SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Who is the best center that Marino plus Holtz could buy

Créé par: NHLfan10506
Équipe: 2023-24 Devils du New Jersey
Date de création initiale: 14 mai 2023
Publié: 14 mai 2023
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
If we sought to add a top 3C, who is the best a Marino + Holtz package could buy?

JEE is serving as example here.

Goal would be to be able to run three lines. Right now, teams that play match-ups well are best at neutralizing Hughes and Hischier. A perfect fit would be a two-way center that fits our high-pace style of play. Cap and age factors as well. This all assumes we extend Severson and Nemec is on track for 2024-25 arrival.
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
78 375 000 $
36 950 000 $
12 050 000 $
41 750 000 $
31 250 000 $
31 250 000 $
1775 000 $
1775 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
32 650 000 $
66 150 000 $
11 250 000 $
11 200 000 $
Transactions
Rachats de contrats
Frais appliqués
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2023
Logo de NJD
Logo de NJD
Logo de NJD
Logo de NJD
Logo de NJD
2024
Logo de NJD
Logo de NJD
Logo de NJD
Logo de COL
Logo de NJD
2025
Logo de NJD
Logo de NJD
Logo de NJD
Logo de NJD
Logo de NJD
Logo de NJD
Logo de NJD
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2383 500 000 $83 492 500 $422 500 $1 382 500 $7 500 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Devils du New Jersey
8 375 000 $8 375 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 8
Logo de Devils du New Jersey
7 250 000 $7 250 000 $
C
UFA - 4
Logo de Devils du New Jersey
6 950 000 $6 950 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 8
Logo de Devils du New Jersey
2 050 000 $2 050 000 $
C, AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Devils du New Jersey
8 000 000 $8 000 000 $
C
UFA - 7
Logo de Devils du New Jersey
894 167 $894 167 $ (Bonis de performance400 000 $$400K)
AD, C
RFA - 1
Logo de Devils du New Jersey
2 650 000 $2 650 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 3
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
5 250 000 $5 250 000 $
C
UFA - 6
Logo de Devils du New Jersey
6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
AG, AD
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo de Devils du New Jersey
1 250 000 $1 250 000 $
AG
UFA - 6
Logo de Devils du New Jersey
1 750 000 $1 750 000 $
C
RFA - 1
Logo de Devils du New Jersey
1 250 000 $1 250 000 $
AD
UFA - 2
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Devils du New Jersey
3 400 000 $3 400 000 $
DG
UFA - 5
Logo de Devils du New Jersey
9 000 000 $9 000 000 $
DD
NMC
UFA - 5
Logo de Devils du New Jersey
850 833 $850 833 $ (Bonis de performance57 500 $$58K)
G
RFA - 1
Logo de Devils du New Jersey
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance925 000 $$925K)
DG/DD
RFA - 2
Logo de Devils du New Jersey
6 150 000 $6 150 000 $
DD
UFA - 8
Logo de Devils du New Jersey
3 400 000 $3 400 000 $
G
UFA - 2
Logo de Devils du New Jersey
1 250 000 $1 250 000 $
DG
RFA - 2
1 200 000 $1 200 000 $
DD
UFA - 3
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Devils du New Jersey
775 000 $775 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Devils du New Jersey
1 100 000 $1 100 000 $
DG/DD, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Devils du New Jersey
775 000 $775 000 $
C, AG
RFA - 1
Équipe de réserve
Logo de Devils du New Jersey
918 333 $918 333 $ (0 $$00 $$0) (Bonis de performance3 250 000 $$3M)
DD
RFA - 3
Logo de Devils du New Jersey
925 000 $925 000 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
AG, AD
RFA - 1
Logo de Devils du New Jersey
863 333 $863 333 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
AG
RFA - 1
Logo de Devils du New Jersey
850 833 $850 833 $ (0 $$00 $$0) (Bonis de performance57 500 $$58K)
AD, C
RFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
15 mai 2023 à 0 h 24
#26
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2023
Messages: 745
Mentions "j'aime": 136
With all due respect, Minnesota isn't trading one of the best shutdown d and rising C in the league just signed to 8 years extension for a d they have no need for and winger prospect.
15 mai 2023 à 0 h 24
#27
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2023
Messages: 745
Mentions "j'aime": 136
Quoting: capsfan2121
Why would you need to make a trade for a 3c


Haula is right there. And keep holtz


He's not a 3c. If you watch Minnesota at all last year, he quickly became Minnesota 1c / 2c
capsfan2121 a aimé ceci.
15 mai 2023 à 0 h 25
#28
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2023
Messages: 745
Mentions "j'aime": 136
Quoting: Bdawwwgy1
Do you really need a 3C that bad? If so, I think that’s a fine package for JEEK but I don’t think Minny does it because they are so barren at C.


Maybe Cirelli?


It's not a good package. Doesn't address Minnesota need, none
15 mai 2023 à 0 h 28
#29
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2023
Messages: 745
Mentions "j'aime": 136
Quoting: NHLfan10506
JEE would be 3rd center. I don’t think I am underrating him here as I offered a fairly solid package for him.

My think is this…

Teams are adapting to Hughes and playing their best defensive units against him. Hischier is often deployed in defensive situations or to counter opponents top lines. So there are a bunch of situations where our third line could end up with favorable match-up, but our 3rd line wasn’t good enough to fully capitalize on a mismatch. In the Carolina series, it feel to our fourth line (Wood, Bastian, McLeod) who looked better offensively than they had in a while. If we had a legit 3rd line that could play similarly style as Hughes and Hischier lines , we may have been able to do more in those minutes that made McLeod look like an offensive stud.

Make sense?


Can I just say with all due respect, you didn't? Minnesota doesn't need a d as their prospects pool is stacked with one. Then you offered a winger/ winger prospect when Minnesota just spent the last two 1st round picks on one. C , especially one like Eriksson ek signed to 8 years extension are expensive and don't get traded
15 mai 2023 à 6 h 55
#30
CbjSabresDucks
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2020
Messages: 4,724
Mentions "j'aime": 2,180
Quoting: Mjoyce001
It's not a good package. Doesn't address Minnesota need, none


That’s literally what I said lol, doesn’t fit what minny needs.


HOWEVER, In a world where you trade JEEK for whatever reason, this would be a good package
15 mai 2023 à 8 h 49
#31
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2023
Messages: 745
Mentions "j'aime": 136
Quoting: Bdawwwgy1
That’s literally what I said lol, doesn’t fit what minny needs.


HOWEVER, In a world where you trade JEEK for whatever reason, this would be a good package


This in no way wouldn't. MIN has no need on d or winger for the longest time.
15 mai 2023 à 8 h 55
#32
CbjSabresDucks
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2020
Messages: 4,724
Mentions "j'aime": 2,180
Quoting: Mjoyce001
This in no way wouldn't. MIN has no need on d or winger for the longest time.


this is what im saying. in a vacuum the package is fine but isnt what Minny needs
15 mai 2023 à 10 h 31
#33
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2019
Messages: 40,833
Mentions "j'aime": 18,590
Quoting: Mjoyce001
It's not a good package. Doesn't address Minnesota need, none


It doesn't address their needs, but is worthwhile package

Quoting: Bdawwwgy1
That’s literally what I said lol, doesn’t fit what minny needs.
HOWEVER, In a world where you trade JEEK for whatever reason, this would be a good package


It is worthwhile package but doesn't address their needs.

Quoting: Mjoyce001
This in no way wouldn't. MIN has no need on d or winger for the longest time.


It doesn't address their needs, but is worthwhile package

Quoting: Bdawwwgy1
this is what im saying. in a vacuum the package is fine but isnt what Minny needs


It is worthwhile package but doesn't address their needs.
15 mai 2023 à 10 h 45
#34
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2023
Messages: 745
Mentions "j'aime": 136
Quoting: NHLfan10506
It doesn't address their needs, but is worthwhile package



It is worthwhile package but doesn't address their needs.



It doesn't address their needs, but is worthwhile package



It is worthwhile package but doesn't address their needs.


C'S ARE always cost more especially young two way C like Eriksson ek. You didn't even put a 1st or give up any good pieces. He's not a 3c respectfully. Any C will always cost.
15 mai 2023 à 12 h 23
#35
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2019
Messages: 40,833
Mentions "j'aime": 18,590
Quoting: Mjoyce001
C'S ARE always cost more especially young two way C like Eriksson ek. You didn't even put a 1st or give up any good pieces. He's not a 3c respectfully. Any C will always cost.


Um...a top-4 dman and a top-10 prospect are very good pieces. I would happily replace either with any pick we own.
15 mai 2023 à 14 h 16
#36
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2023
Messages: 745
Mentions "j'aime": 136
Quoting: NHLfan10506
Um...a top-4 dman and a top-10 prospect are very good pieces. I would happily replace either with any pick we own.


And like you said you should have put Eriksson ek because you didn't offer anything to Minnesota that they need besides him not being available
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage