SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Danny

Créé par: BroadStreet53
Équipe: 2023-24 Flyers de Philadelphie
Date de création initiale: 20 juin 2023
Publié: 20 juin 2023
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
32 500 000 $
32 000 000 $
33 000 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
11 000 000 $
Transactions
1.
PHI
  1. Choix de 1e ronde en 2024 (COL)
COL
  1. Hayes, Kevin (3 000 000 $ retained)
2.
PHI
  1. Robertson, Nicholas
  2. Choix de 3e ronde en 2024 (NYI)
Rachats de contrats
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Enfoui
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2023
Logo de PHI
Logo de LAK
Logo de FLA
Logo de NYR
Logo de PHI
Logo de EDM
Logo de PHI
Logo de PHI
Logo de OTT
Logo de PHI
2024
Logo de PHI
Logo de FLA
Logo de COL
Logo de CBJ
Logo de LAK
Logo de PHI
Logo de NYI
Logo de PHI
Logo de LAK
Logo de PHI
Logo de PHI
2025
Logo de PHI
Logo de PHI
Logo de PHI
Logo de PHI
Logo de PHI
Logo de PHI
Logo de PHI
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2083 500 000 $68 312 334 $1 187 500 $32 500 $15 187 666 $

Formation

Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Flyers de Philadelphie
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 5
Logo de Flyers de Philadelphie
7 750 000 $7 750 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 7
Logo de Flyers de Philadelphie
5 500 000 $5 500 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Flyers de Philadelphie
5 875 000 $5 875 000 $
AD, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Flyers de Philadelphie
2 500 000 $2 500 000 $
C
RFA - 2
Logo de Flyers de Philadelphie
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
796 667 $796 667 $
AG, AD
RFA - 1
Logo de Flyers de Philadelphie
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
C, AG
RFA - 2
Logo de Flyers de Philadelphie
863 333 $863 333 $
AD
RFA - 2
Logo de Flyers de Philadelphie
1 750 000 $1 750 000 $
AG, AD
M-NTC
UFA - 3
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
C, AD
UFA
Logo de Flyers de Philadelphie
785 000 $785 000 $
AD
RFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Flyers de Philadelphie
6 250 000 $6 250 000 $
DG/DD
NTC
UFA - 8
Logo de Flyers de Philadelphie
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
DG/DD
RFA - 2
Logo de Flyers de Philadelphie
3 979 000 $3 979 000 $
G
RFA - 1
Logo de Flyers de Philadelphie
2 650 000 $2 650 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Flyers de Philadelphie
5 100 000 $5 100 000 $
DD
UFA - 4
Logo de Flyers de Philadelphie
859 167 $859 167 $ (Bonis de performance32 500 $$32K)
G
RFA - 1
Logo de Flyers de Philadelphie
775 000 $775 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Flyers de Philadelphie
1 675 000 $1 675 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Flyers de Philadelphie
6 250 000 $6 250 000 $
DD
UFA - 4

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
20 juin 2023 à 13 h 24
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2021
Messages: 579
Mentions "j'aime": 163
Treliving sais: yes, thank you!
sk540 a aimé ceci.
20 juin 2023 à 13 h 29
#2
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2018
Messages: 1,900
Mentions "j'aime": 593
Way to low for the Flyers to move Laughton, a first needs to be included. I would almost even say it would need to be more than a late 1st and a fledging, oft-injured prospect like Robertson. I would prefer trying to grab Liljegren if he's available.
GMDannyB a aimé ceci.
20 juin 2023 à 13 h 45
#3
Danny B is here
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2023
Messages: 5,063
Mentions "j'aime": 1,969
Quoting: sk540
Way to low for the Flyers to move Laughton, a first needs to be included. I would almost even say it would need to be more than a late 1st and a fledging, oft-injured prospect like Robertson. I would prefer trying to grab Liljegren if he's available.


It’s literally already been reported about Laughton I don’t know how these ACGMs are made with no research lmao
sk540 a aimé ceci.
20 juin 2023 à 13 h 52
#4
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2023
Messages: 522
Mentions "j'aime": 244
Quoting: sk540
Way to low for the Flyers to move Laughton, a first needs to be included. I would almost even say it would need to be more than a late 1st and a fledging, oft-injured prospect like Robertson. I would prefer trying to grab Liljegren if he's available.


Quoting: GMDannyB
It’s literally already been reported about Laughton I don’t know how these ACGMs are made with no research lmao


I’d love to get koneckny for Liligren but not going to happen so 🤷🏻. But neither is Laughton for a 1st, never mind including Liligren. You flyers fans are too much - blogs do not equal reporting; unless / until I hear Tre publicly state that he’s willing to trade our 1st in a historically strong draft (one of only three picks we have this year) for a very capable bottom 6 forward, it’s all made up bs
20 juin 2023 à 14 h 25
#5
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2018
Messages: 1,900
Mentions "j'aime": 593
Quoting: MitchMafia
I’d love to get koneckny for Liligren but not going to happen so 🤷🏻. But neither is Laughton for a 1st, never mind including Liligren. You flyers fans are too much - blogs do not equal reporting; unless / until I hear Tre publicly state that he’s willing to trade our 1st in a historically strong draft (one of only three picks we have this year) for a very capable bottom 6 forward, it’s all made up bs


We're too much?!?!? Says a member of the most unrealistic fanbase in the world. I'm not making up anything, it is well known that we have rejected late round 1sts for Laughton. It came out that Dubas was very close to acquiring him two years ago before Laughton's extension, which was said to be a 1st, which would have been late since you guys have been in the playoffs. The fact that they were offered and then declined, says he is worth at least a 1st. How is that so hard to comprehend. Go look at all your other little Leafs ACGM's, apparently your fans love Laughton, so he's just a bit more than a throw away bottom 6 guy as you put it.
GMDannyB a aimé ceci.
20 juin 2023 à 14 h 48
#6
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2023
Messages: 522
Mentions "j'aime": 244
Quoting: sk540
We're too much?!?!? Says a member of the most unrealistic fanbase in the world. I'm not making up anything, it is well known that we have rejected late round 1sts for Laughton. It came out that Dubas was very close to acquiring him two years ago before Laughton's extension, which was said to be a 1st, which would have been late since you guys have been in the playoffs. The fact that they were offered and then declined, says he is worth at least a 1st. How is that so hard to comprehend. Go look at all your other little Leafs ACGM's, apparently your fans love Laughton, so he's just a bit more than a throw away bottom 6 guy as you put it.


“It is well known…” “Dubas was very close to acquiring him…” how do you make these statements with such confidence? Could be true, could be bs.
Some Leafs fans can be over the top so I guess it’s a bit unfair to jump on flyers fans now, my bad.

But I just don’t see how we can send a 1st for Laughton (he’s valuable but not a difference maker & we can sign FAs - we have cap room) . Different than previous years, we only have three picks this draft and cupboard is looking bare.
BroadStreet53 a aimé ceci.
20 juin 2023 à 15 h 20
#7
Danny B is here
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2023
Messages: 5,063
Mentions "j'aime": 1,969
Quoting: sk540
We're too much?!?!? Says a member of the most unrealistic fanbase in the world. I'm not making up anything, it is well known that we have rejected late round 1sts for Laughton. It came out that Dubas was very close to acquiring him two years ago before Laughton's extension, which was said to be a 1st, which would have been late since you guys have been in the playoffs. The fact that they were offered and then declined, says he is worth at least a 1st. How is that so hard to comprehend. Go look at all your other little Leafs ACGM's, apparently your fans love Laughton, so he's just a bit more than a throw away bottom 6 guy as you put it.


Don’t even bother responding to them, they don’t believe any reporters or insiders so it’s useless.
sk540 a aimé ceci.
20 juin 2023 à 15 h 34
#8
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2018
Messages: 1,900
Mentions "j'aime": 593
Quoting: MitchMafia
“It is well known…” “Dubas was very close to acquiring him…” how do you make these statements with such confidence? Could be true, could be bs.
Some Leafs fans can be over the top so I guess it’s a bit unfair to jump on flyers fans now, my bad.

But I just don’t see how we can send a 1st for Laughton (he’s valuable but not a difference maker & we can sign FAs - we have cap room) . Different than previous years, we only have three picks this draft and cupboard is looking bare.


How do you think insiders throw out that Provorov may be on the move, and then 3 hours later he's traded? Inside sources give out this stuff, especially after the fact when it doesn't matter anymore. I agree that there's a lot of smoke out there, but if you're analytic and don't believe everything you read, you can read between the lines about what stuff happened and what didn't.
20 juin 2023 à 16 h 0
#9
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2023
Messages: 522
Mentions "j'aime": 244
Quoting: sk540
How do you think insiders throw out that Provorov may be on the move, and then 3 hours later he's traded? Inside sources give out this stuff, especially after the fact when it doesn't matter anymore. I agree that there's a lot of smoke out there, but if you're analytic and don't believe everything you read, you can read between the lines about what stuff happened and what didn't.

Flyers fire their GM, rebuild on the way…not hard to guess guys that could moved. I didn’t see anyone accurately predicting what the return would be, because it would have total guess work. Same with Laughton - he’s likely to be moved but just no way I believe Leafs offered (& were rejected) a 1st. Bloggers are totally guessing on teams and offers
BroadStreet53 a aimé ceci.
20 juin 2023 à 16 h 41
#10
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2018
Messages: 114
Mentions "j'aime": 34
Quoting: sk540
We're too much?!?!? Says a member of the most unrealistic fanbase in the world. I'm not making up anything, it is well known that we have rejected late round 1sts for Laughton. It came out that Dubas was very close to acquiring him two years ago before Laughton's extension, which was said to be a 1st, which would have been late since you guys have been in the playoffs. The fact that they were offered and then declined, says he is worth at least a 1st. How is that so hard to comprehend. Go look at all your other little Leafs ACGM's, apparently your fans love Laughton, so he's just a bit more than a throw away bottom 6 guy as you put it.


He is a very solid bottom 6 who can slot in anywhere in your lineup in a pinch. I do not see him worth a 1st. He is a nice veteran, but if you can acquire a 1st no questions asked he has to go. This is a rebuild not the b.s. with we need good veterans to show the rookies the ropes. Show them what? We need talent and to get that you need assets in a rebuild. Our best player of the last 20 years got us Tippett and a 1st. All these GMs think Scott Laughton will fetch us a 1st and.......Not a shot in hell. He is desireable because he has term on a reasonable cap hit. He is a nice depth player, but nothing more. You dont win cups because of Scott Laughton. He can be a nice piece on a cup winning team however.
MitchMafia et sk540 a aimé ceci.
20 juin 2023 à 16 h 58
#11
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2023
Messages: 522
Mentions "j'aime": 244
Quoting: BroadStreet53
He is a very solid bottom 6 who can slot in anywhere in your lineup in a pinch. I do not see him worth a 1st. He is a nice veteran, but if you can acquire a 1st no questions asked he has to go. This is a rebuild not the b.s. with we need good veterans to show the rookies the ropes. Show them what? We need talent and to get that you need assets in a rebuild. Our best player of the last 20 years got us Tippett and a 1st. All these GMs think Scott Laughton will fetch us a 1st and.......Not a shot in hell. He is desireable because he has term on a reasonable cap hit. He is a nice depth player, but nothing more. You dont win cups because of Scott Laughton. He can be a nice piece on a cup winning team however.


Not a flyer fan (go Leafs go) but unquestionably the league is better when Philly is in the mix - should be some of the hardest away games of the year . Hopefully won’t take too long - I read you have a strong prospect pool and if Danny navigates this off season well, should get a lot better
sk540 a aimé ceci.
20 juin 2023 à 17 h 6
#12
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2018
Messages: 1,900
Mentions "j'aime": 593
Quoting: BroadStreet53
He is a very solid bottom 6 who can slot in anywhere in your lineup in a pinch. I do not see him worth a 1st. He is a nice veteran, but if you can acquire a 1st no questions asked he has to go. This is a rebuild not the b.s. with we need good veterans to show the rookies the ropes. Show them what? We need talent and to get that you need assets in a rebuild. Our best player of the last 20 years got us Tippett and a 1st. All these GMs think Scott Laughton will fetch us a 1st and.......Not a shot in hell. He is desireable because he has term on a reasonable cap hit. He is a nice depth player, but nothing more. You dont win cups because of Scott Laughton. He can be a nice piece on a cup winning team however.


I didn't say anything against any one of your points, I am taking what I've heard from hockey insiders, not bloggers or vlogs or twitter followers with 8 followers. People/accounts that are in the know, that break deals prior to them happening, to have a pulse on said team.

I didn't say what I think Laughton is worth, i reiterated what other people have seen and heard what he is worth. Personally, I wouldn't trade a first for a guy like Laughton either, even though I love how he plays and what he brings to a lineup. He's like a lesser Barbashev, like a 3rd line guy the Lightning seem to produce or acquire year after year. He can score a bit, mix it up a bit, plays a defensive responsible game, has a good motor, leads by example, and is a good role model. Again, if im a GM, I wouldn't trade a first for that. But it appears real life GMs would, that's all i'm saying. He certainly could be a nice piece to a cup winning team and I think he will be eventually. Unfortunately, probably not with the Flyers. By the time we're ready to compete he will be on the wrong side of 30, so again, I agree with getting as much as you can for him. Whatever that is, who knows till it happens.
20 juin 2023 à 17 h 6
#13
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2018
Messages: 1,900
Mentions "j'aime": 593
Quoting: MitchMafia
Not a flyer fan (go Leafs go) but unquestionably the league is better when Philly is in the mix - should be some of the hardest away games of the year . Hopefully won’t take too long - I read you have a strong prospect pool and if Danny navigates this off season well, should get a lot better


I can agree with you on that at least
MitchMafia a aimé ceci.
20 juin 2023 à 19 h 26
#14
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2017
Messages: 9,663
Mentions "j'aime": 4,606
Avs accept if there are no better options available.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage