SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Two way adds for leafs

Créé par: jazzhandz321
Équipe: 2022-23 Maple Leafs de Toronto
Date de création initiale: 10 déc. 2022
Publié: 10 déc. 2022
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
CRÉÉANSCAP HIT
Puljujarvi, Jesse
11 500 000 $
Transactions
1.
TOR
  1. Jensen, Nick (1 250 000 $ retained)
WSH
  1. Abruzzese, Nick
  2. Choix de 2e ronde en 2024 (TOR)
  3. Choix de 3e ronde en 2025 (TOR)
2.
TOR
  1. Henrique, Adam (2 912 500 $ retained)
ANA
  1. Villeneuve, William
  2. Choix de 1e ronde en 2024 (TOR)
3.
EDM
  1. Timmins, Conor
  2. Choix de 3e ronde en 2023 (TOR)
4.
TOR
    Retains half of Puljujärvi's contract.
    CBJ
    1. Choix de 4e ronde en 2024 (TOR)
    Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
    2023
    Logo de TOR
    Logo de OTT
    Logo de TOR
    Logo de TOR
    2024
    Logo de TOR
    Logo de TOR
    Logo de TOR
    Logo de OTT
    2025
    Logo de TOR
    Logo de TOR
    Logo de TOR
    Logo de TOR
    Logo de TOR
    TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
    2282 500 000 $78 489 996 $212 500 $0 $4 010 004 $

    Formation

    Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
    Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
    6 962 366 $6 962 366 $
    AD
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
    11 640 250 $11 640 250 $
    C
    UFA - 2
    Puljujarvi, Jesse
    1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
    Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
    950 000 $950 000 $
    AG
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
    11 000 000 $11 000 000 $
    C, AG
    NMC
    UFA - 3
    Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
    10 903 000 $10 903 000 $
    AD
    UFA - 3
    Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
    3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
    AG, C, AD
    M-NTC
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
    -1 456 250 $-1 456 250 $
    AG, C
    M-NTC
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
    2 250 000 $2 250 000 $
    AD, AG
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
    1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
    C
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
    2 100 000 $2 100 000 $
    AD, C, AG
    M-NTC
    UFA - 4
    Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
    840 630 $840 630 $
    AG, AD
    UFA - 1
    Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
    Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
    7 500 000 $7 500 000 $
    DG
    NMC
    UFA - 8
    Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
    5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
    DG/DD
    NTC
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
    4 687 500 $4 687 500 $
    G
    M-NTC
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
    800 000 $800 000 $
    DG
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Capitals de Washington
    1 250 000 $1 250 000 $
    DD
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
    1 800 000 $1 800 000 $
    G
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
    1 400 000 $1 400 000 $
    DG
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
    1 400 000 $1 400 000 $
    DD
    RFA - 2
    Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
    Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
    2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
    DD
    M-NTC
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
    5 625 000 $5 625 000 $
    DG
    NTC
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
    750 000 $750 000 $
    DG/DD
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
    3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
    AD
    UFA - 1

    Code d'intégration

    • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
    • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

    Texte intégré

    Cliquer pour surligner
    11 déc. 2022 à 12 h 39
    #26
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: mars 2017
    Messages: 4,812
    Mentions "j'aime": 2,012
    Quoting: jazzhandz321
    Truth be told Jensen's value probably lies somewhere between a first and a second. I think the going rate for that second tier of rental defensemen is often two second round picks which I think is more than fair for a second pair guy like Jensen (see Giordano last TDL).


    Why the 2nd and 3rd here isn't a bad offer.
    11 déc. 2022 à 12 h 43
    #27
    Démarrer sujet
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: mai 2015
    Messages: 1,100
    Mentions "j'aime": 220
    Quoting: swinny
    Why the 2nd and 3rd here isn't a bad offer.


    Agreed I think the offer here is strong , a third + C level prospect roughly is equal to a 2nd IMO. If washington gets more that'd be fantastic but I think this is the max I'd be comfortable giving up for Jensen
    swinny a aimé ceci.
    11 déc. 2022 à 13 h 52
    #28
    Fantasy Hockey Pro
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juin 2016
    Messages: 5,195
    Mentions "j'aime": 2,302
    Quoting: swinny
    Did I say they should?

    I just think you are overvaluing Jensen. 2nd yes. 1st is a stretch.




    11 déc. 2022 à 14 h 41
    #29
    Future Ducks legend
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juin 2022
    Messages: 10,136
    Mentions "j'aime": 6,907
    Quoting: swinny
    Certainly would be opposed to moving Kerfoot in such a package.

    Not sure I would go so far as to call him a "cap casualty" at this juncture. The Muzzin situation (I strongly feel he won't be back given some offseason comments) has cleared that issue up.

    I recognize Henrique's offensive game is both better and more consistent than Kerfoot's, but defensively they are very much a wash.

    A Kerfoot inclusion for Anahiem gives them another movable asset in such deal (seeing a 2nd rounder or early 3rd).

    For the Leafs, non retention is more an issue next year, so not sure this would be of any assistance to Dubas.

    Stranger things have happened.


    I don't think Kerfoot is a 2nd or a 3rd unless his cap is 50% retained, and at that point, it would be 2/3 of our slots, and we still have 3 defensemen we might move. More than likely kerfoor would ride out the year with us because no team who could use his services has the cap space for him.
    11 déc. 2022 à 15 h 13
    #30
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: mars 2017
    Messages: 4,812
    Mentions "j'aime": 2,012
    Quoting: GiggywithGibby
    I don't think Kerfoot is a 2nd or a 3rd unless his cap is 50% retained, and at that point, it would be 2/3 of our slots, and we still have 3 defensemen we might move. More than likely kerfoor would ride out the year with us because no team who could use his services has the cap space for him.


    Why I think the Ducks retaining maximizes the return
    11 déc. 2022 à 15 h 18
    #31
    Démarrer sujet
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: mai 2015
    Messages: 1,100
    Mentions "j'aime": 220
    Quoting: brady_t12




    Having underrated players is a gift and a curse, the value they bring under the radar is obviously amazing however the reputation they carry also effects their value. It wasn't too long ago when the capitals were scratching Jensen on a consistent basis. Stuff like that does effect the cost for a player IMO
    11 déc. 2022 à 15 h 18
    #32
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: mars 2017
    Messages: 4,812
    Mentions "j'aime": 2,012
    Quoting: brady_t12




    So by the JFresh argument, you just proved my point.

    1. I already stated Jensen was an under rated D.

    2. On that list, I would say Reilly and Holden maybe available, neither of whom get a 1st.

    3. Jensen isn't so far removed from either of those players to justify a 1st.

    4. If Jensen came with term, it may change the conversation (see Seigenthaler.... who is younger)

    Again..... Jensen is absolutely worth a 2nd. Maybe an additional pick (I can conceded that). But a 1st? No.
    jazzhandz321 a aimé ceci.
    11 déc. 2022 à 15 h 24
    #33
    Fantasy Hockey Pro
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juin 2016
    Messages: 5,195
    Mentions "j'aime": 2,302
    Quoting: swinny
    So by the JFresh argument, you just proved my point.

    1. I already stated Jensen was an under rated D.

    2. On that list, I would say Reilly and Holden maybe available, neither of whom get a 1st.

    3. Jensen isn't so far removed from either of those players to justify a 1st.

    4. If Jensen came with term, it may change the conversation (see Seigenthaler.... who is younger)

    Again..... Jensen is absolutely worth a 2nd. Maybe an additional pick (I can conceded that). But a 1st? No.


    I don’t know how your logic is working that I somehow proved your point…

    In Jensen’s ENTIRE tenure with the caps, he has never been a healthy scratch. Literally look up his hockey reference page. He’s only missed games with injuries. Over the time he’s been in DC, the most games he has missed in a season is 6 in 2021-22.

    The fact that you are comparing Jensen to Reilly and Holden proves that you actually don’t have any clue how good Jensen is. Reilly is literally in the AHL, Jensen is playing second pair minutes consistently and has been incredible. He also makes less than Reilly. He’s also the only RHD of those three.

    Jensen is worth at least a first round pick. Your argument is not based in any sort of fact, just what you think you know. I promise you, you’re not even close to being right here.
    11 déc. 2022 à 15 h 24
    #34
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: mars 2017
    Messages: 4,812
    Mentions "j'aime": 2,012
    Quoting: jazzhandz321
    Agreed I think the offer here is strong , a third + C level prospect roughly is equal to a 2nd IMO. If washington gets more that'd be fantastic but I think this is the max I'd be comfortable giving up for Jensen


    Leafs fans have the ability to over value players just as much as any inherent fan base. I get it. Can we all say Kerfoot?

    But when the constructive criticism on your valuation is almost unanimous, well.......
    11 déc. 2022 à 15 h 28
    #35
    Démarrer sujet
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: mai 2015
    Messages: 1,100
    Mentions "j'aime": 220
    Quoting: brady_t12
    I don’t know how your logic is working that I somehow proved your point…

    In Jensen’s ENTIRE tenure with the caps, he has never been a healthy scratch. Literally look up his hockey reference page. He’s only missed games with injuries. Over the time he’s been in DC, the most games he has missed in a season is 6 in 2021-22.

    The fact that you are comparing Jensen to Reilly and Holden proves that you actually don’t have any clue how good Jensen is. Reilly is literally in the AHL, Jensen is playing second pair minutes consistently and has been incredible. He also makes less than Reilly. He’s also the only RHD of those three.

    Jensen is worth at least a first round pick. Your argument is not based in any sort of fact, just what you think you know. I promise you, you’re not even close to being right here.


    TBF that is completely my bad, I got Kempny and Jensen mixed up. But even with that mix up I think the going rate for Jensen would still be two second round picks based on previous rental prices.
    swinny a aimé ceci.
    11 déc. 2022 à 15 h 33
    #36
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: mars 2017
    Messages: 4,812
    Mentions "j'aime": 2,012
    Quoting: brady_t12
    I don’t know how your logic is working that I somehow proved your point…

    In Jensen’s ENTIRE tenure with the caps, he has never been a healthy scratch. Literally look up his hockey reference page. He’s only missed games with injuries. Over the time he’s been in DC, the most games he has missed in a season is 6 in 2021-22.

    The fact that you are comparing Jensen to Reilly and Holden proves that you actually don’t have any clue how good Jensen is. Reilly is literally in the AHL, Jensen is playing second pair minutes consistently and has been incredible. He also makes less than Reilly. He’s also the only RHD of those three.

    Jensen is worth at least a first round pick. Your argument is not based in any sort of fact, just what you think you know. I promise you, you’re not even close to being right here.


    Lmfao!

    OK bud. You presented the list of under rated D with those names on it. I didn't compare them, your source did.

    But when everyone who has commented in this thread is saying a 2nd with another pick is probably the going rate.... you may want to re evaluate.

    I know my puck. I am aware of how effective Jensen is. You can keep selling it, but seems to me no one is buying it.
    11 déc. 2022 à 16 h 44
    #37
    Fantasy Hockey Pro
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juin 2016
    Messages: 5,195
    Mentions "j'aime": 2,302
    Quoting: swinny
    Lmfao!

    OK bud. You presented the list of under rated D with those names on it. I didn't compare them, your source did.

    But when everyone who has commented in this thread is saying a 2nd with another pick is probably the going rate.... you may want to re evaluate.

    I know my puck. I am aware of how effective Jensen is. You can keep selling it, but seems to me no one is buying it.


    Ask anyone who actually watches the caps. I’m sorry you’re so hurt that you don’t know what you’re talking about. Just giving you a reality check 👍🏼
    11 déc. 2022 à 21 h 17
    #38
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: mars 2017
    Messages: 4,812
    Mentions "j'aime": 2,012
    Quoting: brady_t12
    Ask anyone who actually watches the caps. I’m sorry you’re so hurt that you don’t know what you’re talking about. Just giving you a reality check 👍🏼


    No you are not lol.

    That is like saying ask anyone who watches the Leafs, Kerfoot is worth what Dvorak got. Reality dictates otherwise.

    You also think Sheary is worth a first. Every Cap is worth a first.

    I know what I watch. I know what I see.

    I will say it again and again and again.

    Jensen nets a 2nd +. Absolutely. He isn't getting a first.
     
    Répondre
    To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
    Question:
    Options:
    Ajouter une option
    Soumettre le sondage