SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

More Messy than Messier Drop trades in the comments

Créé par: bogdown
Équipe: 2022-23 Canucks de Vancouver
Date de création initiale: 19 janv. 2023
Publié: 19 janv. 2023
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
Since Rutherford and Allvin took to the helm, the Canucks have:
- Failed to clear cap space
- Failed to trade JT Miller
- Failed to acquire draft picks
- Signed a 29 year old winger until he’s 37
- Lowballed their captain who’s on pace for 50 to 60 goals
- Made the shortsighted Ilya Mikheyev signing
- Let go of their defensive systems coach for Mike Yeo and Trent Cull
- Owner accused of child abuse
- Human rights complaint filed against the organization
- A worse record than last year
- Wanting to sit Brock Boeser on Hockey Fights Cancer Night
- Taking away Jeff Paterson’s media credentials
- Covered up the misdiagnosis of Tanner Pearson and ruined his career
- Failed to retire Roberto Luongo’s number after his HOF induction
- GM cancelling season holders night the day before
- Ownership not letting management pull the trigger on a Bruce Boudreau firing without him knowing if he’s coached his last game

The real problem here is management. Rutherford is an absolute dinosaur tool looking for a Benning 2.0 retool. Ownership is corrupt, embarrassing, and too busy meddling in deals such as the Myers, Eriksson, and OEL deals.

This team is the worst of the worst. And it’s time to change the losing culture and commit to a full rebranding of everything.

The roster is broken down into the following

LW: Players that are untouchable, franchise pieces going forward
C: Players that shouldn’t be moved
RW: Players that don’t have a future on the Canucks
D: Players that can’t be moved

Drop your best trades in the comments
Rachats de contrats
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2023
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de NYR
Logo de VAN
2024
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
2025
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2882 500 000 $83 425 000 $1 250 000 $2 165 000 $-925 000 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
7 350 000 $7 350 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
950 000 $950 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
4 125 000 $4 125 000 $
C
UFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
4 750 000 $4 750 000 $
AG, AD
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
850 000 $850 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
1 800 000 $1 800 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
4 950 000 $4 950 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 4
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
AD, AG
RFA - 2
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
6 650 000 $6 650 000 $
AD
UFA - 3
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
7 850 000 $7 850 000 $
DG
UFA - 5
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
891 667 $891 667 $ (Bonis de performance300 000 $$300K)
AG, AD
RFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
825 000 $825 000 $
AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
855 833 $855 833 $
AD
RFA - 4
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
762 500 $762 500 $
C
UFA - 2
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
883 750 $883 750 $ (Bonis de performance82 500 $$82K)
C
RFA - 2
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
1 350 000 $1 350 000 $
DG
RFA - 2
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
850 000 $850 000 $
DG
UFA - 2
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
750 000 $750 000 $
C
UFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
883 750 $883 750 $ (Bonis de performance82 500 $$82K)
AD
RFA - 2
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
AD, C
UFA - 3
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
750 000 $750 000 $
AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
762 500 $762 500 $
AD, C
RFA - 2
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
750 000 $750 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
G
UFA - 4
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
5 250 000 $5 250 000 $
C, AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
7 260 000 $7 260 000 $
DG
NMC
UFA - 5
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
3 250 000 $3 250 000 $
AG
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
762 500 $762 500 $
G
UFA - 2
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
AG, AD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
2 500 000 $2 500 000 $
DD
UFA - 3

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
19 janv. 2023 à 14 h 21
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 3,629
Mentions "j'aime": 1,515
Wow, an honest assessment of the Canuck franchise, well done.
palhal a aimé ceci.
19 janv. 2023 à 14 h 21
#2
LongtimeLeafsufferer
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2015
Messages: 59,818
Mentions "j'aime": 22,839
I never understood all the love for Rutherford when he was hired. And as you suggest had authority in ALL personal decisions.
Kinda reminds of the disastrous situation when the Leafs anointed Brian "The Brain" Burke, who had full authority. Yeah he talked really good on TV, but didn't do any effort into his job as President or GM of the club.
The trouble (in any business), when poor hirings are made, the people who hired them don't want to fire them either. It makes the the "hiring party" seem incompetent.

I'll disagree with on Kuzmenko. He should be traded for the best return. No reason to think he would return to the Canucks next season.
delneggs a aimé ceci.
19 janv. 2023 à 14 h 23
#3
Démarrer sujet
Bog
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2022
Messages: 916
Mentions "j'aime": 335
Quoting: palhal
I never understood all the love for Rutherford when he was hired. And as you suggest had authority in ALL personal decisions.
Kinda reminds of the disastrous situation when the Leafs anointed Brian "The Brain" Burke, who had full authority. Yeah he talked really good on TV, but didn't do any effort into his job as President or GM of the club.
The trouble (in any business), when poor hirings are made, the people who hired them don't want to fire them either. It makes the the "hiring party" seem incompetent.

I'll disagree with on Kuzmenko. He should be traded for the best return. No reason to think he would return to the Canucks next season.


The problem with trading Kuzmenko is that he is producing at the same level as Panarin and Kaprizov did in his first season. If the Canucks are truly going to retool for next season, then why not keep the guy who is just entering his prime and could project to be the next ***** stud. Plus trading him would piss off Petey and probably make him leave.
19 janv. 2023 à 14 h 26
#4
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 3,629
Mentions "j'aime": 1,515
Quoting: palhal
I never understood all the love for Rutherford when he was hired. And as you suggest had authority in ALL personal decisions.
Kinda reminds of the disastrous situation when the Leafs anointed Brian "The Brain" Burke, who had full authority. Yeah he talked really good on TV, but didn't do any effort into his job as President or GM of the club.
The trouble (in any business), when poor hirings are made, the people who hired them don't want to fire them either. It makes the the "hiring party" seem incompetent.

I'll disagree with on Kuzmenko. He should be traded for the best return. No reason to think he would return to the Canucks next season.


IMO, the Canucks should get a new GM before they trade anyone. I know time is short, but Rutherford has lost it, and the way he handled the Miller non-trade and then signing, on top of Horvat now should be all the proof ownership needs to go in a new direction. Let a new GM come in, get a new coach and evaluate the options first. The team has a lot of very good, young players, so to just blow it up makes no sense to me, from the outside looking in anyway.
bogdown a aimé ceci.
19 janv. 2023 à 14 h 28
#5
LongtimeLeafsufferer
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2015
Messages: 59,818
Mentions "j'aime": 22,839
Quoting: bogdown
The problem with trading Kuzmenko is that he is producing at the same level as Panarin and Kaprizov did in his first season. If the Canucks are truly going to retool for next season, then why not keep the guy who is just entering his prime and could project to be the next ***** stud. Plus trading him would piss off Petey and probably make him leave.


Oh, I understood completely the want/need to keep Kuzmenko. But as you suggested, the Canucks are kinda of a disaster now and certainly in the near future. Kuzmenko has ZERO reasons to stay with the Canucks and good reasons to go to about 10 others teams that might want services, have better futures ...and have more cap.
Pettersson, unless he really wants the security of a long term contract, he just might want go the UFA route himself in a couple of years.
19 janv. 2023 à 14 h 35
#6
Démarrer sujet
Bog
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2022
Messages: 916
Mentions "j'aime": 335
Quoting: delneggs
IMO, the Canucks should get a new GM before they trade anyone. I know time is short, but Rutherford has lost it, and the way he handled the Miller non-trade and then signing, on top of Horvat now should be all the proof ownership needs to go in a new direction. Let a new GM come in, get a new coach and evaluate the options first. The team has a lot of very good, young players, so to just blow it up makes no sense to me, from the outside looking in anyway.


I mean sort of how the Rangers did with their rebuild. As much as I hated Gorton, he turned Nash into Miller, Lindgren, and Strome. He built around Kreider, Zibanejad, Fox, Panarin and Shesterkin. And Drury filled in the cracks with Goodrow, Trocheck, and Vesey.
19 janv. 2023 à 14 h 40
#7
alwaysnextyear
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2015
Messages: 5,529
Mentions "j'aime": 1,568
I lean toward trading Kuzmenko if they can get a great return for him, but I'm also in the camp that wants to build around Petey and Hughes long term, so if extending Kuz makes it more likely that Petey wants to stay then I'm all for it. I imagine Petey will want to know there's some kind of plan in place to build a winner while he's still in his prime.

Literally everyone else should be available, and Horvat/Schenn should definitely be traded on or before the deadline.
19 janv. 2023 à 14 h 49
#8
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 3,629
Mentions "j'aime": 1,515
Quoting: bogdown
I mean sort of how the Rangers did with their rebuild. As much as I hated Gorton, he turned Nash into Miller, Lindgren, and Strome. He built around Kreider, Zibanejad, Fox, Panarin and Shesterkin. And Drury filled in the cracks with Goodrow, Trocheck, and Vesey.


Yeah, sort of, but I don't think the Canucks need to tear it all the way down like the Rangers did. IMO, getting rid of Miller is the key, plus signing Horvat and Kuz. It may be painful to get another team to take Miller's contract, but you remove the cancer in your room. IMO anyway. Once you get out from under his contract, they can address the D issues.
19 janv. 2023 à 15 h 11
#9
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2017
Messages: 27,908
Mentions "j'aime": 14,586
I hope it helped getting that off your chest.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage