SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Offseason

Créé par: Ennis
Équipe: 2023-24 Ducks d'Anaheim
Date de création initiale: 16 mars 2023
Publié: 16 mars 2023
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
DRAFT RESULTS

2OA - Adam Fantilli (C/W)

36 OA - Oliver Bonk (RHD) [Might move up higher in the draft due to him being a RHD... might also depend on the playoffs and memorial cup race]

54OA - Timur Mukhanov (C)

64OA - Danny Nelson (C/W)
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
LISTE DE RÉSERVEANSCAP HIT
3850 000 $
RFAANSCAP HIT
1800 000 $
2850 000 $
21 125 000 $
1925 000 $
21 500 000 $
1800 000 $
88 000 000 $
78 000 000 $
1800 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
11 000 000 $
11 500 000 $
1900 000 $
Transactions
ANA
  1. Choix de 2e ronde en 2024 (VGK)
  2. Choix de 5e ronde en 2024 (VGK)
Détails additionnels:
Any contender
VGK
  1. Henrique, Adam (2 912 500 $ retained)
Détails additionnels:
Flipped at the TDL or Draft
Rachats de contrats
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2023
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de BOS
Logo de COL
Logo de ANA
Logo de MIN
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
2024
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de BOS
Logo de VGK
Logo de ANA
Logo de PIT
Logo de SJS
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de VGK
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
2025
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de MIN
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2383 500 000 $63 952 500 $0 $2 500 000 $19 547 500 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
3 650 000 $3 650 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
8 000 000 $8 000 000 $
C, AG
RFA - 3
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
8 000 000 $8 000 000 $
AD
UFA - 7
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
1 125 000 $1 125 000 $
AG
RFA - 1
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
894 167 $894 167 $ (Bonis de performance2 500 000 $$2M)
C, AG
RFA - 2
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
AD, C
UFA - 4
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
1 295 000 $1 295 000 $
AG, AD
RFA - 1
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
1 800 000 $1 800 000 $
C, AG
RFA - 1
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
5 250 000 $5 250 000 $
AD, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
2 750 000 $2 750 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
425 000 $425 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
863 333 $863 333 $
AD
RFA - 2
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
6 500 000 $6 500 000 $
DG/DD
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
DD
RFA - 3
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
6 400 000 $6 400 000 $
G
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
850 000 $850 000 $
DG
UFA - 1
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
925 000 $925 000 $
G
RFA - 2
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
850 000 $850 000 $
DG/DD
RFA - 1
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
DD
UFA - 2
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
762 500 $762 500 $
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
800 000 $800 000 $
DD
UFA
900 000 $900 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 2

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
16 mars 2023 à 19 h 57
#1
Future Ducks legend
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2022
Messages: 9,863
Mentions "j'aime": 6,656
I think you are a bit rich on Z and T's contracts, looks about right otherwise. I imagine perrault stays down until Henrique is moved, and then Fantilli makes the roster next year once Silfverberg is gone.

I think we are much more aggressive buyers of defensemen in FA.
CHAR et TZ11 a aimé ceci.
16 mars 2023 à 20 h 5
#2
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2022
Messages: 5,341
Mentions "j'aime": 3,416
Quoting: GiggywithGibby
I think you are a bit rich on Z and T's contracts, looks about right otherwise. I imagine perrault stays down until Henrique is moved, and then Fantilli makes the roster next year once Silfverberg is gone.

I think we are much more aggressive buyers of defensemen in FA.


I don’t know if Zegras gets less than 8, but I imagine Terry gets anywhere in the 7-8 range.

This is a weaker UFA class, and I don’t know if the better dmen in the class are willing to go to a rebuilder, unless ANH decides to overpay.

Stecher and Hamonic can be flipped for mid-late assets by the TDL, clearing space to call up Zellweger and Mitts.

Gonna be interesting to see.
16 mars 2023 à 20 h 42
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2022
Messages: 1,027
Mentions "j'aime": 727
Quoting: EvanderKanesLawyer

This is a weaker UFA class, and I don’t know if the better dmen in the class are willing to go to a rebuilder, unless ANH decides to overpay.

Stecher and Hamonic can be flipped for mid-late assets by the TDL, clearing space to call up Zellweger and Mitts.


We'll see how the cap space shakes out. Guys go where they can get paid to a certain extent (eg Klingberg). At a minimum I think they'd resign Shattenkirk over a guy like Stecher.

There are also more than a few options in trade if Verbeek is willing to part with a pick and or prospect. Boston in particular is HARD up against the cap. The Rangers. The Oilers. I really don't think the Ducks will have to settle for scraps as bad as Stecher and Hamonic.

EDIT - Been there done that with Lettieri. There's no reason to go back him, he's nothing but a marginal AHL/NHL bubble guy that gets in the way of a younger guy like Leason.
GiggywithGibby et TZ11 a aimé ceci.
16 mars 2023 à 20 h 46
#4
Future Ducks legend
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2022
Messages: 9,863
Mentions "j'aime": 6,656
Quoting: EvanderKanesLawyer
I don’t know if Zegras gets less than 8, but I imagine Terry gets anywhere in the 7-8 range.

This is a weaker UFA class, and I don’t know if the better dmen in the class are willing to go to a rebuilder, unless ANH decides to overpay.

Stecher and Hamonic can be flipped for mid-late assets by the TDL, clearing space to call up Zellweger and Mitts.

Gonna be interesting to see.


Jack Hughes got 8x8 and he was 1OA and has performed better, Dylan Cozens was 7OA and signed a 7.1x7 I know Zegras is flashy and there is still upside there, but I think he is between 7 and 7.5 for 8 years. He has had defensive and attitude problems this year with a lot of bad penalties. I think Terry slots in around 7x7.
16 mars 2023 à 20 h 49
#5
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2022
Messages: 5,341
Mentions "j'aime": 3,416
Quoting: CHAR
We'll see how the cap space shakes out. Guys go where they can get paid to a certain extent (eg Klingberg). At a minimum I think they'd resign Shattenkirk over a guy like Stecher.

There are also more than a few options in trade if Verbeek is willing to part with a pick and or prospect. Boston in particular is HARD up against the cap. The Rangers. The Oilers. I really don't think the Ducks will have to settle for scraps as bad as Stecher and Hamonic.

EDIT - Been there done that with Lettieri. There's no reason to go back him, he's nothing but a marginal AHL/NHL bubble guy that gets in the way of a younger guy like Leason.


The whole idea is to suck for another year before the team decides to start getting competitive.
A decent UFA dman wont do much, rather than get you a decent asset or two. I cant see a Klingberg situation happening again with Anaheim, again, unless Anaheim decides to overpay. This I can’t really see happening.

Stecher and Hamonic aren’t good, but that’s kind of the point.
16 mars 2023 à 21 h 6
#6
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2022
Messages: 1,027
Mentions "j'aime": 727
Quoting: EvanderKanesLawyer
The whole idea is to suck for another year before the team decides to start getting competitive.


This is where we disagree. The Ducks don't need to try to be bad again, they need to take a small step forward and a competent defense would be that step.
GiggywithGibby et TZ11 a aimé ceci.
16 mars 2023 à 21 h 24
#7
Future Ducks legend
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2022
Messages: 9,863
Mentions "j'aime": 6,656
Quoting: EvanderKanesLawyer
The whole idea is to suck for another year before the team decides to start getting competitive.
A decent UFA dman wont do much, rather than get you a decent asset or two. I cant see a Klingberg situation happening again with Anaheim, again, unless Anaheim decides to overpay. This I can’t really see happening.

Stecher and Hamonic aren’t good, but that’s kind of the point.


The fanbase won't support being intentionally bad, and small market teams can't afford to tank like big markets can (Looking at you Toronto). We expected not to make the playoffs, but not be in the Bedard hunt at start of the season. Now that the mercenaries are gone, the team is starting to come together and is playing better hockey. Adding competent defensemen, allowing the kids time to develop, but overall doing better next year is the goal. We still finish bottom half of standings in 2024, but we need to set the stage to do better, not leave the guys we need to carry is in a loosing environment then decide to snap our fingers one day and suddenly they do well. There's a mental aspect of development we need to consider.
CHAR et TZ11 a aimé ceci.
16 mars 2023 à 22 h 57
#8
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2022
Messages: 1,027
Mentions "j'aime": 727
Quoting: GiggywithGibby
The fanbase won't support being intentionally bad, and small market teams can't afford to tank like big markets can (Looking at you Toronto). We expected not to make the playoffs, but not be in the Bedard hunt at start of the season. Now that the mercenaries are gone, the team is starting to come together and is playing better hockey. Adding competent defensemen, allowing the kids time to develop, but overall doing better next year is the goal. We still finish bottom half of standings in 2024, but we need to set the stage to do better, not leave the guys we need to carry is in a loosing environment then decide to snap our fingers one day and suddenly they do well. There's a mental aspect of development we need to consider.


Very well said.
16 mars 2023 à 23 h 17
#9
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2022
Messages: 5,341
Mentions "j'aime": 3,416
Quoting: GiggywithGibby
The fanbase won't support being intentionally bad, and small market teams can't afford to tank like big markets can (Looking at you Toronto). We expected not to make the playoffs, but not be in the Bedard hunt at start of the season. Now that the mercenaries are gone, the team is starting to come together and is playing better hockey. Adding competent defensemen, allowing the kids time to develop, but overall doing better next year is the goal. We still finish bottom half of standings in 2024, but we need to set the stage to do better, not leave the guys we need to carry is in a loosing environment then decide to snap our fingers one day and suddenly they do well. There's a mental aspect of development we need to consider.


Quoting: CHAR
This is where we disagree. The Ducks don't need to try to be bad again, they need to take a small step forward and a competent defense would be that step.


There is genuinely no good UFA dmen in this pool, other than maybe Dumba or Severson, who will probably both end up going to contenders for term, neither would be a good fit for the Ducks.

Sure, they don't need to "try", but this team is still a good 2-3 years out before having a genuine shot at making the playoffs (and that's not even talking about being serious contenders). You have the cap space, but you still have to pay the players.
That's why I signed two dmen you can just move at the TDL and call up Zellweger and Mits after a bit of conditioning.

You don't need to throw the money just because you have it, and at the same time, you can still have the mental fortitude to want to do better. I don't see why they have to be mutually exclusive lmao.
17 mars 2023 à 8 h 48
#10
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2021
Messages: 2,389
Mentions "j'aime": 1,946
Quoting: GiggywithGibby
Jack Hughes got 8x8 and he was 1OA and has performed better, Dylan Cozens was 7OA and signed a 7.1x7 I know Zegras is flashy and there is still upside there, but I think he is between 7 and 7.5 for 8 years. He has had defensive and attitude problems this year with a lot of bad penalties. I think Terry slots in around 7x7.


While I agree with most of what you say, Zegras doesn't have an attitude problem, his attitude is fine. He has a penalty problem, yes, but that's just him being a very emotional player on the ice, attitude, to me, is more of an off ice thing, which Zegras doesn't have. There haven't been any reports of off ice issues with him and looking at his interviews and off ice videos, he's a very humble guy who just has fun on the ice which some people mistake with bad off ice attitude or arrogance (not saying you do, more so fans of other teams).
Ennis a aimé ceci.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage