SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Montreal rumor

Créé par: Hockeyplayer1
Équipe: 2017-18 Blackhawks de Chicago
Date de création initiale: 16 juin 2017
Publié: 16 juin 2017
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
Saw it on reddit so obviously taken with a grain of salt but never the less its interesting.
Maybe there is no pick involved in the Montreal trade. It's hard to judge.
I explained the Vegas situation. I'd love to keep TVR because he is drastically underrated for his role.
Hawks use the all of the picks they have to move up in the draft.

Could run a 21 man roster most of the year to save space for deadline and stay below cap.
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
54 600 000 $
2750 000 $
2750 000 $
1700 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
,, Backup
2925 000 $
Transactions
1.
CHI
  1. Pacioretty, Max
  2. Choix de 2e ronde en 2017 (WSH)
Détails additionnels:
Right to Alex Galchenyuk
2.
CHI
  1. Choix de 3e ronde en 2017 (VGK)
Détails additionnels:
Vegas has power but the Hawks could easily trade TVR to someone else so Vegas HAS to take Kruger. In this situation Vegas gets two very decent roster players instead of one overpaid 3-4C
3.
CHI
  1. Choix de 1e ronde en 2017 (TBL)
TBL
  1. Choix de 1e ronde en 2017 (CHI)
  2. Choix de 2e ronde en 2017 (CHI)
  3. Choix de 3e ronde en 2017 (VGK)
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2017
Logo de TBL
Logo de WSH
Logo de OTT
Logo de CHI
Logo de CAR
Logo de STL
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de NYI
Logo de ANA
2018
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
2019
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de ANA
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2375 000 000 $66 910 628 $3 558 000 $1 257 500 $8 089 372 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
4 050 000 $4 050 000 $
AG
UFA - 2
10 500 000 $10 500 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 6
2 800 000 $2 800 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2
778 333 $778 333 $ (Bonis de performance182 500 $$182K)
AG, AD
UFA - 3
4 600 000 $4 600 000 $
AG, C, AD
UFA - 3
2 625 000 $2 625 000 $
AD
NMC
UFA - 6
863 333 $863 333 $
C, AD
UFA - 1
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance650 000 $$650K)
AD, C
UFA - 2
5 275 000 $5 275 000 $
AD
NMC
UFA - 4
750 000 $750 000 $
C
UFA - 1
750 000 $750 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 2
925 000 $925 000 $
C, AG, AD
UFA - 1
925 000 $925 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2
750 000 $750 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
5 538 462 $5 538 462 $
DG
NMC
UFA - 6
6 875 000 $6 875 000 $
DD
NMC
UFA - 7
6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
G
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 3
872 500 $872 500 $
DG
UFA - 2
4 100 000 $4 100 000 $
DG/DD
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 2
900 000 $900 000 $
DG
UFA - 1
700 000 $700 000 $
DD
RFA - 1
,, Backup
925 000 $925 000 $
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance425 000 $$425K)
DG/DD
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
16 juin 2017 à 15 h 23
#1
AnthonyNeeVee
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2017
Messages: 349
Mentions "j'aime": 5
NOT GOOD DEALS AT ALL
16 juin 2017 à 15 h 27
#2
GM Game v1 v2
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2017
Messages: 1,147
Mentions "j'aime": 266
Pacioretty a 35-goal scorer; for Panarin a 30-goal scorer.
Galchenyuk a 20-30-goal scorer with a lot more potential; for Anisimov a 20-goal scorer at the tail end of his career

I don't see how this makes sense for Montreal. Also note that Galchenyuk is looking at a contract closer to 5-6M.
16 juin 2017 à 15 h 40
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2016
Messages: 2,012
Mentions "j'aime": 556
Quoting: We_Want_The_Cup
Pacioretty a 35-goal scorer; for Panarin a 30-goal scorer.
Galchenyuk a 20-30-goal scorer with a lot more potential; for Anisimov a 20-goal scorer at the tail end of his career

I don't see how this makes sense for Montreal. Also note that Galchenyuk is looking at a contract closer to 5-6M.


What this person said, but add more attitude, its been earned.
16 juin 2017 à 15 h 45
#4
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2016
Messages: 350
Mentions "j'aime": 85
Quoting: RobbStark03
Quoting: We_Want_The_Cup
Pacioretty a 35-goal scorer; for Panarin a 30-goal scorer.
Galchenyuk a 20-30-goal scorer with a lot more potential; for Anisimov a 20-goal scorer at the tail end of his career

I don't see how this makes sense for Montreal. Also note that Galchenyuk is looking at a contract closer to 5-6M.


What this person said, but add more attitude, its been earned.


hahaha
has a mtl fan it's a no for me too
16 juin 2017 à 18 h 41
#5
exo2769
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2015
Messages: 16,218
Mentions "j'aime": 10,761
Modifié 16 juin 2017 à 19 h 2
I'm surprised by MTL fans by this. I see your 35 goals vs 30 goals and raise you 151 points vs 131 points. MTL also pretty desperately needs another big centerman that'll be the two way responsible (and net front presence) player so Drouin and Panarin can just score goals. I do think Chicago wins the trade talent wise, but MTL wins the trade in hockey sense and is a better team with this trade.

***This may also make it easier to resign ARad. I'm sure he'd love to play next to those two!***
17 juin 2017 à 19 h 33
#6
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2016
Messages: 1,152
Mentions "j'aime": 199
Quoting: We_Want_The_Cup
Pacioretty a 35-goal scorer; for Panarin a 30-goal scorer.
Galchenyuk a 20-30-goal scorer with a lot more potential; for Anisimov a 20-goal scorer at the tail end of his career

I don't see how this makes sense for Montreal. Also note that Galchenyuk is looking at a contract closer to 5-6M.


I definitely did not expect people to say that Pacioretty was better than Panarin. So the 151 points vs the 131 means nothing because Pac put in 4 more goals. Hmmmm
Anisimov and Galchenyuk are very similar players except Anisimov plays more of a 2 way game and can penalty kill. Galchenyuk can put up more points.
Anisimov is also not at the tail end of his career. He isn't even 30 years old.
I will be a bit surprised if Galchenyuk gets anything more than 5M per year.

This trade makes Montreal a better team. The only reason Chicago does it is to reduce their cap by 1-2 million.
17 juin 2017 à 19 h 54
#7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2017
Messages: 166
Mentions "j'aime": 9
Quoting: Hockeyplayer1
Quoting: We_Want_The_Cup
Pacioretty a 35-goal scorer; for Panarin a 30-goal scorer.
Galchenyuk a 20-30-goal scorer with a lot more potential; for Anisimov a 20-goal scorer at the tail end of his career

I don't see how this makes sense for Montreal. Also note that Galchenyuk is looking at a contract closer to 5-6M.


I definitely did not expect people to say that Pacioretty was better than Panarin. So the 151 points vs the 131 means nothing because Pac put in 4 more goals. Hmmmm
Anisimov and Galchenyuk are very similar players except Anisimov plays more of a 2 way game and can penalty kill. Galchenyuk can put up more points.
Anisimov is also not at the tail end of his career. He isn't even 30 years old.
I will be a bit surprised if Galchenyuk gets anything more than 5M per year.

This trade makes Montreal a better team. The only reason Chicago does it is to reduce their cap by 1-2 million.


Anisimov is in no way going to improve or is a capable 1C. Galchenyuk still has upside, Panarin played with Kane you cant guarantee hes gonna put up 151 more points, Montreal needs guarantees as a win now
20 juin 2017 à 10 h 15
#8
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2016
Messages: 1,152
Mentions "j'aime": 199
Quoting: shabbaranks
Anisimov is in no way going to improve or is a capable 1C. Galchenyuk still has upside, Panarin played with Kane you cant guarantee hes gonna put up 151 more points, Montreal needs guarantees as a win now


Never said either of those things was going to happen. I explained exactly what the difference between them was. And a 2-way center is more useful to a win now team than a 1-way center. Especially for a team that lacks center depth.
Other players that have played next to Kane have not put up points anywhere near what Panarin did. Kane's point production also increase when playing next to Panarin.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage