Modifié 16 janv. 2023 à 14 h 37
Quoting: DongLord23
Where? It's literally only Kings fans. Are you delusional lmao?
It's 2 of the biggest homer king fans on this site and another fan saying "I personally wouldn't give up a 1st for him" lol. What does that prove? It's funny how hard you are trying. Thanks for the laughs.
He's not worth a 1st for anyone that isn't completely biased.
someone should really teach you the weight of how contracts work, though. like, genuinely.
your only two compared players were gustafson and deangelo, which were horrible to compare durzi to because of their circumstances.
then you stupidly said “i guess if timmins gets 50 points he’ll be worth a kings ransom”. you are a clown man. you are lost in your own little toronto fantasy world where you are in an echo chamber.
I can’t wait for ghost to receive a first at the TDL.
I'm tired of running in circles with you, so I'll break it down one final time. After that. I'm done responding.
Maybe this way, it'll help you moving forward.
GM's don't value big players like YOU think they do. If you're a serviceable defenseman and can play in the top 4, regardless "uhh he big and eat minutes. small player get point not big price"
Your caveman brain needs to start clicking and you need to stop watching Cherry's podcast.
No, DeAngelo wasn't worth a 1st. He's a complete headcase who cant control his own emotions in the playoffs. Nobody wants that when its like the one thing that matters in the playoffs; being poised.
No, Gustafson was not worth a 1st. He had one good season, then sloped the next season, and was a complete and utter waste in his own end. Durzi, in that regard, is at least somewhat competent. I don't know what YOUVE been watching this season, but he's actually been playing pretty good the past 2 months.
Gustafson was also 27
If we want to expand our compared players and look at forwards, young players like Hagel will get two 1sts, despite not anyone's idea of "top players".
You want to know why? Because of contracts. I genuinely don't know why you REFUSE to grasp how contracts are valued among the league.
If a defenseman is 24, producing at a good pace, locked under a sub 2m cap hit for the next 2 seasons AND an expiring RFA,
that entire circumstance is worth a 1st MINIMUM. Seriously consider that and let it sit in your head for a couple of minutes.
No, Timmins is not worth a first right now because of a small sample size and his injury history. With a 50 point season, yeah, most likely.
You are lost, man. Absolutely lost.