SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Flat Cap Realistic, Mike Smith, looking for a ton of Flames feedback.

Créé par: PhatRas
Équipe: 2017-18 Flames de Calgary
Date de création initiale: 14 juin 2017
Publié: 14 juin 2017
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
---Kulikov is coming off a bad year, I think that he could bounce back and on a two year "show me" contract he could prove worth and extension down the line, at his age he fits well with this group. Problem could be other teams out bidding that term.

---I think Smith is a good fit for two years while Gilles and Parsons develop. While Johnson has another kick at the can to push an aging goalie for a job.

---I don't think this is flashy but I think it improves our team, would be nice to find a top line RW but I think Ferland has earned a shot and with more depth in Bennett, Lazar, Jankowski all able to play the wing and center, they shouldn't hesitate to give those guys a shot if Ferland isn't performing.

---Some nice pieces could be flipped at the deadline for a top RW if we are in that position ie. Kylington, Rittich, Bouma, possibly Ferland, I would love to make the big moves now but I believe we need to see how the season plays out then decide when we go big with our prospect pool.
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
32 650 000 $
21 650 000 $
2995 000 $
2900 000 $
31 000 000 $
1950 000 $
1975 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
11 900 000 $
31 975 000 $
42 000 000 $
23 500 000 $
Transactions
1.
CGY
  1. Choix de 3e ronde en 2018 (CGY)
STL
    Did not re-sign Brian Elliott
    2.
    CGY
      Re-signed Michael Stone
      ARI
      1. Choix de 5e ronde en 2018 (CGY)
      3.
      CGY
        Shinkaruk is comp to keep Kulak a Flame
        VGK
        1. Shinkaruk, Hunter
        2. Stajan, Matt
        4.
        CGY
        1. Smith, Mike (1 416 667 $ retained)
        2. Choix de 3e ronde en 2018 (ARI)
        Détails additionnels:
        25% Retained
        ARI
        1. Choix de 2e ronde en 2018 (CGY)
        2. Choix de 4e ronde en 2018 (FLA)
        Détails additionnels:
        Pick will become a 1st round pick if:
        Smith finishes in the top 10 for SV% and GAA
        or
        Flames make the conference finals and he plays at least half the playoffs
        Rachats de contrats
        Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
        2017
        Logo de CGY
        Logo de CGY
        Logo de CGY
        Logo de CGY
        Logo de CGY
        2018
        Logo de CGY
        Logo de CGY
        Logo de ARI
        Logo de CGY
        Logo de CGY
        Logo de CGY
        2019
        Logo de CGY
        Logo de CGY
        Logo de CGY
        Logo de CGY
        Logo de CGY
        Logo de CGY
        Logo de CGY
        TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
        2373 000 000 $64 418 733 $660 000 $1 487 500 $8 581 267 $
        Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
        Gaudreau, Johnny
        6 750 000 $6 750 000 $
        AG
        UFA - 5
        Monahan, Sean
        6 375 000 $6 375 000 $
        C, AG, AD
        UFA - 6
        Ferland, Micheal
        1 650 000 $1 650 000 $
        AG, AD
        UFA - 2
        Tkachuk, Matthew
        925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
        AD
        UFA - 2
        Backlund, Mikael
        3 575 000 $3 575 000 $
        C
        UFA - 1
        Frolík, Michael
        4 300 000 $4 300 000 $
        AG, AD
        M-NTC
        UFA - 3
        Jankowski, Mark
        925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance637 500 $$638K)
        C, AG
        UFA - 1
        Versteeg, Kris
        1 975 000 $1 975 000 $
        AG, AD
        UFA - 1
        Bennett, Sam
        2 650 000 $2 650 000 $
        C
        UFA - 2
        Lazar, Curtis
        950 000 $950 000 $
        AD, C
        UFA - 2
        Brouwer, Troy
        4 500 000 $4 500 000 $
        AG, AD
        NTC
        UFA - 3
        Bouma, Lance
        1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
        C, AG, AD
        UFA - 1
        Hamilton, Freddie
        612 500 $612 500 $
        C, AD
        UFA - 1
        Hathaway, Garnet
        900 000 $900 000 $
        AD, AG
        UFA - 1
        Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
        Giordano, Mark
        3 375 000 $3 375 000 $
        DG
        NTC
        UFA - 5
        Hamilton, Dougie
        5 750 000 $5 750 000 $
        DD
        UFA - 4
        Smith, Mike
        2 833 333 $2 833 333 $
        G
        M-NTC
        UFA - 2
        Brodie, TJ
        4 650 400 $4 650 400 $
        DG/DD
        M-NTC
        UFA - 3
        Kulikov, Dmitry
        3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
        DG/DD
        UFA - 3
        Johnson, Chad
        1 900 000 $1 900 000 $
        G
        UFA - 1
        Kulak, Brett
        1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
        DG/DD
        UFA - 1
        Stone, Michael
        2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
        DD
        UFA - 3
        Bartkowski, Matt
        612 500 $612 500 $
        DD
        UFA - 1

        Code d'intégration

        • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
        • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

        Texte intégré

        Cliquer pour surligner
        14 juin 2017 à 17 h 9
        #1
        ItWasIn
        CGY
        Avatar de l'utilisateur
        Rejoint: déc. 2015
        Messages: 5,552
        Mentions "j'aime": 2,069
        I like Smith, but I think ARI may be hesitant to move him within the division
        14 juin 2017 à 17 h 23
        #2
        PhatRas
        Démarrer sujet
        Banni
        Avatar de l'utilisateur
        Rejoint: avr. 2017
        Messages: 927
        Mentions "j'aime": 305
        Quoting: JQuick32
        I like Smith, but I think ARI may be hesitant to move him within the division


        I don't disagree with that, I do think though, that Calgary with the conditional possibly being a first is paying a fairly steep price for a goalie with two years left on potentially his last contract. I think Arizona with new ownership will be ready to take a new direction making Smith more available than previously before.
        14 juin 2017 à 17 h 43
        #3
        Tkachinla
        Avatar de l'utilisateur
        Rejoint: juill. 2016
        Messages: 2,232
        Mentions "j'aime": 401
        That conditional 1st for Smith would need to be more like: 1) Smith plays > 40 games during regular season, 2) Smith has a Top 10 SV% during regular season, 3) CGY makes it to second round of playoffs, Smith plays >50% of games during playoffs

        With younger options out there, it's not worth overpaying for Smith, even if he has shown he can face a lot of pucks and stop them pretty well. He's 35, you've mentioned his contract price and length, etc. My preference is to add a goalie who might be around for a bit longer than 2 years and will still have asset value in 3-4 years when (hopefully) one of Gillies, Rittich, or Parsons is ready to start at the NHL level. A younger guy today who can play NHL minutes is a hedge on CGY's internal candidates not developing into a starter, plus a hedge on future value of the goalie paid for today (with picks/prospects) if one of the internal guys works out.
        14 juin 2017 à 18 h 3
        #4
        PhatRas
        Démarrer sujet
        Banni
        Avatar de l'utilisateur
        Rejoint: avr. 2017
        Messages: 927
        Mentions "j'aime": 305
        Quoting: Vanderm
        That conditional 1st for Smith would need to be more like: 1) Smith plays > 40 games during regular season, 2) Smith has a Top 10 SV% during regular season, 3) CGY makes it to second round of playoffs, Smith plays >50% of games during playoffs

        With younger options out there, it's not worth overpaying for Smith, even if he has shown he can face a lot of pucks and stop them pretty well. He's 35, you've mentioned his contract price and length, etc. My preference is to add a goalie who might be around for a bit longer than 2 years and will still have asset value in 3-4 years when (hopefully) one of Gillies, Rittich, or Parsons is ready to start at the NHL level. A younger guy today who can play NHL minutes is a hedge on CGY's internal candidates not developing into a starter, plus a hedge on future value of the goalie paid for today (with picks/prospects) if one of the internal guys works out.


        I like that thought as well, if we get a guy like Grubauer or Raanta and they come over play lights out we can extend them and then one of those three young prospects become a great trade asset!
         
        Répondre
        To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
        Question:
        Options:
        Ajouter une option
        Soumettre le sondage