SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Trade Machine Proposals

As per trade request

Créé par: Suh_Baud
Publié: 22 janv. 2023 à 18 h 56
Plafond salarial: 82 500 000 $
Journées à la saison: 81/185 (44%)
Détermination du registraire central: Cette transaction a été refusée, car une des équipes excède la limite permise de 23 joueurs sur la formation

Logo de Kings de Los AngelesKings de Los Angeles

DépartStatutSalaire retenuCap hit effectifFormationSPCListe de réserveChoix 1e rd2e et 3e rd4e à 7e rdPJGAPMBA%EFF
Iafallo, AlexKings de Los AngelesLNH-1 751 351 $011---2571017--
Turcotte, AlexExempté du ballottageKings de Los AngelesLNH-391 500 $011---0000--
Choix de 1e ronde en 2023 (Logo de Kings de Los AngelesLAK)---100------
Choix de 2e ronde en 2024 (Logo de Kings de Los AngelesLAK)---010------
ArrivéeStatutSalaire retenuCap hit effectifFormationSPCListe de réserveChoix 1e rd2e et 3e rd4e à 7e rdPJGAPMBA%EFF
Pettersson, EliasCanucks de VancouverLNH-3 218 108 $011---44193554--
VariationEspace sous le plafond salarialFormationSPCListe de réserveChoix 1e rd2e et 3e rd4e à 7e rdPJGAPMBA%EFF
Initial75 719 $2346633711
Variation-1 075 257 $-1-1-1-1-10
Final-999 538 $ (↓)22 (↓)45 (↓)62 (↓)2 (↓)6 (↓)11122537

Logo de Canucks de VancouverCanucks de Vancouver

DépartStatutSalaire retenuCap hit effectifFormationSPCListe de réserveChoix 1e rd2e et 3e rd4e à 7e rdPJGAPMBA%EFF
Pettersson, EliasCanucks de VancouverLNH-7 350 000 $011---44193554--
ArrivéeStatutSalaire retenuCap hit effectifFormationSPCListe de réserveChoix 1e rd2e et 3e rd4e à 7e rdPJGAPMBA%EFF
Iafallo, AlexKings de Los AngelesLNH-4 000 000 $011---2571017--
Turcotte, AlexExempté du ballottageKings de Los AngelesLNH-894 167 $011---0000--
Choix de 1e ronde en 2023 (Logo de Kings de Los AngelesLAK)---100------
Choix de 2e ronde en 2024 (Logo de Kings de Los AngelesLAK)---010------
VariationEspace sous le plafond salarialFormationSPCListe de réserveChoix 1e rd2e et 3e rd4e à 7e rdPJGAPMBA%EFF
Initial1 477 500 $2347693511
Variation2 455 833 $111110
Final3 933 333 $ (↑)24 (↑)48 (↑)70 (↑)4 (↑)6 (↑)11-12-25-37
22 janv. 2023 à 20 h 33
#1
mv21227
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2020
Messages: 10,979
Mentions "j'aime": 9,897
Not even close to enough for Pettersson, especially to a division rival. Start with Clarke + Byfield + 1st
22 janv. 2023 à 22 h 3
#2
Aasen6
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2021
Messages: 1,363
Mentions "j'aime": 594
You’re on glue if you think that gets Pettersson. For LA to get him ( being a division rival) it takes byfield, Clarke, one of kaliyev or turcotte, a ‘23 1st and probably a 24 1st.
22 janv. 2023 à 22 h 20
#3
Canucks1972
Canucks1972
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2017
Messages: 430
Mentions "j'aime": 68
Not even close. No thank you.
22 janv. 2023 à 22 h 35
#4
Dutchies
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2021
Messages: 6,656
Mentions "j'aime": 4,788
Canucks fans need to realize their franchise is in shambles. The management team from ownership down to the GM is disgusting. The treatment of Boudreau and the brutal management of contracts is despicable. It needs to be torn down. They have some great players, but no one is gonna want to play there with the **** show that's going on.

That being said, Pettersson will cost more than this, but players are gonna want out until a full ownership / management change is made.
Augustus et penguinswin a aimé ceci.
22 janv. 2023 à 22 h 51
#5
Augustus
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2022
Messages: 1,950
Mentions "j'aime": 909
Quoting: Dutchies
Canucks fans need to realize their franchise is in shambles. The management team from ownership down to the GM is disgusting. The treatment of Boudreau and the brutal management of contracts is despicable. It needs to be torn down. They have some great players, but no one is gonna want to play there with the **** show that's going on.

That being said, Pettersson will cost more than this, but players are gonna want out until a full ownership / management change is made.


The players saw exactly how the organization treated their coach, the "players' coach" that, at least publicly, they would "run through a brick wall" for. It's getting ugly.
Dutchies a aimé ceci.
22 janv. 2023 à 23 h 1
#6
Dutchies
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2021
Messages: 6,656
Mentions "j'aime": 4,788
Quoting: Augustus
The players saw exactly how the organization treated their coach, the "players' coach" that, at least publicly, they would "run through a brick wall" for. It's getting ugly.


yup, it's not gonna be pretty. Fans need to realize. Best thing is to sell the team and get new ownership in. Fire the GM and President. Clean sweep. Feel bad for the nicest coach in hockey.
23 janv. 2023 à 1 h 34
#7
Nighthawk
2018 Canucks
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2017
Messages: 2,186
Mentions "j'aime": 755
Ops is trolling & avoiding getting reported going in here & not as an ACGM.
23 janv. 2023 à 18 h 14
#8
Hitagi_Senpai
Canucks sorta homer
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2021
Messages: 1,896
Mentions "j'aime": 868
Gross under pay for Petey. He's the most valued asset on our roster, it's not even close either. If Petey were to be moved(IE say next season we know we're not resigning him as he doesn't want to stay) he's easily a 4 firsts value player. He just keeps getting better and better, as the team gets worse and worse. If and when Horvat is moved, he's the next captain if he stays .
23 janv. 2023 à 20 h 31
#9
penguinswin
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2021
Messages: 1,163
Mentions "j'aime": 386
This is an Eichel-level return….Pettersson is healthy so by necessity gets a higher return, as both are point/game players. Realistically, it is (1) Clarke or Byfield, (2) Turcotte or Kaliev or Vilardi, (3) 2023 first rounder, and (4) 2024 second that bumps to a first with Conf. final berth. Is this completely full value? No, of course not, but you never get full value in a trade when you are shipping out the best player. * If he was signed an extra couple of years the package would have been a little higher too
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage