SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Hard Forechecking

Créé par: GhostGM92
Équipe: 2023-24 Red Wings de Detroit
Date de création initiale: 22 mai 2023
Publié: 22 mai 2023
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
83 000 000 $
54 000 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
12 000 000 $
22 800 000 $
23 800 000 $
35 000 000 $
73 800 000 $
Offres hostiles
Le salaire annuel moyen (AAV) de l'offre hostile est calculé en divisant la valeur totale du contrat par: 1. La durée totale du contrat, ou 2. Cinq ans
JOUEURAAVCOMPENSATION
McLeod, Michael4 000 000 $
Choix de 2e ronde en 2024
Transactions
1.
2.
DET
  1. Choix de 3e ronde en 2023 (NJD)
3.
4.
5.
Rachats de contrats
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2023
Logo de DET
Logo de NYI
Logo de DET
Logo de STL
Logo de VAN
Logo de DET
Logo de NJD
Logo de MIN
Logo de DET
Logo de DET
Logo de DET
2024
Logo de DET
Logo de BOS
Logo de DET
Logo de DET
Logo de DAL
Logo de DET
Logo de DET
Logo de DET
2025
Logo de DET
Logo de DET
Logo de DET
Logo de DET
Logo de BOS
Logo de DET
Logo de DET
Logo de DET
Logo de STL
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2183 500 000 $76 121 389 $0 $1 840 000 $7 378 611 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Predators de Nashville
1 700 000 $1 700 000 $
AG, C
UFA - 1
Logo de Red Wings de Detroit
8 700 000 $8 700 000 $
C
NTC
UFA - 8
Logo de Flames de Calgary
4 900 000 $4 900 000 $
AD, AG
NTC
UFA - 4
Logo de Red Wings de Detroit
1 460 000 $1 460 000 $
AG, C
UFA - 1
Logo de Red Wings de Detroit
5 625 000 $5 625 000 $
C, AG, AD
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
3 100 000 $3 100 000 $
AD, AG
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo de Red Wings de Detroit
878 333 $878 333 $ (Bonis de performance57 500 $$58K)
AG, C
RFA - 2
4 000 000 $4 000 000 $
C
RFA - 1
2 800 000 $2 800 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 3
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Red Wings de Detroit
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
C
RFA - 1
Logo de Coyotes de l'Arizona
3 200 000 $3 200 000 $
AD
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Red Wings de Detroit
3 400 000 $3 400 000 $
DG
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Red Wings de Detroit
863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
DD
RFA - 1
Logo de Red Wings de Detroit
4 750 000 $4 750 000 $
G
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Red Wings de Detroit
4 750 000 $4 750 000 $
DG/DD
M-NTC
UFA - 3
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
DD
UFA - 3
3 800 000 $3 800 000 $
G
UFA - 5
Logo de Red Wings de Detroit
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
DG
UFA - 2
3 800 000 $3 800 000 $
DD
UFA - 3
Logo de Red Wings de Detroit
820 000 $820 000 $ (Bonis de performance82 500 $$82K)
DG
RFA - 1
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Red Wings de Detroit
894 167 $894 167 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
DG
RFA - 3

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
22 mai 2023 à 5 h 10
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 38,705
Mentions "j'aime": 19,796
Coleman almost certainly declines but Calgary will offer #13 and Vladar for Raymond
22 mai 2023 à 5 h 11
#2
Démarrer sujet
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2023
Messages: 1,451
Mentions "j'aime": 114
Quoting: Ledge_And_Dairy
Coleman almost certainly declines but Calgary will offer #13 and Vladar for Raymond


Maybe
22 mai 2023 à 5 h 15
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 38,705
Mentions "j'aime": 19,796
@aedoran do you think Raymond could be available and if so what would you want?
22 mai 2023 à 6 h 17
#4
Pop Pop
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2018
Messages: 14,674
Mentions "j'aime": 8,301
This is brutal
futurebobmckenzie a aimé ceci.
22 mai 2023 à 6 h 20
#5
Démarrer sujet
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2023
Messages: 1,451
Mentions "j'aime": 114
Quoting: Jfstompers
This is brutal


Disagree completely
22 mai 2023 à 6 h 33
#6
Démarrer sujet
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2023
Messages: 1,451
Mentions "j'aime": 114
Quoting: Jfstompers
This is brutal


This team is much more physical and harder to play against. I think they will generate way more offense five on five because of the turnovers we will create on the forecheck. Defensively we won't get pushed around and will knock players off the puck. The Red Wings aren't a good team as is anyways but are soft on top of it. They won games by having a good PK and good goaltending by Husso. They were also defensively structured. But they were one of the softest teams in the league. So the changes I made got rid of soft players that are liabilities defensively. And again this team will actually create more offense because of a great forecheck. And we will score more dirty goals and be a good cycling team being good on the boards. I also got a good tandem goalie. I think this team is designed for the playoffs.
22 mai 2023 à 6 h 50
#7
Démarrer sujet
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2023
Messages: 1,451
Mentions "j'aime": 114
Quoting: NHLLGRW
This team is much more physical and harder to play against. I think they will generate way more offense five on five because of the turnovers we will create on the forecheck. Defensively we won't get pushed around and will knock players off the puck. The Red Wings aren't a good team as is anyways but are soft on top of it. They won games by having a good PK and good goaltending by Husso. They were also defensively structured. But they were one of the softest teams in the league. So the changes I made got rid of soft players that are liabilities defensively. And again this team will actually create more offense because of a great forecheck. And we will score more dirty goals and be a good cycling team being good on the boards. I also got a good tandem goalie. I think this team is designed for the playoffs.


Also last year the Red Wings were never the same team when Rasmussen got hurt and was out of the lineup. Yakov Trenin gives you another player like that but even better in my opinion. I think he's extremely underrated as he has size and plays a physical game but also has great hands and scoring ability. Foligno brings another big body that finishes his checks and plays with an edge. Blake Coleman is a way better all around hockey player than Lucas Raymond so that's a win.
22 mai 2023 à 7 h 31
#8
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2022
Messages: 2,719
Mentions "j'aime": 2,366
As long as you had fun I guess that’s the point of the website. Definitely the opposite direction the Wings will go, but to each their own.
AmeriCanadian a aimé ceci.
22 mai 2023 à 7 h 54
#9
Pop Pop
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2018
Messages: 14,674
Mentions "j'aime": 8,301
Quoting: NHLLGRW
This team is much more physical and harder to play against. I think they will generate way more offense five on five because of the turnovers we will create on the forecheck. Defensively we won't get pushed around and will knock players off the puck. The Red Wings aren't a good team as is anyways but are soft on top of it. They won games by having a good PK and good goaltending by Husso. They were also defensively structured. But they were one of the softest teams in the league. So the changes I made got rid of soft players that are liabilities defensively. And again this team will actually create more offense because of a great forecheck. And we will score more dirty goals and be a good cycling team being good on the boards. I also got a good tandem goalie. I think this team is designed for the playoffs.


They won't get to the playoffs, they won't generate any offense.
22 mai 2023 à 7 h 57
#10
Démarrer sujet
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2023
Messages: 1,451
Mentions "j'aime": 114
Quoting: Jfstompers
They won't get to the playoffs, they won't generate any offense


Hmmm maybe I could use the 7 million to sign someone like Tarasenko or trade for someone.
22 mai 2023 à 7 h 59
#11
Pop Pop
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2018
Messages: 14,674
Mentions "j'aime": 8,301
Quoting: NHLLGRW
Hmmm maybe I could use the 7 million to sign someone like Tarasenko or trade for someone.


Don't trade the young guys who are growing, Raymond for Coleman, that's bananas, Berggren for trenin it makes no sense.
AmeriCanadian a aimé ceci.
22 mai 2023 à 8 h 1
#12
Démarrer sujet
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2023
Messages: 1,451
Mentions "j'aime": 114
Quoting: Jfstompers
Don't trade the young guys who are growing, Raymond for Coleman, that's bananas, Berggren for trenin it makes no sense.


It's going to take five years for Raymond
22 mai 2023 à 8 h 43
#13
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2020
Messages: 753
Mentions "j'aime": 582
Quoting: NHLLGRW
It's going to take five years for Raymond


He's already got a 57 point season... and even in a struggle filled sophomore year he still put up over 40 points

Trading him for anything less than an absolute stud player is such a terrible idea.

You say this team will generate offense, but from where? Raymond, Kubalik, Berggren, and Perron were 4 of the 5 guys who could score a goal last season. You're basically setting the team to "here's a million guys who can get the puck" which is all well and good. But none of them can score worth a damn other than Larkin on this roster

None of these trades are worthwhile, we would be fighting for a top 5 pick next year rather than a playoff spot with this roster.
22 mai 2023 à 8 h 54
#14
Démarrer sujet
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2023
Messages: 1,451
Mentions "j'aime": 114
Quoting: AmeriCanadian
He's already got a 57 point season... and even in a struggle filled sophomore year he still put up over 40 points

Trading him for anything less than an absolute stud player is such a terrible idea.

You say this team will generate offense, but from where? Raymond, Kubalik, Berggren, and Perron were 4 of the 5 guys who could score a goal last season. You're basically setting the team to "here's a million guys who can get the puck" which is all well and good. But none of them can score worth a damn other than Larkin on this roster

None of these trades are worthwhile, we would be fighting for a top 5 pick next year rather than a playoff spot with this roster.


Lucas Raymond is awful, he just is and Coleman would get that many points playing with Larkin and probably more and he's not soft. Yakov Trenin could easily put up 20 goals playing in the top six and when given more ice time. None of those players you mentioned are that good and are all soft players. Perron is old and can't skate.
22 mai 2023 à 9 h 29
#15
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2023
Messages: 745
Mentions "j'aime": 136
Minnesota declines. Both the gm and coach aren't found of one trick pennies like Dominik whose not a two way player
GhostGM92 a aimé ceci.
22 mai 2023 à 10 h 50
#16
Pop Pop
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2018
Messages: 14,674
Mentions "j'aime": 8,301
Quoting: NHLLGRW
It's going to take five years for Raymond


5 years to what score 30 pts season like Coleman, he's already more productive and if you're moving him it's not for a checking middle 6 winget
AmeriCanadian a aimé ceci.
22 mai 2023 à 11 h 39
#17
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2020
Messages: 753
Mentions "j'aime": 582
Quoting: NHLLGRW
Lucas Raymond is awful, he just is and Coleman would get that many points playing with Larkin and probably more and he's not soft. Yakov Trenin could easily put up 20 goals playing in the top six and when given more ice time. None of those players you mentioned are that good and are all soft players. Perron is old and can't skate.


Alright so now I'm sure you're trolling, keep having fun then smile
22 mai 2023 à 12 h 48
#18
Démarrer sujet
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2023
Messages: 1,451
Mentions "j'aime": 114
Quoting: AmeriCanadian
Alright so now I'm sure you're trolling, keep having fun then smile


Not trolling just trading a player I don't like and bringing in one I do. It's really that simple. Stop calling people trolls because you disagree with them on a player. Lucas Raymond had two goal that last thirty games and is a soft player. Blake Coleman isn't soft and plays a much better all around game. Lucas Raymond plays with Larkin and should have been sent down to the AHL he was so bad. That's a fact.
22 mai 2023 à 12 h 51
#19
Démarrer sujet
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2023
Messages: 1,451
Mentions "j'aime": 114
Quoting: Jfstompers
5 years to what score 30 pts season like Coleman, he's already more productive and if you're moving him it's not for a checking middle 6 winget


It's not just about putting up points. Lucas Raymond is the softest player in the league and is a defensive liability. Anyone who thinks Lucas Raymond is actually a better all around player than Blake Coleman is dreaming. Lucas Raymond is bad for the Red Wings.
22 mai 2023 à 15 h 21
#20
Wing nut
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2022
Messages: 57
Mentions "j'aime": 30
Glad you're having fun. The ONLY part i like is the gudas signing. Would prefer to offer a little bit less money for him. If you are to get rid of Raymond, wouldn't you go for someone who is an all around player that is good? Some elite talent. Coleman is the last piece type of player you add at the deadline when you are looking to contend. We are at least 5 years from that.
22 mai 2023 à 15 h 43
#21
Démarrer sujet
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2023
Messages: 1,451
Mentions "j'aime": 114
Quoting: Adirn22
Glad you're having fun. The ONLY part i like is the gudas signing. Would prefer to offer a little bit less money for him. If you are to get rid of Raymond, wouldn't you go for someone who is an all around player that is good? Some elite talent. Coleman is the last piece type of player you add at the deadline when you are looking to contend. We are at least 5 years from that.


I like Coleman but I've used Raymond in other trade packages that are probably better.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage