Hall is a shell of his former self and Ullmark has had one really good season. No point in taking on 11 million in cap AND giving up premium assets to a rival for two players that don't move the needle. Especially considering your coach doesn't even trust ullmark after the season he had.
24 juin 2023 à 9 h 11
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2022
Messages: 8,925
Mentions "j'aime": 3,459
Modifié 24 juin 2023 à 9 h 25
Quoting: pensburgh571
In his presser yesterday Dubas specifically said he was going to weaponize cap space . Not give up premium assets to help a heated rival out of cap hell.
Drop the first or drop Smith and maybe you have a deal. Otherwise they aren't giving up two premium assets just to help a rival.
Hall is a shell of his former self and Ullmark has had one really good season. No point in taking on 11 million in cap AND giving up premium assets to a rival for two players that don't move the needle. Especially considering your coach doesn't even trust ullmark after the season he had.


Ullmark only one good season? That's simply not true, maybe he's had one great season, but the rest were mostly good.

Smith should probably be switched for Friedman.
24 juin 2023 à 10 h 5
#4
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2023
Messages: 44
Mentions "j'aime": 11
Quoting: GMBL
What about doing DeBrusk for Hanifin instead, and then acquiring Scheifele, Lindholm, or some other C? Bergeron probably retires sooner rather than later. They might as well be ready if they are dealing Lysell.


I'll do one of those later, just messing around with different possibilities.
24 juin 2023 à 10 h 53
#5
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2023
Messages: 44
Mentions "j'aime": 11
Quoting: pensburgh571
In his presser yesterday Dubas specifically said he was going to weaponize cap space . Not give up premium assets to help a heated rival out of cap hell.
Drop the first or drop Smith and maybe you have a deal. Otherwise they aren't giving up two premium assets just to help a rival.
Hall is a shell of his former self and Ullmark has had one really good season. No point in taking on 11 million in cap AND giving up premium assets to a rival for two players that don't move the needle. Especially considering your coach doesn't even trust ullmark after the season he had.


I didn't realize anyone considered Smith a "premium asset", I thought I had seen people trading him for cheap; I'll take him out. Ullmark has been a solid goalie in his career and just had a Vezina Trophy-winning season. Where did you hear that Monty doesn't trust Ullmark? As for Hall, he played on the third line because of the incredible depth the Bruins had this past season. I would bet you big money he puts up more points on a line with Pasta or Marchand. He's a very effective player and was easily one of the Bruins best players in the playoffs. If the Penguins would take Ullmark alone for their '24 1st, I would do that and re-work the Calgary deal. I'd love to keep Hall as our second line winger if they can make the money work. Thanks for your input, it's nice to learn from other fan bases.
24 juin 2023 à 11 h 34
#6
Syd Barret
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2018
Messages: 1,015
Mentions "j'aime": 489
Quoting: CaptainBergeron
I didn't realize anyone considered Smith a "premium asset", I thought I had seen people trading him for cheap; I'll take him out. Ullmark has been a solid goalie in his career and just had a Vezina Trophy-winning season. Where did you hear that Monty doesn't trust Ullmark? As for Hall, he played on the third line because of the incredible depth the Bruins had this past season. I would bet you big money he puts up more points on a line with Pasta or Marchand. He's a very effective player and was easily one of the Bruins best players in the playoffs. If the Penguins would take Ullmark alone for their '24 1st, I would do that and re-work the Calgary deal. I'd love to keep Hall as our second line winger if they can make the money work. Thanks for your input, it's nice to learn from other fan bases.


It may be "sunk cost fallacy" but the penguins gave up a young top-4 dman on a great contract to get smith. And the fact that Dubas said yesterday he wants to focus on using more youth definitely indicates he wants to use Smith and POJ more.
I understand that Ullmark may win the vezina but goalies really don't get a decent return. I mean, MAF won the vezina and that offseaon he was traded for literally nothing lol. And we just watched vegas win the cup with a goalie who was number 5 on their depth chart.
I just don't see the pens and bruins as good trade partners. The bruins (rightfully so) will want to maximize their return and the penguins aren't going to help a very heated rival out of cap hell. Especially with dubas saying he wanted to weaponize cap space
CaptainBergeron a aimé ceci.
24 juin 2023 à 13 h 24
#7
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2023
Messages: 44
Mentions "j'aime": 11
Quoting: pensburgh571
It may be "sunk cost fallacy" but the penguins gave up a young top-4 dman on a great contract to get smith. And the fact that Dubas said yesterday he wants to focus on using more youth definitely indicates he wants to use Smith and POJ more.
I understand that Ullmark may win the vezina but goalies really don't get a decent return. I mean, MAF won the vezina and that offseaon he was traded for literally nothing lol. And we just watched vegas win the cup with a goalie who was number 5 on their depth chart.
I just don't see the pens and bruins as good trade partners. The bruins (rightfully so) will want to maximize their return and the penguins aren't going to help a very heated rival out of cap hell. Especially with dubas saying he wanted to weaponize cap space


Makes a lot of sense, thanks for your thoughts.
24 juin 2023 à 14 h 17
#8
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2023
Messages: 834
Mentions "j'aime": 247
Id rather just get this years 1st from PIT along w like DeSmith or some other unnecessary cap, but ik they wont move that

That is alot to give up to CGY, how about Grz + Freddy + Harrison for Hanafin? or Grz + JD for Hanafin? something like that. Lysell + 1st + 2 roster players + is a lot and CGY has no cap space

I doubt SEA would make that trade 1 for 1, but obv favours BOS
CaptainBergeron a aimé ceci.
24 juin 2023 à 15 h 56
#9
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2023
Messages: 44
Mentions "j'aime": 11
Quoting: princessTom
Id rather just get this years 1st from PIT along w like DeSmith or some other unnecessary cap, but ik they wont move that

That is alot to give up to CGY, how about Grz + Freddy + Harrison for Hanafin? or Grz + JD for Hanafin? something like that. Lysell + 1st + 2 roster players + is a lot and CGY has no cap space

I doubt SEA would make that trade 1 for 1, but obv favours BOS


I would definitely do the Pitt trade w/DeSmith + 1st, but I'm almost certain Dubas wouldn't move this year's first according to his presser.

And the more I think about the Hanafin situation, the more unsure I am. I think Gryz and JD is too much. Maybe Gryz, Frederic, and Harrison, but I bet they'll be offered a 1st and take that deal. Hanafin is a Mass native, went to college in Mass, and the Bruins tried to draft him, so he knows he's wanted. It would be great if he would just sign with us next offseason, but I'm not sure if we'll be lucky enough for that to happen.

Geekie was omitted in some Seattle ACGMs and I've seen them trading for Forbort, so I just combined the two. Definitely don't disagree Boston would be winning that trade.
24 juin 2023 à 22 h 48
#10
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2023
Messages: 834
Mentions "j'aime": 247
Quoting: CaptainBergeron
I would definitely do the Pitt trade w/DeSmith + 1st, but I'm almost certain Dubas wouldn't move this year's first according to his presser.

And the more I think about the Hanafin situation, the more unsure I am. I think Gryz and JD is too much. Maybe Gryz, Frederic, and Harrison, but I bet they'll be offered a 1st and take that deal. Hanafin is a Mass native, went to college in Mass, and the Bruins tried to draft him, so he knows he's wanted. It would be great if he would just sign with us next offseason, but I'm not sure if we'll be lucky enough for that to happen.

Geekie was omitted in some Seattle ACGMs and I've seen them trading for Forbort, so I just combined the two. Definitely don't disagree Boston would be winning that trade.


Grz i view as a replacement (but he is a slight downgrade) so anything you add ontop of him would be to compensate the "downgrade". Both Hanafin and Grz are on last year of deals, the only problem would be outbidding other teams, cuz BOS has limited assets, but he would be such a good fit in Boston

Ill gladly swap Geekie for Forbort, even throw in a 6th or 7th
CaptainBergeron a aimé ceci.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage