Rejoint: mai 2015
Messages: 19,601
Mentions "j'aime": 6,738
Nice explanation Lefty! Thanks.
The way I see it, on paper, this trade does make some sense. Personally though, from my experience from previous real NHL trades, blogger discussions and general "rule of thumb" mentalities, the value associated with taking on salary and term of a player you know you don't really want and will not really benefit from the trade himself (in this case Lecavalier) , is so not worth it that it makes the "good" parts of the trade like the prospects and picks worth less they are. I'm not trying to say that Lecavalier is the scum of the earth and is a terrible hockey player, just that his value (not ability) as a player is like worth negative points right now.
So when dissecting the trade down to all it's components and re-evaluating each one in the trade, Carolina would be better off (value-wise) trading Skinner to a team for lesser "good" prospects and picks than the trade rumour listed. Let me paint the scenario:
If your a Gm and your team is cap-conscious due to the owner's financial constraints or just because your team already has a lot of salary and can't just blow money left and right on fringe players, which one of these would be A) less risky for the future and B) still net you a good return?
Team A trades -
1st rounder 2016
Prospect (Something like a former 2nd round pick within the last 3 years prospect - similar to Cousins)
For
Skinner 5.75M
Or
Flyers trade -
Lecavalier 4.5M
Schenn 3.2M
Cousins 0.9M
1st rounder
3rd rounder
For
Skinner 5.75M
4th rounder