SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

GM for a day

Créé par: icehawk2006
Équipe: 2023-24 Sharks de San Jose
Date de création initiale: 23 déc. 2022
Publié: 27 janv. 2023
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
Could use a goalie, but not sure where they will find one. Will still probably be around that price point anyway.
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
2950 000 $
1852 800 $
2852 800 $
1975 000 $
89 128 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
33 450 000 $
43 175 000 $
1975 000 $
CRÉÉANSCAP HIT
First, 2023
3925 000 $
Transactions
1.
SJS
CHI
  1. Ferraro, Mario
  2. Choix de 2e ronde en 2024 (SJS)
2.
SJS
  1. Choix de 7e ronde en 2025 (PHI)
PHI
  1. Kunin, Luke (1 350 000 $ retained)
3.
Rachats de contrats
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2023
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de CAR
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de CBJ
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de VAN
2024
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de VGK
Logo de SJS
Logo de COL
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
2025
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de PHI
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2183 500 000 $73 262 746 $25 000 $850 000 $10 237 254 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
9 128 000 $9 128 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 8
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
6 750 000 $6 750 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 7
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
4 725 000 $4 725 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
AG
RFA - 3
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
8 000 000 $8 000 000 $
C
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
2 500 000 $2 500 000 $
AD, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
2 500 000 $2 500 000 $
AG
UFA - 1
First, 2023
925 000 $925 000 $
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
1 050 000 $1 050 000 $
C, AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
916 667 $916 667 $
C, AG
RFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
852 800 $852 800 $
C
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
C
UFA - 2
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
3 450 000 $3 450 000 $
DG
UFA - 6
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
10 000 000 $10 000 000 $
DD
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
950 000 $950 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
975 000 $975 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 2
3 175 000 $3 175 000 $
DD
UFA - 8
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
2 750 000 $2 750 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
762 500 $762 500 $
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
1 250 000 $1 250 000 $
DD
UFA - 3
975 000 $975 000 $
DG
UFA
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
2 250 000 $2 250 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
27 janv. 2023 à 1 h 43
#1
train, train
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2015
Messages: 3,024
Mentions "j'aime": 733
Just to clarify, you mean that SJ's receiving a 2nd in exchange for Ferraro, correct? Because you're attaching a 2nd along with Ferraro to ship to CHI for nothing at the moment.

Also, I understand and agree with you on cutting Kunin loose, but SJ doesn't need to retain 1.35mil when they can just buy him out for 250k.
Vizix a aimé ceci.
27 janv. 2023 à 3 h 21
#2
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2017
Messages: 374
Mentions "j'aime": 45
Quoting: CheechYou
Just to clarify, you mean that SJ's receiving a 2nd in exchange for Ferraro, correct? Because you're attaching a 2nd along with Ferraro to ship to CHI for nothing at the moment.

Also, I understand and agree with you on cutting Kunin loose, but SJ doesn't need to retain 1.35mil when they can just buy him out for 250k.


Unfortunately I do mean providing a 2nd for Chicago to take that bad contract off of our hands. It’s a real bummer, because I love the dude, but Ferraro has arguably the worst contract on the team at -6.6M market value. I love the personality, but man is he a black whole. I think this franchise hosed him by bringing him up to early, and playing him beside Burns. He’s established a lot of very bad habits and is frequently out of position. It’s pretty easy to see that other franchises realize he’s very bad too, because opposing coaches jump their scoring lines over the boards as soon as he touches the ice. With 3 years left it will take a 2nd round pick.

I thought about the buyout, but I don’t want that extra year when I need to use the $500k cap space to bridge Eklund and Bords.
Tomas_Hurdle a aimé ceci.
27 janv. 2023 à 10 h 29
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 10,936
Mentions "j'aime": 10,739
Quoting: CheechYou
Just to clarify, you mean that SJ's receiving a 2nd in exchange for Ferraro, correct? Because you're attaching a 2nd along with Ferraro to ship to CHI for nothing at the moment.

Also, I understand and agree with you on cutting Kunin loose, but SJ doesn't need to retain 1.35mil when they can just buy him out for 250k.


Quoting: icehawk2006
Unfortunately I do mean providing a 2nd for Chicago to take that bad contract off of our hands. It’s a real bummer, because I love the dude, but Ferraro has arguably the worst contract on the team at -6.6M market value. I love the personality, but man is he a black whole. I think this franchise hosed him by bringing him up to early, and playing him beside Burns. He’s established a lot of very bad habits and is frequently out of position. It’s pretty easy to see that other franchises realize he’s very bad too, because opposing coaches jump their scoring lines over the boards as soon as he touches the ice. With 3 years left it will take a 2nd round pick.

I thought about the buyout, but I don’t want that extra year when I need to use the $500k cap space to bridge Eklund and Bords.


I definitely wouldn't pay a 2nd for him, but I doubt SJS will have to pay a 2nd to move him. SJS is rebuilding, he is young, and his cap hit is only $3.25M. They are better off waiting and seeing if he can turn things around, rather than throwing away assets to clear space that they don't even need. If nothing else they could bury him or buyout his contract.

But if you really want to do that, CHI accepts.
LuckOne a aimé ceci.
27 janv. 2023 à 10 h 53
#4
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2017
Messages: 374
Mentions "j'aime": 45
Quoting: Garak
I definitely wouldn't pay a 2nd for him, but I doubt SJS will have to pay a 2nd to move him. SJS is rebuilding, he is young, and his cap hit is only $3.25M. They are better off waiting and seeing if he can turn things around, rather than throwing away assets to clear space that they don't even need. If nothing else they could bury him or buyout his contract.

But if you really want to do that, CHI accepts.


He won’t be able to turn things around. He wasn’t projected to be more than a 6/7 D coming out of school and he’s had enough NHL games now that we know what he’s going to be. I wanted to give him the benefit of the doubt last season, that playing with Burns was the reason he was bad, but that isn’t the case. After 120 games of just being really really bad, I can’t imagine GMs view him as an NHLer, and definitely not a 3.3M NHLer.

If it will be less than a 2nd round pick I’ll be thrilled. But honestly because of that third year, I’m confident that’s what will be required to take his entire salary.

The buyout option has to much money for too many years on the books and burying only saved $1M. Not substantial enough of a cap savings for either.
27 janv. 2023 à 11 h 14
#5
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 10,936
Mentions "j'aime": 10,739
Quoting: icehawk2006
He won’t be able to turn things around. He wasn’t projected to be more than a 6/7 D coming out of school and he’s had enough NHL games now that we know what he’s going to be. I wanted to give him the benefit of the doubt last season, that playing with Burns was the reason he was bad, but that isn’t the case. After 120 games of just being really really bad, I can’t imagine GMs view him as an NHLer, and definitely not a 3.3M NHLer.

If it will be less than a 2nd round pick I’ll be thrilled. But honestly because of that third year, I’m confident that’s what will be required to take his entire salary.

The buyout option has to much money for too many years on the books and burying only saved $1M. Not substantial enough of a cap savings for either.


But again, they are rebuilding. So there is no reason to move his contract right now, they don't need the cap space. They could bury him or shelter him as the 6th or 7th dman and buy out his contract in 1-2- or even 3 years. The cap is set to go up after next season and continue to go up beyond that. His cap hit, whether it is bought out or not, will become more and more negligible. Unless they want to go for a fast paced retool instead of a rebuild and absolutely need the space ASAP, there is no reason to send out a 2nd round pick to move his contract.
27 janv. 2023 à 15 h 6
#6
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2017
Messages: 374
Mentions "j'aime": 45
Quoting: Garak
But again, they are rebuilding. So there is no reason to move his contract right now, they don't need the cap space. They could bury him or shelter him as the 6th or 7th dman and buy out his contract in 1-2- or even 3 years. The cap is set to go up after next season and continue to go up beyond that. His cap hit, whether it is bought out or not, will become more and more negligible. Unless they want to go for a fast paced retool instead of a rebuild and absolutely need the space ASAP, there is no reason to send out a 2nd round pick to move his contract.


The team that I have put together is not a rebuilding team and would be a playoff team, and not just a first round out.
27 janv. 2023 à 15 h 13
#7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 10,936
Mentions "j'aime": 10,739
Quoting: icehawk2006
The team that I have put together is not a rebuilding team and would be a playoff team, and not just a first round out.


Oh, would they now? Interesting. Well then, CHI probably accepts.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage