SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Flyers Opening Night

Créé par: NateElder12
Équipe: 2017-18 Flyers de Philadelphie
Date de création initiale: 5 juin 2017
Publié: 5 juin 2017
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
54 500 000 $
2975 000 $
2975 000 $
2815 000 $
21 000 000 $
2875 000 $
21 250 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
23 000 000 $
Patrick, Nolan
3925 000 $
Transactions
PHI
VGK
  1. Weise, Dale
Détails additionnels:
Jordan Weal
Rachats de contrats
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2017
Logo de PHI
Logo de PHI
Logo de PHI
Logo de BOS
Logo de PHI
Logo de NYI
Logo de TBL
Logo de PHI
Logo de PHI
Logo de PHI
Logo de LAK
2018
Logo de PHI
Logo de PHI
Logo de PHI
Logo de PHI
Logo de PHI
Logo de PHI
Logo de PHI
2019
Logo de PHI
Logo de PHI
Logo de PHI
Logo de PHI
Logo de PHI
Logo de PHI
Logo de PHI
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2373 000 000 $66 724 167 $1 062 500 $1 775 000 $6 275 833 $

Formation

Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
2 350 000 $2 350 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2
4 137 500 $4 137 500 $
AD, C
NMC
UFA - 5
8 250 000 $8 250 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 7
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance212 500 $$212K)
AG
UFA - 3
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
C, AG
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 1
3 975 000 $3 975 000 $
AD, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 2
894 167 $894 167 $ (Bonis de performance212 500 $$212K)
AD, AG
UFA - 2
4 333 333 $4 333 333 $
C
UFA - 5
5 125 000 $5 125 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 3
1 450 000 $1 450 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 2
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 2
1 250 000 $1 250 000 $
AG, C
UFA - 2
875 000 $875 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 2
3 625 000 $3 625 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
894 167 $894 167 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
DG
UFA - 2
2 345 000 $2 345 000 $
DD
UFA - 3
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
G
UFA - 2
863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance500 000 $$500K)
DG, AG
UFA - 1
4 500 000 $4 500 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 6
2 500 000 $2 500 000 $
G
UFA - 2
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
DD
UFA - 3
894 167 $894 167 $
DG
UFA - 1
975 000 $975 000 $
DG
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
5 juin 2017 à 15 h 48
#1
get ur corsi up
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2017
Messages: 5,953
Mentions "j'aime": 1,558
Nilsson idea is interesting.
5 juin 2017 à 15 h 56
#2
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2017
Messages: 10,392
Mentions "j'aime": 2,885
Raffl isnt a top 9 forward, he should be a HS, but Hackstol might throw him in. Same with MacDonald, he isnt a starter, Manning should be in there instead.

also, peep the "Ginormous Trades" thread.
5 juin 2017 à 16 h 15
#3
Démarrer sujet
NateElder12
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2016
Messages: 5,736
Mentions "j'aime": 801
Modifié 5 juin 2017 à 16 h 25
Quoting: phillyjabroni
Raffl isnt a top 9 forward, he should be a HS, but Hackstol might throw him in. Same with MacDonald, he isnt a starter, Manning should be in there instead.

also, peep the "Ginormous Trades" thread.


Yeah I know he isn't and no **** lol but this is what we will probably see. If you want me to post what I want I'd be glad to, but I'm about 95% sure this is what we see next year. Sorry I didn't add Landy/Galchenyuk. i know that would have got me an automatic 5 stars since those are the two best players in the league according to you.
5 juin 2017 à 16 h 43
#4
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2017
Messages: 10,392
Mentions "j'aime": 2,885
Quoting: NateElder12
Quoting: phillyjabroni
Raffl isnt a top 9 forward, he should be a HS, but Hackstol might throw him in. Same with MacDonald, he isnt a starter, Manning should be in there instead.

also, peep the "Ginormous Trades" thread.


Yeah I know he isn't and no **** lol but this is what we will probably see. If you want me to post what I want I'd be glad to, but I'm about 95% sure this is what we see next year. Sorry I didn't add Landy/Galchenyuk. i know that would have got me an automatic 5 stars since those are the two best players in the league according to you.



thats just false. All of my trades that I would do for Landeskog is basically Brayden Schenn ; Robert Hagg for him. Galchenyuk is a stud, these are hypothetical deals that trade Giroux. Giroux is going to be our captain for years to come.
5 juin 2017 à 17 h 18
#5
Démarrer sujet
NateElder12
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2016
Messages: 5,736
Mentions "j'aime": 801
Quoting: phillyjabroni
Quoting: NateElder12


Yeah I know he isn't and no **** lol but this is what we will probably see. If you want me to post what I want I'd be glad to, but I'm about 95% sure this is what we see next year. Sorry I didn't add Landy/Galchenyuk. i know that would have got me an automatic 5 stars since those are the two best players in the league according to you.



thats just false. All of my trades that I would do for Landeskog is basically Brayden Schenn ; Robert Hagg for him. Galchenyuk is a stud, these are hypothetical deals that trade Giroux. Giroux is going to be our captain for years to come.


Galchenyuk will be lucky if he ever turns into what G was in his prime. And yes I understand you always try to trade Schenn/Hagg for Landy but Landy isn't good. Landy's stats are inflated from the early potion of his career and in the last two years or so him and Schenn are pbasically equal at 5v5 - which is what you always claim is important to you. If that's the case how are you ignoring that Schenn outscored Landy at 5v5 this past season and trailed him by 1 point the prior season. All this while placing himself in the same category as Kucherov/Ovi on the powerplay. You hate Schenn because you don't think he's good at 5v5 and that is wrong. What Schenn isn't great at 5v5 is playing defense and even then he still finished with a 49.3 CF% which is basically even. He can score in many different situations and shockingly his game is still developing even though he is 25. Why would we give up a dynamic scorer for basically Sean Couturier but a winger? Then you always add a prospect and picks and think you are making a great deal but it makes the team worse. Then if someone comments on it you get all defensive and try to say I'm stupid or others are stupid like you're doing now.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage