Brutal value on that Toronto trade. Wilson has been injured and somewhat declining, Nylander is in his prime. Liljegren is also a pretty large piece of Toronto's future. If you break down the trade, it's Wilson and a second for Nylander, then Milano and a third for Liljegren. Both are heavily lopsided.

Wilson isn't moving.

CHI might consider that.

While he has been injured, he was on pace for one of his highest goal totals after he cam back from the injury. He might be on the down swing sometime, but it definitely isn't now.

The injury in general shows me that he is declining. Sure, it was impressive to see him have a solid season coming back from that injury. I still wouldn't trade Nylander for him.

Injuries meaning decline is a weird take, would you say that guys like Slafkovsky and Caufield are on the decline?

Are Slafkovsky and Caufield almost 30?

But you didn't mention his age before, just that his injury meant you thought he was declining. Plus late 20-early 30s are the primes of most NHL players

I apologize for not mentioning their age, I thought that was just a given when I said the word "declining". I feel like in today's NHL, most primes are 25-28 range.