SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

If Chuck Fletcher were as smart as me...

Créé par: MNBassman
Équipe: 2017-18 Wild du Minnesota
Date de création initiale: 17 juin 2017
Publié: 17 juin 2017
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
Because of the NMCs GM Chuck Fletcher has handed out to Koivu, Parise, Pominville, and Suter...he has the Wild in a crappy situation. He brags about it being a complement to the talent he has amassed, but that is an absolute insult to any fan with half a brain! HE has screwed this franchise into the ground with the ridiculous contracts he has negotiated. So...fire Fletch, hire me...and this is how I would fix his problem... I would use the 8 skaters and one goalie option and protect (the 4 have-to's) Koivu, Parise, Pominville, Suter, and then I would protect Brodin, Dumba, Spurgeon, and Neiderrieter...and trade Mikael Granlund for expansion exempt parts. I would take my chances with Coyle, Zucker, Staal, Scandella, Haula, etc...accepting the fact that I'm only going to lose one. The Wild have WAY more organizational depth at forward than they do on the blue line, so this makes the most sense.
All of this is done on the assumption that no NMCs were waived, and Pominville could not be traded prior to the expansion draft.
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
3950 000 $
65 500 000 $
21 500 000 $
75 000 000 $
2950 000 $
2950 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
1950 000 $
Transactions
1.
MIN
    Because of his contract and versatility, Vegas selects Charlie Coyle in the expansion draft...and probably flips him out east for prospect/s or pick/s.
    2.
    MIN
    1. Choix de 1e ronde en 2017 (ANA)
    2. Choix de 1e ronde en 2017 (DAL)
    3. Choix de 2e ronde en 2018 (DAL)
    Détails additionnels:
    Dallas goes all in on offense. FWIW, this trade is mostly an example of the trade to be made with Granlund. The Wild need expansion exempt players and/or picks. The return for Granlund would be very significant.
    DAL
    1. Granlund, Mikael
    2. Reilly, Mike
    Détails additionnels:
    Wild select Gabe Vilardi with the 3OA pick.
    Rachats de contrats
    Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
    2017
    Logo de DAL
    Logo de ANA
    Logo de MIN
    Logo de MIN
    Logo de ARI
    Logo de MIN
    Logo de MIN
    Logo de MIN
    2018
    Logo de MIN
    Logo de DAL
    Logo de MIN
    Logo de MIN
    Logo de MIN
    Logo de WSH
    Logo de MIN
    Logo de MIN
    2019
    Logo de MIN
    Logo de MIN
    Logo de MIN
    Logo de MIN
    Logo de MIN
    Logo de MIN
    TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
    2075 000 000 $64 741 924 $0 $1 037 500 $10 258 076 $
    Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
    2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
    AG, AD
    UFA - 1
    6 750 000 $6 750 000 $
    C
    NMC
    UFA - 1
    5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
    AG, AD
    UFA - 5
    894 166 $894 166 $ (Bonis de performance212 500 $$212K)
    C
    UFA - 2
    3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
    C
    M-NTC
    UFA - 2
    925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance425 000 $$425K)
    AD, AG
    UFA - 2
    7 538 462 $7 538 462 $
    AG
    NMC
    UFA - 8
    925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance400 000 $$400K)
    AD, C
    RFA - 3
    5 600 000 $5 600 000 $
    AD
    M-NTC, NMC
    UFA - 2
    1 150 000 $1 150 000 $
    AD, AG
    UFA - 1
    1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
    C, AG
    UFA - 3
    950 000 $950 000 $
    C
    UFA
    Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
    7 538 462 $7 538 462 $
    DG
    NMC
    UFA - 8
    5 187 500 $5 187 500 $
    DD
    M-NTC
    UFA - 3
    2 166 667 $2 166 667 $
    G
    M-NTC
    UFA - 4
    4 166 667 $4 166 667 $
    DG
    UFA - 4
    2 550 000 $2 550 000 $
    DD
    UFA - 1
    2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
    DG
    UFA - 3
    950 000 $950 000 $
    DD
    UFA - 1
    950 000 $950 000 $
    DG
    UFA - 2

    Code d'intégration

    • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
    • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

    Texte intégré

    Cliquer pour surligner
    17 juin 2017 à 11 h 27
    #1
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: mars 2016
    Messages: 338
    Mentions "j'aime": 32
    Haha you think that'll get you the third overall pick ????????? you're not a gm for a reason
    17 juin 2017 à 11 h 34
    #2
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: mai 2015
    Messages: 19,638
    Mentions "j'aime": 6,770
    If Coyle is left unprotected and not traded for at least a draft pick minimum,which I guarantee a team having interest in that, this is the worst idea I've ever seen.

    You know what would make more sense? Buyout Pominville. Take on the cap penalty for a 4 years but keep arguably one of your best players whose young and in his prime.

    I don't understand this logic of its better to lose one player for nothing than to trade 2 players for cheap assets.....Yeah you lose 3 players as opposed to only 1 but you'll have added assets that in turn will replace the 3 assets lost. Not to mention the cap saving that can be used in the immediate term with UFA's until those assets turn into full time NHL'ers.
    17 juin 2017 à 11 h 56
    #3
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: mars 2017
    Messages: 344
    Mentions "j'aime": 41
    A Wild fan admitting how terrible Chuck Fletcher is makes this a truly great day smile He was made a lot of really bad trades, given out a lot of really bad contracts, and as you mentioned given out all these NMC's. Realistically, it shouldn't have been this difficult to maneuver the expansion draft- trade Nino for an expansion exempt defensman, trade Dumba for expansion exempt forward, and then they don't lose a critical player for nothing- Maybe that's easier said than done.
    If Wild lose one of Dumba or Brodin for nothing to Vegas, Fletcher should be fired immediately!!!
    17 juin 2017 à 12 h 3
    #4
    Démarrer sujet
    MNBassman
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: mai 2015
    Messages: 8,243
    Mentions "j'aime": 3,600
    Quoting: F50marco
    If Coyle is left unprotected and not traded for at least a draft pick minimum,which I guarantee a team having interest in that, this is the worst idea I've ever seen.

    You know what would make more sense? Buyout Pominville. Take on the cap penalty for a 4 years but keep arguably one of your best players whose young and in his prime.

    I don't understand this logic of its better to lose one player for nothing than to trade 2 players for cheap assets.....Yeah you lose 3 players as opposed to only 1 but you'll have added assets that in turn will replace the 3 assets lost. Not to mention the cap saving that can be used in the immediate term with UFA's until those assets turn into full time NHL'ers.


    Coyle is not a player I WANT to lose, but the fact is, the Wild can absorb the loss of him better than they can a defenseman. They have a plethora of highly-touted forward prospects knocking at the door, but almost nothing in the way of NHL-caliber defenseman in the system. This is the reason I would make the decision to expose more forwards and risk losing Coyle or Zucker or Staal.
    17 juin 2017 à 12 h 4
    #5
    Démarrer sujet
    MNBassman
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: mai 2015
    Messages: 8,243
    Mentions "j'aime": 3,600
    Quoting: jccamps18
    A Wild fan admitting how terrible Chuck Fletcher is makes this a truly great day smile He was made a lot of really bad trades, given out a lot of really bad contracts, and as you mentioned given out all these NMC's. Realistically, it shouldn't have been this difficult to maneuver the expansion draft- trade Nino for an expansion exempt defensman, trade Dumba for expansion exempt forward, and then they don't lose a critical player for nothing- Maybe that's easier said than done.
    If Wild lose one of Dumba or Brodin for nothing to Vegas, Fletcher should be fired immediately!!!


    I agree!!
     
    Répondre
    To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
    Question:
    Options:
    Ajouter une option
    Soumettre le sondage