SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Next Year

Créé par: Tomas_Hurdle
Équipe: 2023-24 Sharks de San Jose
Date de création initiale: 5 mai 2023
Publié: 5 mai 2023
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
34 500 000 $
2816 667 $
1775 000 $
2850 000 $
1785 000 $
2800 000 $
11 750 000 $
Transactions
1.
SJS
  1. Bouchard, Evan [Droits de RFA]
  2. Campbell, Jack
  3. Holloway, Dylan
  4. Rodrigue, Olivier [Droits de RFA]
  5. Tullio, Tyler
  6. Yamamoto, Kailer
  7. Choix de 1e ronde en 2024 (EDM)
Détails additionnels:
2026 2nd round pick (EDM)
EDM
  1. Gregor, Noah [Droits de RFA]
  2. Karlsson, Erik (2 400 000 $ retained)
  3. Mann, Strauss [Droits de RFA]
  4. Choix de 6e ronde en 2025 (SJS)
2.
SJS
  1. Salo, Robin
  2. Choix de 2e ronde en 2024 (NYI)
Rachats de contrats
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2023
Logo de SJS
Logo de NJD
Logo de SJS
Logo de CAR
Logo de SJS
Logo de SEA
Logo de SJS
Logo de CBJ
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de PIT
Logo de VAN
2024
Logo de SJS
Logo de EDM
Logo de SJS
Logo de NJD
Logo de NYI
Logo de VGK
Logo de PIT
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de NJD
2025
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de WPG
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2383 500 000 $67 189 168 $25 000 $1 712 500 $16 310 832 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
AG
RFA - 3
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
6 750 000 $6 750 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 7
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
2 500 000 $2 500 000 $
AD, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
785 000 $785 000 $
AG, C
RFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
8 000 000 $8 000 000 $
C
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
2 750 000 $2 750 000 $
AD, C
RFA - 1
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance650 000 $$650K)
AG, C
RFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
916 667 $916 667 $
C, AG
RFA - 1
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
AD
RFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
1 050 000 $1 050 000 $
C, AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
C
UFA - 2
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
1 750 000 $1 750 000 $
AD
RFA - 2
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
7 000 000 $7 000 000 $
DG/DD
M-NTC
UFA - 3
4 500 000 $4 500 000 $
DD
RFA - 2
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
G
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
912 500 $912 500 $ (Bonis de performance212 500 $$212K)
DG
RFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
1 250 000 $1 250 000 $
DD
UFA - 3
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
2 750 000 $2 750 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Islanders de New York
800 000 $800 000 $
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
1 250 000 $1 250 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 2
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
2 500 000 $2 500 000 $
AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
816 667 $816 667 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
2 250 000 $2 250 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
5 mai 2023 à 5 h 36
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2020
Messages: 4,901
Mentions "j'aime": 1,406
Isles aren’t interested in either piece
Nightowl26 a aimé ceci.
5 mai 2023 à 6 h 54
#2
Gronk9797
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2023
Messages: 221
Mentions "j'aime": 75
I mean, why don’t the Oilers through in Hyman as well, would you also like 2-3 more draft picks?

Oilers hung up the phone at 2.4M retained.

The ship has sailed, Bouchard wasn’t available then, he certainly isn’t now, your GM botched the trade.
CD282 a aimé ceci.
5 mai 2023 à 7 h 26
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2022
Messages: 184
Mentions "j'aime": 72
Quoting: Gronk9911
I mean, why don’t the Oilers through in Hyman as well, would you also like 2-3 more draft picks?

Oilers hung up the phone at 2.4M retained.

The ship has sailed, Bouchard wasn’t available then, he certainly isn’t now, your GM botched the trade.

How did he botch the trade? By not giving you Karlsson for cheap?
5 mai 2023 à 8 h 5
#4
Gronk9797
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2023
Messages: 221
Mentions "j'aime": 75
Quoting: pavelski_tip_in
How did he botch the trade? By not giving you Karlsson for cheap?


No, the rumour was Yamamoto, Barrie, Broberg, Holloway and a 1st, . With 40% retained.

Like I said, GM botched the trade.
5 mai 2023 à 8 h 6
#5
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2018
Messages: 755
Mentions "j'aime": 291
Quoting: Islesforthecup
Isles aren’t interested in either piece


I think Ferraro would be an OK addition if they're comfortable with one of him or Aho playing their off side (assuming Mayfield leaves).

Labanc they can keep though.
5 mai 2023 à 8 h 22
#6
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2017
Messages: 24,162
Mentions "j'aime": 7,791
Edmonton declines. They spent their money on Ekholm, which was the better fit anyhow. He's much better defensively while being underrated offensively.

And if you think the Oilers are giving up Bouchard in ANY trade you haven't been paying attention.
Gronk9911 a aimé ceci.
5 mai 2023 à 12 h 49
#7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2022
Messages: 184
Mentions "j'aime": 72
Quoting: Gronk9911
No, the rumour was Yamamoto, Barrie, Broberg, Holloway and a 1st, . With 40% retained.

Like I said, GM botched the trade.

Choosing not to retain $18.4M for that return is not botching the trade.
5 mai 2023 à 13 h 47
#8
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2020
Messages: 1,641
Mentions "j'aime": 532
Quoting: Gronk9911
No, the rumour was Yamamoto, Barrie, Broberg, Holloway and a 1st, . With 40% retained.

Like I said, GM botched the trade.


Where did that rumor come from? According to Stauffer the offer was 1st, Bouchard, Bourgault, two contracts (Barrie + someone else).

40-50% retention can easily be considered a dodge and not a botch based on the return. There wasn't enough being offered to retain that much... to pay another team to have your star player.

Also there wasn't enough time to work out something with a third team. The Meier trade seemed to eat up all their time.
pavelski_tip_in a aimé ceci.
5 mai 2023 à 18 h 30
#9
Gronk9797
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2023
Messages: 221
Mentions "j'aime": 75
Quoting: pavelski_tip_in
Choosing not to retain $18.4M for that return is not botching the trade.


Yep, for a what 36-37 year old RHD when his term is done.
5 mai 2023 à 18 h 34
#10
Gronk9797
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2023
Messages: 221
Mentions "j'aime": 75
Quoting: poeticentropy
Where did that rumor come from? According to Stauffer the offer was 1st, Bouchard, Bourgault, two contracts (Barrie + someone else).

40-50% retention can easily be considered a dodge and not a botch based on the return. There wasn't enough being offered to retain that much... to pay another team to have your star player.

Also there wasn't enough time to work out something with a third team. The Meier trade seemed to eat up all their time.



Oilers TV the trade deadline episode they reference an ask for Bouchard but he wasn’t the “prospect” they were talking about which inferred more Broberg than Bouchard.
Sounds like Bouchard was never in the conversation of any trade and could very well be the reason the deal did fall apart.
Like I said, the GM botched it by asking for far more than a 32 year old defencmen should get.
6 mai 2023 à 16 h 3
#11
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2020
Messages: 1,641
Mentions "j'aime": 532
Quoting: Gronk9911
Oilers TV the trade deadline episode they reference an ask for Bouchard but he wasn’t the “prospect” they were talking about which inferred more Broberg than Bouchard.
Sounds like Bouchard was never in the conversation of any trade and could very well be the reason the deal did fall apart.
Like I said, the GM botched it by asking for far more than a 32 year old defencmen should get.


You're obsessed with age.
6th defenseman to get 100 pts since leech in 90s and Pavs scoring 4 goals in one playoff game at 38years old. There's exceptions
6 mai 2023 à 21 h 22
#12
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2020
Messages: 4,901
Mentions "j'aime": 1,406
Quoting: tm0000
I think Ferraro would be an OK addition if they're comfortable with one of him or Aho playing their off side (assuming Mayfield leaves).

Labanc they can keep though.


They already have Pelech Romanov Pulock and Dobson as well as Aho and Bolduc they aren’t paying 3.75 for a guy to play 3rd pair
7 mai 2023 à 6 h 47
#13
Gronk9797
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2023
Messages: 221
Mentions "j'aime": 75
Quoting: poeticentropy
You're obsessed with age.
6th defenseman to get 100 pts since leech in 90s and Pavs scoring 4 goals in one playoff game at 38years old. There's exceptions


Karlsson can fall off a cliff tomorrow and the term is a risk, is he good? Yes, is he worth 5 players. Ekholm say’s he’ll no.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage