Minnesota doesn't want boeser, and Winger isn't a need

I'd say both will get only a 3rd and 4th pick like the Bkjorstrand deal from Columbus. The team would be lucky if they got a 2nd or a prospect

Rather retain for 2 years on Boeser than 4 years on Garland

I figured but wasn't entirely sure

Vancouver should've traded Boeser last season when his value was still high. As it stands, I could see him going for a 4th or a classic "hockey trade" player swap, but not much higher than that atm.

As for Garland, I love his game and he'd be a good fit for a playoff team. Could see someone willing to pay a 2nd round pick if retention is included, but he'd probably get a Bjorkstrand-like package without retention.

Donovan Sebrango and Pontus Andreasson for Boeser with no retention?

Maybe…

Boeser at full AAV - 3rd, 5th (Drance said “less than Bjorkstrand return”).

Boeser at 25% - 2nd+3rd

Boeser at 50% - late 1st

What team wants him? Would jersey make the trade for Boeser at 25% retained?

Boeser 2.65 mil retained for Walsh and a conditional second round pick that turns into a first depending on performance?

Would probably be pick+player. 2nd or 3rd depending on prospect. The Severson-for-Boeser thing seems to be resurfacing as well.




I probably would. Walsh’s value is kind of mystery box though.