SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

another offseason

Créé par: qc14
Équipe: 2023-24 Capitals de Washington
Date de création initiale: 8 mars 2023
Publié: 8 mars 2023
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
Let Protas, Lapierre, Frank, Malenstyn, and Snively battle out for the two remaining LW spots during camp.
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
21 000 000 $
22 500 000 $
1775 000 $
1775 000 $
1775 000 $
1775 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
21 500 000 $
21 500 000 $
Transactions
1.
WSH
    Future Considerations
    CAR
    1. Mantha, Anthony
    Détails additionnels:
    Nothing CAR likes more than taking forwards on expiring deals for free
    2.
    WSH
    1. Schmaltz, Nick
    Détails additionnels:
    Schmaltz is owed 7.5, 8.5, and 8.5m in real dollars over the rest of his contract, the Chychrun trade proved that AZ still cares a whole lot about paying as little as possible. Return is like the Chychrun deal less than what people might think -- Caps can take on his entire contract and not send any money back.
    ARI
    1. McMichael, Connor
    2. Choix de 3e ronde en 2024 (WSH)
    Détails additionnels:
    BMac said that he wants to add a skilled, younger, top 6 forward -- Schmaltz fits that billing perfectly.
    Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
    2023
    Logo de WSH
    Logo de WSH
    Logo de WSH
    Logo de WSH
    Logo de WSH
    2024
    Logo de WSH
    Logo de BOS
    Logo de MIN
    Logo de WSH
    Logo de WSH
    Logo de WSH
    Logo de WSH
    2025
    Logo de WSH
    Logo de WSH
    Logo de BOS
    Logo de COL
    Logo de WSH
    Logo de WSH
    Logo de WSH
    Logo de WSH
    Logo de WSH
    TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
    2383 500 000 $78 301 667 $20 000 $315 000 $5 198 333 $

    Formation

    Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
    Logo de Capitals de Washington
    9 500 000 $9 500 000 $
    AG
    M-NTC, NMC
    UFA - 3
    Logo de Capitals de Washington
    3 900 000 $3 900 000 $
    C
    M-NTC
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Capitals de Washington
    5 166 667 $5 166 667 $
    AD
    M-NTC
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Capitals de Washington
    863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance232 500 $$232K)
    C
    RFA - 2
    Logo de Capitals de Washington
    9 200 000 $9 200 000 $
    C
    M-NTC
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Coyotes de l'Arizona
    5 850 000 $5 850 000 $
    AD, C
    M-NTC
    UFA - 3
    Logo de Capitals de Washington
    1 900 000 $1 900 000 $
    AG, AD
    UFA - 3
    Logo de Capitals de Washington
    5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
    C
    UFA - 5
    Logo de Capitals de Washington
    5 750 000 $5 750 000 $
    AD
    M-NTC
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Capitals de Washington
    789 167 $789 167 $ (Bonis de performance82 500 $$82K)
    AD, AG, C
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Capitals de Washington
    1 300 000 $1 300 000 $
    C
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Capitals de Washington
    1 225 000 $1 225 000 $
    AD
    UFA - 1
    Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
    1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
    DG
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Capitals de Washington
    8 000 000 $8 000 000 $
    DD
    M-NTC
    UFA - 3
    Logo de Capitals de Washington
    5 250 000 $5 250 000 $
    G
    M-NTC
    UFA - 4
    Logo de Capitals de Washington
    1 400 000 $1 400 000 $
    DG
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Capitals de Washington
    4 050 000 $4 050 000 $
    DD
    UFA - 3
    Logo de Capitals de Washington
    1 100 000 $1 100 000 $
    G
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Capitals de Washington
    2 500 000 $2 500 000 $
    DG/DD
    RFA - 3
    Logo de Capitals de Washington
    1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
    DD
    UFA - 3
    Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
    Logo de Capitals de Washington
    1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
    DG/DD
    RFA - 2
    Logo de Capitals de Washington
    762 500 $762 500 $
    C, AG
    RFA - 1
    Logo de Capitals de Washington
    775 000 $775 000 $
    C
    RFA - 1

    Code d'intégration

    • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
    • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

    Texte intégré

    Cliquer pour surligner
    8 mars 2023 à 12 h 19
    #1
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juin 2020
    Messages: 9,552
    Mentions "j'aime": 3,045
    Schmaltz will be a little more expensive than that
    8 mars 2023 à 12 h 49
    #2
    Lets Get Kraken
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: avr. 2021
    Messages: 8,836
    Mentions "j'aime": 3,523
    There is a difference between Patches and Mantha. Patches was still a positive asset and Vegas was desperate to clear cap. The Caps are not desperate to clear cap, and Mantha can hardly be considered a positive asset anymore, net neutral at best. Add in the fact that it’s an in division rivalry move, the Canes have no reason to help the Caps for free, and likely won’t take Mantha for free. A somewhat decent situational comparable would be the trade that sent Marleau to Carolina.

    Arizona won’t be considering that. That isn’t enough to get Shmaltz.
    8 mars 2023 à 13 h 7
    #3
    Démarrer sujet
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: sept. 2020
    Messages: 3,431
    Mentions "j'aime": 1,947
    Quoting: evelutions2
    There is a difference between Patches and Mantha. Patches was still a positive asset and Vegas was desperate to clear cap. The Caps are not desperate to clear cap, and Mantha can hardly be considered a positive asset anymore, net neutral at best. Add in the fact that it’s an in division rivalry move, the Canes have no reason to help the Caps for free, and likely won’t take Mantha for free. A somewhat decent situational comparable would be the trade that sent Marleau to Carolina.

    Arizona won’t be considering that. That isn’t enough to get Shmaltz.


    I think Mantha on an expiring deal holds a bit more value than people think, and as you said unlike Vegas the Caps aren't desperate for the space, which would make them less likely to literally give him away for free. Carolina has 30m in space with no one important needing a raise, and still have a definite need at wing. Not saying its 100% going to happen or even their best option, but it would be very much in line with how they operate to take a flyer on someone like Mantha (who's underlying stats say he deserves a bigger role and more leeway) rather than give out a big contract in FA or give up futures for someone. Marleau was a significantly worse player making more money and the price TOR gave up to move him was widely considered a massive overpayment.

    As for Schmaltz, this may be a little low but not by a significant margin IMO. I once again think people will be surprised at how willingly ARZ will move him along. Its a whole lot of real dollars to be paying for a team that will pinch any penny they can
    8 mars 2023 à 14 h 11
    #4
    Big caps fan
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: janv. 2022
    Messages: 98
    Mentions "j'aime": 11
    No way for mantha no way for Mcmichal
    8 mars 2023 à 15 h 8
    #5
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: avr. 2021
    Messages: 2,173
    Mentions "j'aime": 1,000
    Quoting: qc14
    I think Mantha on an expiring deal holds a bit more value than people think, and as you said unlike Vegas the Caps aren't desperate for the space, which would make them less likely to literally give him away for free. Carolina has 30m in space with no one important needing a raise, and still have a definite need at wing. Not saying its 100% going to happen or even their best option, but it would be very much in line with how they operate to take a flyer on someone like Mantha (who's underlying stats say he deserves a bigger role and more leeway) rather than give out a big contract in FA or give up futures for someone. Marleau was a significantly worse player making more money and the price TOR gave up to move him was widely considered a massive overpayment.

    As for Schmaltz, this may be a little low but not by a significant margin IMO. I once again think people will be surprised at how willingly ARZ will move him along. Its a whole lot of real dollars to be paying for a team that will pinch any penny they can


    They’re not interested in moving schmaltz, if they were he’d be gone already.
     
    Répondre
    To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
    Question:
    Options:
    Ajouter une option
    Soumettre le sondage