SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Next year

Créé par: Patrickkane
Équipe: 2023-24 Ducks d'Anaheim
Date de création initiale: 8 janv. 2023
Publié: 8 janv. 2023
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
1925 000 $
2950 000 $
87 500 000 $
87 500 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
43 500 000 $
21 500 000 $
22 500 000 $
25 000 000 $
22 000 000 $
Transactions
1.
VAN
  1. Comtois, Maxime [Droits de RFA]
  2. Silfverberg, Jakob
  3. Choix de 2e ronde en 2023 (BOS)
  4. Choix de 4e ronde en 2024 (ANA)
2.
ANA
  1. Myers, Philippe
  2. Choix de 4e ronde en 2023 (TBL)
  3. Choix de 2e ronde en 2025 (TBL)
Détails additionnels:
Return for Klingberg
TBL
Rachats de contrats
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2023
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de COL
Logo de ANA
Logo de MIN
Logo de ANA
Logo de TBL
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
2024
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de BOS
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
2025
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de TBL
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2383 500 000 $69 302 084 $0 $2 582 500 $14 197 916 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
1 456 250 $1 456 250 $
AG, C
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
7 500 000 $7 500 000 $
C, AG
RFA - 3
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
6 650 000 $6 650 000 $
AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
894 167 $894 167 $ (Bonis de performance2 500 000 $$2M)
C, AG
RFA - 2
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
AD, C
UFA - 4
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
7 500 000 $7 500 000 $
AD
UFA - 7
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
1 800 000 $1 800 000 $
C, AG
RFA - 1
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
C, AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
3 650 000 $3 650 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
425 000 $425 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 1
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
6 500 000 $6 500 000 $
DG/DD
M-NTC
UFA - 3
2 500 000 $2 500 000 $
DD
UFA - 3
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
6 400 000 $6 400 000 $
G
M-NTC
UFA - 4
3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
DG
UFA - 6
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
925 000 $925 000 $
DD
RFA - 3
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
950 000 $950 000 $
G
RFA - 2
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
844 167 $844 167 $ (Bonis de performance82 500 $$82K)
DG
RFA - 3
Logo de Lightning de Tampa Bay
1 400 000 $1 400 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
1 295 000 $1 295 000 $
AG, AD
RFA - 1
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
762 500 $762 500 $
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
850 000 $850 000 $
DG/DD
RFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
8 janv. 2023 à 15 h 19
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2020
Messages: 10,385
Mentions "j'aime": 9,535
Part of the reason the Canucks would move Boeser is to free up cap space. This trade doesn’t do that
remowilliams et majormoose007 a aimé ceci.
8 janv. 2023 à 15 h 21
#2
Démarrer sujet
Patrickkanefanatic
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2022
Messages: 258
Mentions "j'aime": 47
Quoting: mv21227
Part of the reason the Canucks would move Boeser is to free up cap space. This trade doesn’t do that


If they buyout Silfverberg they do.
8 janv. 2023 à 15 h 25
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2020
Messages: 10,385
Mentions "j'aime": 9,535
Quoting: Patrickkane
If they buyout Silfverberg they do.


But that just adds dead cap for an additional season after next. Still doesn’t make sense for them
majormoose007 a aimé ceci.
8 janv. 2023 à 15 h 39
#4
Future Norris guy
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2022
Messages: 15,605
Mentions "j'aime": 8,625
Vancouver passes, Doesn't save them any money.

Plus Brock Boeser at full value, Doesn't return anywhere close to that kind of value.
majormoose007 a aimé ceci.
8 janv. 2023 à 15 h 46
#5
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2022
Messages: 2,874
Mentions "j'aime": 1,040
TB doesn't have the cap space to do that at the deadline
8 janv. 2023 à 16 h 40
#6
Future Ducks legend
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2022
Messages: 10,263
Mentions "j'aime": 7,059
The Vancouver trade makes zero sense for either team involved.

Defense signings are two guys I would like to have but both probably cost more in AAV. I don't think Monahan is the guy, we need wingers, specifically on the left side, which I see he can play.

Convince me that Nieto and Blueger are necessary pieces when we have kids to give ice time to.

Jesus, a 25 2nd and a 23 4th for retaining 3.5 mil, that's a rather ****e return given the main pick is three drafts from now.
majormoose007 a aimé ceci.
8 janv. 2023 à 17 h 3
#7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2021
Messages: 15,970
Mentions "j'aime": 12,299
Trades ain’t it

I’d like the Graves deal while not really any of the other UFA signings — maybe Schenn

I’d love both the Zegras and Terry deals but what is that Drysdale contract?
8 janv. 2023 à 18 h 19
#8
Démarrer sujet
Patrickkanefanatic
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2022
Messages: 258
Mentions "j'aime": 47
Quoting: GiggywithGibby


Jesus, a 25 2nd and a 23 4th for retaining 3.5 mil, that's a rather ****e return given the main pick is three drafts from now.


You have to retain 3.5M because you overpaid the guy by 2M LOL. You think your getting anything for Klingberg without retaining? Seems like Ducks fans though they were getting a free 1st for signing Klingberg and now can't accept the reality that hes just not worth that. If GMs thought he was worth a 1st or a blue chip prospect dont you think he wouldve gotten one of those deals that Reilly, Parayko, Lindholm etc got last year?
8 janv. 2023 à 20 h 21
#9
Future Ducks legend
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2022
Messages: 10,263
Mentions "j'aime": 7,059
Quoting: Patrickkane
You have to retain 3.5M because you overpaid the guy by 2M LOL. You think your getting anything for Klingberg without retaining? Seems like Ducks fans though they were getting a free 1st for signing Klingberg and now can't accept the reality that hes just not worth that. If GMs thought he was worth a 1st or a blue chip prospect dont you think he wouldve gotten one of those deals that Reilly, Parayko, Lindholm etc got last year?


The complaint is that it's a 2nd THREE DRAFTS from now. We will be entering our contention window when we draft whoever we get for that pick. Yeah, we may not get a 1st for Kling at this point, we recognize that, but if we're getting a 2nd it's going to be this year, not in 2025.
8 janv. 2023 à 20 h 37
#10
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2017
Messages: 50
Mentions "j'aime": 13
Modifié 8 janv. 2023 à 21 h 41
Quoting: Patrickkane
You have to retain 3.5M because you overpaid the guy by 2M LOL. You think your getting anything for Klingberg without retaining? Seems like Ducks fans though they were getting a free 1st for signing Klingberg and now can't accept the reality that hes just not worth that. If GMs thought he was worth a 1st or a blue chip prospect dont you think he wouldve gotten one of those deals that Reilly, Parayko, Lindholm etc got last year?


No one in Ducks world cares about the actual action of retaining on Klingberg. If the team is going to trade him with that as a consideration though it's going to be better than a 4th and a 2nd three years from now.

No one is just going to take a trash return just to get rid of him. That's ridiculous
GiggywithGibby a aimé ceci.
8 janv. 2023 à 21 h 31
#11
Démarrer sujet
Patrickkanefanatic
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2022
Messages: 258
Mentions "j'aime": 47
Quoting: GiggywithGibby
The complaint is that it's a 2nd THREE DRAFTS from now. We will be entering our contention window when we draft whoever we get for that pick. Yeah, we may not get a 1st for Kling at this point, we recognize that, but if we're getting a 2nd it's going to be this year, not in 2025.


The only teams I see being interested in him are Tampa and Washington. Hard to get what you want when you have no leverage as no other playoff teams have a need for him.
8 janv. 2023 à 21 h 41
#12
Démarrer sujet
Patrickkanefanatic
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2022
Messages: 258
Mentions "j'aime": 47
Quoting: Jakam1138
No one in Ducks world cares about the actual action of retaining on Klingberg. If the team is going to trade him with that as a consideration though it's going to be better than a 4th and a 2nd three years from now.

No one is just going to take a trash return just to get rid of him. That's rediculous


Good luck getting sum better
9 janv. 2023 à 0 h 6
#13
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2017
Messages: 50
Mentions "j'aime": 13
Quoting: Patrickkane
Good luck getting sum better


Bare minimum someone will offer a second this year.

No one's expecting a Brandon Hagel return but a 2022 second and a decent prospect isn't out of reach
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage