SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Fauteuil - DG

trade

Créé par: juju54
Équipe: 2022-23 Oilers d'Edmonton
Date de création initiale: 19 févr. 2023
Publié: 19 févr. 2023
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Transactions
1.
EDM
  1. Kane, Patrick (5 250 000 $ retained)
CHI
2.
EDM
    50%$
    ARI
    1. Kane, Patrick
    2. Choix de 2e ronde en 2023 (EDM)
    3.
    EDM
    1. Kane, Patrick
    Détails additionnels:
    7485000 total retaine
    CHI
    1. Choix de 1e ronde en 2023 (EDM)
    2. Choix de 3e ronde en 2023 (EDM)
    3. Choix de 2e ronde en 2024 (EDM)
    4.
    EDM
      ballotage
      5.
      EDM
      ARI
      1. Campbell, Jack
      2. Choix de 1e ronde en 2025 (EDM)
      Détails additionnels:
      conditionnel si campbelle play 45% des match durant son contrat le 1 devien le 2 e en 2026
      6.
      SEA
      1. Kane, Evander
      2. Lavoie, Raphael
      3. Choix de 6e ronde en 2023 (EDM)
      7.
      MTL
      1. Choix de 1e ronde en 2024 (EDM)
      8.
      9.
      EDM
      1. Choix de 3e ronde en 2025 (ARI)
      Détails additionnels:
      conditionnel si foegele plays 80 match avec larizona le 3 e choix devien un 2 e choix en 2025
      10.
      11.
      Rachats de contrats
      Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
      Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
      2023
      Logo de EDM
      Logo de EDM
      2024
      Logo de EDM
      Logo de EDM
      Logo de EDM
      2025
      Logo de EDM
      Logo de ARI
      Logo de EDM
      Logo de EDM
      Logo de EDM
      Logo de EDM
      TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
      2182 500 000 $77 557 666 $896 000 $850 000 $4 942 334 $
      Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
      Logo de Kraken de Seattle
      5 166 666 $5 166 666 $
      C, AG, AD
      M-NTC
      UFA - 3
      Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
      6 300 000 $6 300 000 $
      C
      NMC
      UFA - 1
      Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
      2 625 000 $2 625 000 $
      AD
      NMC
      UFA - 1
      Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
      5 125 000 $5 125 000 $
      AG, C
      NMC
      UFA - 7
      Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
      8 500 000 $8 500 000 $
      C, AG
      M-NTC, NMC
      UFA - 3
      Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
      3 100 000 $3 100 000 $
      AD
      RFA - 2
      Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
      3 400 000 $3 400 000 $
      AD, AG
      UFA - 3
      Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
      1 250 000 $1 250 000 $
      C, AD
      UFA - 1
      Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
      5 500 000 $5 500 000 $
      AD, AG
      NMC
      UFA - 6
      Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
      1 250 000 $1 250 000 $
      AG, AD
      UFA - 1
      Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
      798 000 $798 000 $
      C
      RFA - 1
      Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
      850 000 $850 000 $
      AG, C, AD
      UFA - 1
      Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
      Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
      9 250 000 $9 250 000 $
      DG
      NMC
      UFA - 8
      Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
      4 500 000 $4 500 000 $
      DD
      UFA - 2
      Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
      4 100 000 $4 100 000 $
      DG
      UFA - 2
      Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
      -625 000 $-625 000 $
      DG/DD
      M-NTC
      UFA - 2
      Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
      750 000 $750 000 $
      G
      UFA - 1
      Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
      4 167 000 $4 167 000 $
      DG
      M-NTC
      UFA - 1
      Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
      2 750 000 $2 750 000 $
      DG/DD
      UFA - 4
      Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
      2 875 000 $2 875 000 $
      G
      UFA - 1
      Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
      Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
      863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
      DD
      RFA - 1
      Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
      2 200 000 $2 200 000 $
      G
      UFA - 1
      Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
      750 000 $750 000 $
      DG
      UFA - 1

      Code d'intégration

      • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
      • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

      Texte intégré

      Cliquer pour surligner
      19 févr. 2023 à 8 h 59
      #1
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: juin 2019
      Messages: 188
      Mentions "j'aime": 104
      Avs accept
      NMAvsFan a aimé ceci.
      19 févr. 2023 à 11 h 36
      #2
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: janv. 2017
      Messages: 9,606
      Mentions "j'aime": 4,584
      I'll be different to the other two Avs fans on here and say Avs decline as I really don't see the gap between MacKinnon and McDavid as all that great.
      juju54 a aimé ceci.
      19 févr. 2023 à 11 h 53
      #3
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: août 2020
      Messages: 11,447
      Mentions "j'aime": 9,083
      Quoting: NOTJoeSakic
      Avs accept


      No they don’t.
      TJTwolf a aimé ceci.
      19 févr. 2023 à 11 h 55
      #4
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: août 2020
      Messages: 11,447
      Mentions "j'aime": 9,083
      Avs aren’t trading Toews to up to McDavid especially considering MacKinnon’s locked in for 8 yrs and McDavid’s next contract is going to be insane high $15M at least.
      TJTwolf a aimé ceci.
      19 févr. 2023 à 13 h 19
      #5
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: juin 2019
      Messages: 188
      Mentions "j'aime": 104
      Quoting: Xqb15a
      Avs aren’t trading Toews to up to McDavid especially considering MacKinnon’s locked in for 8 yrs and McDavid’s next contract is going to be insane high $15M at least.


      So $2.4M more than MacKinnon. Worth it
      19 févr. 2023 à 14 h 28
      #6
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: août 2020
      Messages: 11,447
      Mentions "j'aime": 9,083
      Quoting: NOTJoeSakic
      So $2.4M more than MacKinnon. Worth it

      No it’s not, it makes EDM significantly better defensively and COL significantly worse defensively especially with all the extra ice time your favorite whipping boy Girard gets.
      TJTwolf a aimé ceci.
      19 févr. 2023 à 14 h 43
      #7
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: juin 2019
      Messages: 188
      Mentions "j'aime": 104
      Quoting: Xqb15a
      No it’s not, it makes EDM significantly better defensively and COL significantly worse defensively especially with all the extra ice time your favorite whipping boy Girard gets.


      I agree to disagree. Avs likely wont be able to afford Toews moving forward anyway. Also Girard isnt my Favorite whipping boy lol He is a top 4 LD on most teams. Currently he is best trade chip Avs have with Toews and Byram on left side and Avs have a hole at 2C and no Cap space so ya he is in some mock trades for 2Cs
      19 févr. 2023 à 15 h 14
      #8
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: janv. 2017
      Messages: 9,606
      Mentions "j'aime": 4,584
      Quoting: NOTJoeSakic
      I agree to disagree. Avs likely wont be able to afford Toews moving forward anyway. Also Girard isnt my Favorite whipping boy lol He is a top 4 LD on most teams. Currently he is best trade chip Avs have with Toews and Byram on left side and Avs have a hole at 2C and no Cap space so ya he is in some mock trades for 2Cs


      Exactly. He's arguably their best trade chip, so if you take this scenario and trade Toews as well, what are you left with on the left D? Byram, Englund, Hunt, MacDermid. They'll need to re-sign Toews and the difference between MacKinnon and McDavid is most definitely not Toews. As Xqb says you make Edmonton Better defensively and have little effect on weakening their offence, and have little effect on Colorado's offence whilst weakening their D. Terrible idea.
      19 févr. 2023 à 15 h 20
      #9
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: juin 2019
      Messages: 188
      Mentions "j'aime": 104
      Quoting: TJTwolf
      Exactly. He's arguably their best trade chip, so if you take this scenario and trade Toews as well, what are you left with on the left D? Byram, Englund, Hunt, MacDermid. They'll need to re-sign Toews and the difference between MacKinnon and McDavid is most definitely not Toews. As Xqb says you make Edmonton Better defensively and have little effect on weakening their offence, and have little effect on Colorado's offence whilst weakening their D. Terrible idea.


      I wouldnt trade Girard if Toews was traded. I would have Byram Girard down left side and add a cheap bottom pair D. Still down a 2C I would trades picks and prospects for.
      19 févr. 2023 à 15 h 22
      #10
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: janv. 2017
      Messages: 9,606
      Mentions "j'aime": 4,584
      Quoting: NOTJoeSakic
      I wouldnt trade Girard if Toews was traded. I would have Byram Girard down left side and add a cheap bottom pair D. Still down a 2C I would trades picks and prospects for.


      If you're lucky as you've now removed your best trade chip and sunk further into the hole of trading out the farm. It's a stupid idea.
      19 févr. 2023 à 15 h 28
      #11
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: juin 2019
      Messages: 188
      Mentions "j'aime": 104
      Quoting: TJTwolf
      If you're lucky as you've now removed your best trade chip and sunk further into the hole of trading out the farm. It's a stupid idea.


      Again I disagree. I love Toews and MacKinnon but McDavid is in a league of his own and if that was the trade I believe you can make that work. Not worried about the Farm at this time.
      19 févr. 2023 à 15 h 41
      #12
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: janv. 2017
      Messages: 9,606
      Mentions "j'aime": 4,584
      Quoting: NOTJoeSakic
      Again I disagree. I love Toews and MacKinnon but McDavid is in a league of his own and if that was the trade I believe you can make that work. Not worried about the Farm at this time.


      I don't for a minute think either team would contemplate it and McDavid isn't close to being in a league of his own, even Gretzky wasn't because Lemieux. Thank God you're NOTJoeSakic (or even GMCM) is about all there is left to say then!
      19 févr. 2023 à 15 h 49
      #13
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: juin 2019
      Messages: 188
      Mentions "j'aime": 104
      Quoting: TJTwolf
      I don't for a minute think either team would contemplate it and McDavid isn't close to being in a league of his own, even Gretzky wasn't because Lemieux. Thank God you're NOTJoeSakic (or even GMCM) is about all there is left to say then!


      You seem unreasonably worked up over this fake trade scenario
      19 févr. 2023 à 16 h 6
      #14
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: janv. 2017
      Messages: 9,606
      Mentions "j'aime": 4,584
      Quoting: NOTJoeSakic
      You seem unreasonably worked up over this fake trade scenario


      Not sure why expressing an opinion should make me appear 'unreasonably worked up'. Perhaps you have an aversion to debate.
      NOTJoeSakic a aimé ceci.
       
      Répondre
      To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
      Question:
      Options:
      Ajouter une option
      Soumettre le sondage