Whatever total value you think that package has, make a package with the same value but in 2-3 pieces.

You clearly don't know who Minten is, look at his scouting report and see how he is doing. He has a chance to be a 2nd line / 3rd line Centre. If you think you're getting Knies, Leafs laugh

Where in this comment do you imagine I asked for Knies to acquire ROR? In fact, where do you imagine I've ever said such a thing? I know who Minten is. He's a B prospect AND he's the most enticing piece among five - that's not a good review of an ROR trade offer, man.

But you do you. Put it in 2-3 pieces and have a real discussion or put it in five and have everyone just kinda go by without commenting because it's not going to work in real life. Bonne chance.

I did give value. if he is a pure rental though, I wouldn't even consider throwing in Minten

1 - Right, but I said make the same amount of value more compact.

2 - Heh. Good luck with that approach.

Ok just trade him to Boston then or something. I'm sure their strong prospect pool would be enticing

Mintens upside is probably around that of a 3rd line Center which is fine, he's a solid piece.

The issue is all the junk picks that you've thrown in to try and add value.

Just simplify it to the 1st and i dont think anyone would have any issues with it. That's what he was saying condense it to where its not just nickel and diming. That's generally not to appealing when you're looking at it from the other teams perspective.

If you want ROR retained and us to take Kerfoot, try adding the '23 first with Minten and that's the trade. Kerfoot or any of your UFA's are a throw in to make cap work so even if we don't take Kerfoot the ask is Minten and '23 1st IMO.

Then Leafs look else where. We're not throwing all our assets for a rental and Dubas doesn't like rentals anymore. Unless ROR is willing to extend, we will gladly keep Minten and our first