Kampf Supremacy
Rejoint: nov. 2021
Messages: 158
Mentions "j'aime": 40
IF ek was 50% retained, the 2nd was lowered, and Sprong was out for like a 3rd, Seattle might consider it, but this is a high risk move, especially for a team that is built on low risk moves/signings. Seattle should avoid star players that aren't home grown, which would include trades for 32 yr old guy who only had 1 (incredibly) good season in the past 4 years and costs 5.75 mil, im kinda convincing myself to approve the trade but I'm gonna stand my ground and say no and that its too risky. The main problem is the duration of the contract, you'd be taking away money you'll need to resign most of the important players on the team in the next 2 years, which adds to the risk of the move, and even though Evans will not be as good as ek, I'd still rather leave a power play spot for him in the future.