SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Add lw

Créé par: Bostonbruins
Équipe: 2022-23 Flames de Calgary
Date de création initiale: 18 déc. 2022
Publié: 18 déc. 2022
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Transactions
BUF
  1. Tanev, Christopher
  2. Choix de 2e ronde en 2023 (CGY)
Enfoui
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2023
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
2024
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
2025
Logo de FLA
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2482 500 000 $77 762 500 $0 $200 000 $4 737 500 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
4 750 000 $4 750 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Flames de Calgary
4 850 000 $4 850 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Flames de Calgary
2 125 000 $2 125 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Flames de Calgary
2 300 000 $2 300 000 $
AG, AD, C
RFA - 2
Logo de Flames de Calgary
7 000 000 $7 000 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 7
Logo de Flames de Calgary
5 800 000 $5 800 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 3
Logo de Flames de Calgary
762 500 $762 500 $
AG, C
UFA - 2
Logo de Flames de Calgary
5 350 000 $5 350 000 $
C
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Flames de Calgary
4 900 000 $4 900 000 $
AD, AG
NTC
UFA - 5
Logo de Flames de Calgary
5 250 000 $5 250 000 $
AG, AD
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
800 000 $800 000 $ (Bonis de performance200 000 $$200K)
AD, C
UFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
5 900 000 $5 900 000 $
AG, AD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
750 000 $750 000 $
AD, C
UFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
750 000 $750 000 $
AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
750 000 $750 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Flames de Calgary
1 237 500 $1 237 500 $
DG
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Flames de Calgary
4 550 000 $4 550 000 $
DD
UFA - 4
Logo de Flames de Calgary
6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
G
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo de Flames de Calgary
3 750 000 $3 750 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 2
Logo de Flames de Calgary
750 000 $750 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
750 000 $750 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
1 850 000 $1 850 000 $
DG/DD
RFA - 2
Logo de Flames de Calgary
3 250 000 $3 250 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
912 500 $912 500 $
DG
UFA - 1
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Flames de Calgary
2 500 000 $2 500 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 2

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
18 déc. 2022 à 15 h 54
#1
Shibbal18
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2016
Messages: 25,252
Mentions "j'aime": 9,041
Sabres pass
18 déc. 2022 à 16 h 8
#2
GO FLAMES GO
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2020
Messages: 18,350
Mentions "j'aime": 10,680
Trading Tanev is a horrible idea. Have you seen how ****ty we have played without him?
Bostonbruins et gretzkyghosts a aimé ceci.
18 déc. 2022 à 16 h 34
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2018
Messages: 5,352
Mentions "j'aime": 4,799
Modifié 18 déc. 2022 à 17 h 6
Quoting: Gmonwy
Trading Tanev is a horrible idea. Have you seen how ****ty we have played without him?
Chris would help the Sabre's beleaguered PK and balance the defensive line up.
I can understand why Calgary fans would say no, while Tanev is signed for only two years (same as Olofsson and nearly the same cap hit) and is 32 YO, it is incomprehensible why a Sabre fan would say no.
18 déc. 2022 à 16 h 57
#4
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2017
Messages: 27,891
Mentions "j'aime": 14,577
Unless a righty can play on the left for buffalo, we are all set and can deny
Shibbal18 a aimé ceci.
18 déc. 2022 à 17 h 43
#5
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2021
Messages: 2,210
Mentions "j'aime": 1,669
Buffalo accept
Bostonbruins a aimé ceci.
18 déc. 2022 à 17 h 46
#6
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2021
Messages: 2,210
Mentions "j'aime": 1,669
Quoting: Shibbal18
Sabres pass


Wait what? Top 4 RD + 2nd for VO and Bryson? Easy yes. We need improve D and Olofsson does little for us, he will anyway leave at TDL or summer.
Bostonbruins a aimé ceci.
18 déc. 2022 à 18 h 7
#7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2017
Messages: 8,273
Mentions "j'aime": 6,247
Quoting: Shibbal18
Sabres pass


I like olofsson more than most, I'd do this trade though. At this point, Bryson is worth very little, so it's olofsson for a 2nd plus a top 4 defensive defender who is under contract for an additional year. This isn't some derp trade where olofsson gets moved for a cup of warm piss.
Bostonbruins et gretzkyghosts a aimé ceci.
18 déc. 2022 à 20 h 27
#8
Shibbal18
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2016
Messages: 25,252
Mentions "j'aime": 9,041
Quoting: sabres89
I like olofsson more than most, I'd do this trade though. At this point, Bryson is worth very little, so it's olofsson for a 2nd plus a top 4 defensive defender who is under contract for an additional year. This isn't some derp trade where olofsson gets moved for a cup of warm piss.


Quoting: Fjordy
Wait what? Top 4 RD + 2nd for VO and Bryson? Easy yes. We need improve D and Olofsson does little for us, he will anyway leave at TDL or summer.


Then do Mittlestadt 1 for 1. He was playing LW any way, not Olofsson. Unless Tanev plays LD as well, that leaves them with Pilut and Clague and Lybushkin on the bench when they're at full health. I'd rather trade pieces that don't fit for pieces that do, instead of visa versa. Nobody can step in and replace Olofsson's production, especially when the problem with the 3rd line isn't addressed.
sabres89 a aimé ceci.
18 déc. 2022 à 20 h 30
#9
Shibbal18
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2016
Messages: 25,252
Mentions "j'aime": 9,041
Quoting: Fjordy
Wait what? Top 4 RD + 2nd for VO and Bryson? Easy yes. We need improve D and Olofsson does little for us, he will anyway leave at TDL or summer.


Olofsson is here until the end of next season. He's also one of 6 players with 10+ goals so he does a lot more than nothing. He's far from the problem that you keep trying to make him.
sabres89 a aimé ceci.
18 déc. 2022 à 20 h 36
#10
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2017
Messages: 8,273
Mentions "j'aime": 6,247
Quoting: Shibbal18
Then do Mittlestadt 1 for 1. He was playing LW any way, not Olofsson. Unless Tanev plays LD as well, that leaves them with Pilut and Clague and Lybushkin on the bench when they're at full health. I'd rather trade pieces that don't fit for pieces that do, instead of visa versa. Nobody can step in and replace Olofsson's production, especially when the problem with the 3rd line isn't addressed.


Oh, I'd drive Casey to the airport myself. Was thinking lybushkin could be moved for something decent. Nobody ever says 'we've gotta get softer for the playoffs'. I am of course all for swapping olofsson with mittelstadt.
Shibbal18 et Bostonbruins a aimé ceci.
19 déc. 2022 à 2 h 22
#11
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2021
Messages: 2,210
Mentions "j'aime": 1,669
Quoting: Shibbal18
Olofsson is here until the end of next season. He's also one of 6 players with 10+ goals so he does a lot more than nothing. He's far from the problem that you keep trying to make him.


I think Adams will trade him before Olofsson gone in UFA. Olofsson's metrics are still bad and some of his goals are in empty nets and at PP, he doesn't do much at ES. But this trade is beneficial for Buffalo, we need the top 4 RD more than Olofsson or Mittelstadt, we have no problem scoring goals or on PP. Olofsson is not a key player in the team, who also has a lot of disadvantages in his game.
Bostonbruins a aimé ceci.
19 déc. 2022 à 4 h 7
#12
Shibbal18
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2016
Messages: 25,252
Mentions "j'aime": 9,041
Quoting: Fjordy
I think Adams will trade him before Olofsson gone in UFA. Olofsson's metrics are still bad and some of his goals are in empty nets and at PP, he doesn't do much at ES. But this trade is beneficial for Buffalo, we need the top 4 RD more than Olofsson or Mittelstadt, we have no problem scoring goals or on PP. Olofsson is not a key player in the team, who also has a lot of disadvantages in his game.


These arguements are very very tired and outdated, he has 3 empty netter's, same as Tuch, 2 came in one game and he hasn't had an EN goal since November 2nd. He has 3 PPGs and 5 PPPs. So that's 10 5 v 5 goals (77%) of which 3 are EN and 2 are GWG. In the Granato years he has 38 goals 42 assists of which 11 are ppg (29%) 22 ppp (28%) in 131 games (.61 ppg) while averaging 15:45 ice time and only 6 of the 38 we're EN. He's severely underrated by people who cling to 5 year old tropes that are not even remotely accurate anymore, because of some weird bias. He's also stuck with a black hole in Mittlestadt who makes everyone on the team worse and currently has 2 5v5 goals 17 points, 10 of which are from the PP (59%), which is way more of a PP specialist than Olofsson. Olofsson defensive play isn't even as bad as everyone tries to make it out to be, and would be/has been better with out Mittlestadt who is the analytically the worst defensive forward on the team. Olofsson is by far not a problem and adds 5v5 points (currently 13pts - 72%) to the leagues best offense, seems pretty key and most named disadvantages are imaginary
19 déc. 2022 à 5 h 0
#13
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2021
Messages: 2,210
Mentions "j'aime": 1,669
Quoting: Shibbal18
These arguements are very very tired and outdated, he has 3 empty netter's, same as Tuch, 2 came in one game and he hasn't had an EN goal since November 2nd. He has 3 PPGs and 5 PPPs. So that's 10 5 v 5 goals (77%) of which 3 are EN and 2 are GWG. In the Granato years he has 38 goals 42 assists of which 11 are ppg (29%) 22 ppp (28%) in 131 games (.61 ppg) while averaging 15:45 ice time and only 6 of the 38 we're EN. He's severely underrated by people who cling to 5 year old tropes that are not even remotely accurate anymore, because of some weird bias. He's also stuck with a black hole in Mittlestadt who makes everyone on the team worse and currently has 2 5v5 goals 17 points, 10 of which are from the PP (59%), which is way more of a PP specialist than Olofsson. Olofsson defensive play isn't even as bad as everyone tries to make it out to be, and would be/has been better with out Mittlestadt who is the analytically the worst defensive forward on the team. Olofsson is by far not a problem and adds 5v5 points (currently 13pts - 72%) to the leagues best offense, seems pretty key and most named disadvantages are imaginary

I didn't see Olofsson's great performance without Mitts when Skinner was suspended and Mitts was on the first line. So I trade any of them, and preferably both, to improve our defense. Also I would replace one of them with a more physical player.
Bostonbruins a aimé ceci.
19 déc. 2022 à 9 h 23
#14
Shibbal18
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2016
Messages: 25,252
Mentions "j'aime": 9,041
Modifié 19 déc. 2022 à 9 h 38
Quoting: Fjordy
I didn't see Olofsson's great performance without Mitts when Skinner was suspended and Mitts was on the first line. So I trade any of them, and preferably both, to improve our defense. Also I would replace one of them with a more physical player.


Mitts was on the 1st line and that line disappeared, 5v5 they were -2 with 0 goals for. Olofsson had 3 points, Jost had 2, Krebs had 2, and Asplund had 2, in those 3 games. You have to be wearing literal blinders to not see it.
19 déc. 2022 à 11 h 26
#15
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2021
Messages: 2,210
Mentions "j'aime": 1,669
Quoting: Shibbal18
Mitts was on the 1st line and that line disappeared, 5v5 they were -2 with 0 goals for. Olofsson had 3 points, Jost had 2, Krebs had 2, and Asplund had 2, in those 3 games. You have to be wearing literal blinders to not see it.


No, I don't wear blinders, I say what I see, they both sucks and there is no place for them in this team in the near future. The vision test and metrics show it, that's all.
19 déc. 2022 à 17 h 13
#16
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2018
Messages: 338
Mentions "j'aime": 78
Modifié 19 déc. 2022 à 17 h 35
Quoting: Shibbal18
Mitts was on the 1st line and that line disappeared, 5v5 they were -2 with 0 goals for. Olofsson had 3 points, Jost had 2, Krebs had 2, and Asplund had 2, in those 3 games. You have to be wearing literal blinders to not see it.
@Fjordy
Blinders?
No one is saying Mittelstadt is great. but Tuch-Thompson-Mittelstadt line produced 5 goals in those three games.
What were you watching?
gretzkyghosts a aimé ceci.
19 déc. 2022 à 17 h 20
#17
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2021
Messages: 2,210
Mentions "j'aime": 1,669
Quoting: Bostonbruins
Fjordy
Blinders?
Tuch-Thompson-Mittelstadt line produced 5 goals in those three games.
What were you watching?

When Skinner played there, they scored even more. Thompson is very good, you can put any pylon on this line and it will still produce. Mittelstadt and Olofsson are probably our two worst forwards, even Krebs has been looking better lately. I would get rid of Mitts and Olofsson at TDL or in summer.
Shibbal18 a aimé ceci.
19 déc. 2022 à 17 h 36
#18
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2018
Messages: 338
Mentions "j'aime": 78
Quoting: Fjordy
When Skinner played there, they scored even more. Thompson is very good, you can put any pylon on this line and it will still produce. Mittelstadt and Olofsson are probably our two worst forwards, even Krebs has been looking better lately. I would get rid of Mitts and Olofsson at TDL or in summer.
I was not making a case that Mittelstadt is any good, only that Shibbal had his facts wrong.
I added to my post, but you quoted it before I could make my edit.
Skinner-Thompso-Tuch could be the best line in the NHL.
Mittelstadt is not a top line player.

EDIT more than 5 goals in three games from Thompson and Tuch?
Neither Olofsson not Mittelstadt have a future on this team.
No doubt, ONLY that Shibbal had his facts wrong.
gretzkyghosts a aimé ceci.
19 déc. 2022 à 18 h 39
#19
Shibbal18
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2016
Messages: 25,252
Mentions "j'aime": 9,041
Modifié 19 déc. 2022 à 18 h 47
Quoting: Bostonbruins
Fjordy
Blinders?
No one is saying Mittelstadt is great. but Tuch-Thompson-Mittelstadt line produced 5 goals in those three games.
What were you watching?


Thompson and Tuch did on the PP and away from Mittlestadt, not that line. Mittelstadt had 1 assist where he did nothing again, on the 1 5v5 points that line had in those 3 games, that was his only point in the last 4 games. Skinner had 3 points in his first game back. What were you watching?
19 déc. 2022 à 18 h 50
#20
Shibbal18
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2016
Messages: 25,252
Mentions "j'aime": 9,041
Modifié 19 déc. 2022 à 19 h 3
Quoting: Bostonbruins
I was not making a case that Mittelstadt is any good, only that Shibbal had his facts wrong.
I added to my post, but you quoted it before I could make my edit.
Skinner-Thompso-Tuch could be the best line in the NHL.
Mittelstadt is not a top line player.

EDIT more than 5 goals in three games from Thompson and Tuch?
Neither Olofsson not Mittelstadt have a future on this team.
No doubt, ONLY that Shibbal had his facts wrong.


All of the data is readily available. You sound like a gretzkyghosts burner account. You want to make the claim I have my facts wrong but then presented with the numbers you hide?
19 déc. 2022 à 19 h 40
#21
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2018
Messages: 338
Mentions "j'aime": 78
Quoting: Shibbal18
All of the data is readily available. You sound like a gretzkyghosts burner account. You want to make the claim I have my facts wrong but then presented with the numbers you hide?
LOL, you are paranoid but you also provide false information.
Tuch and Thompson combined for 5 goals in the three games, among the three games they were +1 not -2.
I would never presume Casey is a top line player, but your facts are wrong.
19 déc. 2022 à 20 h 3
#22
Shibbal18
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2016
Messages: 25,252
Mentions "j'aime": 9,041
Quoting: Bostonbruins
LOL, you are paranoid but you also provide false information.
Tuch and Thompson combined for 5 goals in the three games, among the three games they were +1 not -2.
I would never presume Casey is a top line player, but your facts are wrong.


Tuch had 3 PP points and 0 even strength points, Thompson had 1 5v5 goal and 4 PP points, Mittlestadt had 1 5v5 assist 0 power play points. On Thompson's 5v5 goal Quinn was on the ice, not Tuch. As I said:
Quoting: Shibbal18
5v5 they were -2 with 0 goals for.
Mittlestadt-sucks.jpg
So please explain how it is false? Thompson and Tuch we're +1 but Mittlestadt Thompson Tuch wasn't. If you have any more questions please feel free to ask them or just actually look at the data before saying someone else is wrong because they don't immediately bow to your opinion and actually challenge you
19 déc. 2022 à 20 h 48
#23
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2018
Messages: 338
Mentions "j'aime": 78
Quoting: Shibbal18
Tuch had 3 PP points and 0 even strength points, Thompson had 1 5v5 goal and 4 PP points, Mittlestadt had 1 5v5 assist 0 power play points. On Thompson's 5v5 goal Quinn was on the ice, not Tuch. As I said: Mittlestadt-sucks.jpg
So please explain how it is false? Thompson and Tuch we're +1 but Mittlestadt Thompson Tuch wasn't. If you have any more questions please feel free to ask them or just actually look at the data before saying someone else is wrong because they don't immediately bow to your opinion and actually challenge you
https://www.hockey-reference.com/boxscores/202212150COL.html
16 Tage Thompson 1 1 2 2 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 2 50.0 27 22:50
17 Alex Tuch 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 5 20.0 26 21:16
https://www.hockey-reference.com/boxscores/202212130BUF.html
17 Tage Thompson 2 1 3 0 0 0 2 0 1 0 1 0 5 40.0 20 19:29
18 Alex Tuch 1 1 2 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 4 25.0 20 19:58
https://www.hockey-reference.com/boxscores/202212100PIT.html
17 Tage Thompson 0 0 0 -1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 0.0 24 20:05
18 Alex Tuch 0 0 0 -1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0.0 25 20:06

You can add them up.

No one is saying Mittelstadt is a top line player.
he is not part of the future.
those are for the season.
You will never give up.
19 déc. 2022 à 21 h 15
#24
Shibbal18
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2016
Messages: 25,252
Mentions "j'aime": 9,041
Quoting: Bostonbruins
https://www.hockey-reference.com/boxscores/202212150COL.html
16 Tage Thompson 1 1 2 2 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 2 50.0 27 22:50
17 Alex Tuch 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 5 20.0 26 21:16
https://www.hockey-reference.com/boxscores/202212130BUF.html
17 Tage Thompson 2 1 3 0 0 0 2 0 1 0 1 0 5 40.0 20 19:29
18 Alex Tuch 1 1 2 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 4 25.0 20 19:58
https://www.hockey-reference.com/boxscores/202212100PIT.html
17 Tage Thompson 0 0 0 -1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 0.0 24 20:05
18 Alex Tuch 0 0 0 -1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0.0 25 20:06

You can add them up.

No one is saying Mittelstadt is a top line player.
he is not part of the future.
those are for the season.
You will never give up.


You're proving my point. I've told you multiple times Thompson and Tuch had those points on the powerplay, go look at the pages you just posted. This entire conversation is how Mittlestadt brings Tuch and Thompson down. Their line at even strength was 0 goals -2. Even strength does not include power play time, no matter how many times you try to add it in.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage