SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

LW for an RD

Créé par: xercuses
Équipe: 2022-23 Kraken de Seattle
Date de création initiale: 18 août 2022
Publié: 18 août 2022
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Transactions
SEA
  1. Barrie, Tyson
Détails additionnels:
Could work EDM give Bouchard the mantle
EDM
  1. Borgen, William
  2. Wennberg, Alexander (1 000 000 $ retained)
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2023
Logo de SEA
Logo de SEA
Logo de TOR
Logo de WPG
Logo de SEA
Logo de SEA
Logo de COL
Logo de SEA
Logo de SEA
Logo de WSH
Logo de SEA
2024
Logo de SEA
Logo de SEA
Logo de SEA
Logo de TOR
Logo de SEA
Logo de SEA
Logo de SEA
Logo de SEA
Logo de CGY
2025
Logo de SEA
Logo de SEA
Logo de SEA
Logo de SEA
Logo de SEA
Logo de SEA
Logo de SEA
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2382 500 000 $78 014 166 $0 $925 000 $4 485 834 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Kraken de Seattle
5 500 000 $5 500 000 $
AD, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 5
Logo de Kraken de Seattle
897 500 $897 500 $ (Bonis de performance925 000 $$925K)
C
RFA - 2
Logo de Kraken de Seattle
5 500 000 $5 500 000 $
AD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Kraken de Seattle
5 500 000 $5 500 000 $
AG
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo de Kraken de Seattle
950 000 $950 000 $
C
RFA - 4
Logo de Kraken de Seattle
5 400 000 $5 400 000 $
AD, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo de Kraken de Seattle
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 5
Logo de Kraken de Seattle
5 166 666 $5 166 666 $
C, AG, AD
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Kraken de Seattle
3 900 000 $3 900 000 $
AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Kraken de Seattle
1 200 000 $1 200 000 $
AG, C, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Kraken de Seattle
1 400 000 $1 400 000 $
C, AD
RFA - 1
Logo de Kraken de Seattle
3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
AG, AD
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Kraken de Seattle
4 000 000 $4 000 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Kraken de Seattle
4 000 000 $4 000 000 $
DD
NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Kraken de Seattle
5 900 000 $5 900 000 $
G
NTC
UFA - 5
Logo de Kraken de Seattle
4 600 000 $4 600 000 $
DG/DD
NTC
UFA - 4
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
4 500 000 $4 500 000 $
DD
UFA - 2
Logo de Kraken de Seattle
2 750 000 $2 750 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Kraken de Seattle
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Kraken de Seattle
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
G
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Kraken de Seattle
750 000 $750 000 $
C, AD
RFA - 1
Logo de Kraken de Seattle
3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
G
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Kraken de Seattle
850 000 $850 000 $
AD
RFA - 1
Logo de Kraken de Seattle
750 000 $750 000 $
DG
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
18 août 2022 à 14 h 47
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2021
Messages: 236
Mentions "j'aime": 83
Based off the reports of what CAL had to give up to get Monahan off the books, there is going to be nothing going back in a Barrie deal.
MP55 a aimé ceci.
18 août 2022 à 14 h 48
#2
Démarrer sujet
Xercuses
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2021
Messages: 13,487
Mentions "j'aime": 3,610
Quoting: huey2107
Based off the reports of what CAL had to give up to get Monahan off the books, there is going to be nothing going back in a Barrie deal.


wennberg was trash too so its more a need for a need but i think folgele gets moved
18 août 2022 à 14 h 50
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2022
Messages: 1,627
Mentions "j'aime": 588
Quoting: huey2107
Based off the reports of what CAL had to give up to get Monahan off the books, there is going to be nothing going back in a Barrie deal.


in now way is Barrie in the same situation as Monahan.
xercuses a aimé ceci.
18 août 2022 à 14 h 58
#4
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2021
Messages: 236
Mentions "j'aime": 83
Quoting: gary_gobbler
in now way is Barrie in the same situation as Monahan.


Hes a career dash player that is 31 years old, and making a lot of money on a team that is 6M over the cap, how is he not?
18 août 2022 à 15 h 0
#5
rookescr96
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2021
Messages: 674
Mentions "j'aime": 191
Would love this move for the Oilers just don't think it will ever work out. One can hope tho
18 août 2022 à 15 h 5
#6
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2022
Messages: 1,627
Mentions "j'aime": 588
Quoting: huey2107
Hes a career dash player that is 31 years old, and making a lot of money on a team that is 6M over the cap, how is he not?


smith and klefbom aren't placed on LTIR, that's 6 million right there. Monahan has struggled with multiple injuries, making him absolutely no where near 6.35 million. Barrie has a ton of offensive upside, although his advanced stats show he's a terrible defender (mostly true), he's actually improved a ton under Woodcroft and was a solid defender in the playoffs. If you're basing his defensive skills off of his career +/- you should just leave this thread. Horrible stat to use that means nothing. Not to mention Monahan's contract is 1.85 aav more.
xercuses et arab05 a aimé ceci.
18 août 2022 à 15 h 25
#7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2021
Messages: 236
Mentions "j'aime": 83
Quoting: gary_gobbler
smith and klefbom aren't placed on LTIR, that's 6 million right there. Monahan has struggled with multiple injuries, making him absolutely no where near 6.35 million. Barrie has a ton of offensive upside, although his advanced stats show he's a terrible defender (mostly true), he's actually improved a ton under Woodcroft and was a solid defender in the playoffs. If you're basing his defensive skills off of his career +/- you should just leave this thread. Horrible stat to use that means nothing. Not to mention Monahan's contract is 1.85 aav more.


I mean if we are talking expected goals for versus against, he also, has never been a positive either, so I am struggling to understand what you are missing in that category? If you put him out there for 60 minutes, the expectation is that he will get scored on more than his line scores. How does that "offensive upside" outweigh his defensive shortcomings?
18 août 2022 à 15 h 27
#8
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2022
Messages: 1,627
Mentions "j'aime": 588
Quoting: huey2107
I mean if we are talking expected goals for versus against, he also, has never been a positive either, so I am struggling to understand what you are missing in that category? If you put him out there for 60 minutes, the expectation is that he will get scored on more than his line scores. How does that "offensive upside" outweigh his defensive shortcomings?


you used a plus minus to describe a players defensive ability, no?
CD282 a aimé ceci.
18 août 2022 à 15 h 29
#9
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2021
Messages: 236
Mentions "j'aime": 83
Quoting: gary_gobbler
you used a plus minus to describe a players defensive ability, no?


I mean, yes, he is absolutely a dash player career overall, and hes also a dash player analytically, so I am struggling to understand your point? Any way that you look at it, he is a dash player, in the real world or in the world of analytics, he literally like the perfect example of an analytic working
18 août 2022 à 15 h 38
#10
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2022
Messages: 1,627
Mentions "j'aime": 588
Quoting: huey2107
I mean, yes, he is absolutely a dash player career overall, and hes also a dash player analytically, so I am struggling to understand your point? Any way that you look at it, he is a dash player, in the real world or in the world of analytics, he literally like the perfect example of an analytic working


I never said he wasn't, but you used his plus minus lol. All I said is he improved under woodcroft during the playoffs. Still don't need to send a first to move him, which was your original point. Plus / minus statistic includes all even strength goals, all goals with either goaltender pulled. I'm not sure why you're trying to tell me he's bad defensively when I already admitted he is lmao, this isn't news to me.
18 août 2022 à 15 h 54
#11
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2017
Messages: 23,950
Mentions "j'aime": 7,722
Quoting: huey2107
Based off the reports of what CAL had to give up to get Monahan off the books, there is going to be nothing going back in a Barrie deal.


Quoting: xercuses
wennberg was trash too so its more a need for a need but i think folgele gets moved

The ONLY reason for Edmonton to move Barrie is for cap relief. This deal gives them 2 crap players and $100k cap savings, so no deal.

Barrie has bee good for Edmonton, and he's been a positive player (GF% Rel) in every season of his past 9 except for the one in Toronto. He's not overpaid, he's not underperforming. They aren't moving him for nothing.
gary_ a aimé ceci.
18 août 2022 à 16 h 8
#12
ARAB05
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2019
Messages: 795
Mentions "j'aime": 428
Quoting: huey2107
Hes a career dash player that is 31 years old, and making a lot of money on a team that is 6M over the cap, how is he not?


Using +/- as an argument tells me how much hockey you actually watch! HAHA
18 août 2022 à 16 h 9
#13
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2021
Messages: 236
Mentions "j'aime": 83
Quoting: arab05
Using +/- as an argument tells me how much hockey you actually watch! HAHA


I will repeat again, he is a dash player both analytically and in real life, perfect example of analytics working.
18 août 2022 à 16 h 59
#14
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2022
Messages: 1,627
Mentions "j'aime": 588
Quoting: huey2107
I will repeat again, he is a dash player both analytically and in real life, perfect example of analytics working.


Klingberg has horrific defensive analytics, doesn't mean Anaheim has to send a first when they trade him at the deadline.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage