SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Another Kraken Trade Compilation

Créé par: KrakenTheCode
Équipe: 2022-23 Kraken de Seattle
Date de création initiale: 7 août 2022
Publié: 8 août 2022
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
This is another compilation of proposed trades involving the Kraken that were created by people on CapFriendly. I've included my thoughts on each as well. I didn't include proposed trades I covered in my previous edition, the link to which is pasted below:

https://www.capfriendly.com/armchair-gm/team/3532705

Once again, most of these proposed trades I saw don't really make sense for Seattle, whether it was from a value or fit standpoint. I think everyone looked at the Bjorkstrand trade and figured Seattle was open for business when it came to dealing their stockpile of draft picks. The truth is acquiring Bjorkstrand was the result of the Kraken weaponizing their cap space to get a very good player at a steep discount who is in his prime and under contract for multiple years at a fair rate. It does NOT mean they are willing to pay a premium for veteran salaries other capped out teams are desperate to move.

Overall of all the trade proposals created by others that are listed here, only trades 5 and 6 make some sense for Seattle in my opinion. Even in those cases the deals might require some tweaks, and Seattle's willingness to pull the trigger on either would hinge on non-quantifiable factors.
Transactions
1.
SEA
  1. Pearson, Tanner
Détails additionnels:
Pearson's a decent player, but the Kraken have a bunch of veteran winger depth already, especially after re-signing Donato. They have zero reason to help bail the Canucks out of their cap situation by paying a draft pick for a player similar to Donato, especially when the proposed price is not much less than what they paid for Bjorkstrand, who is a far superior player to Pearson.
VAN
  1. Choix de 3e ronde en 2023 (SEA)
2.
SEA
  1. Dillon, Brenden
Détails additionnels:
The Kraken are well stocked at left defense with Dunn, Oleksiak, and Soucy, not to mention Ryker Evans waiting in the wings. With that in mind, it doesn't make sense for them to trade draft picks they could use to build up their draft pool for a 31 year old defenseman who they could have had in the expansion draft.
WPG
  1. Choix de 2e ronde en 2023 (WPG)
  2. Choix de 6e ronde en 2023 (SEA)
3.
SEA
  1. Ruhwedel, Chad
Détails additionnels:
This sort of deal where a team gives up a draft pick for veteran depth is one a team more ready to seriously contend would make (like Pittsburgh, ironically enough). For Seattle, it makes more sense to keep their draft picks to build up their prospect pool and give Will Borgen a chance as the third pairing right defenseman.
PIT
  1. Choix de 4e ronde en 2023 (SEA)
4.
SEA
  1. Zucker, Jason
  2. Choix de 1e ronde en 2023 (PIT)
  3. Choix de 4e ronde en 2025 (PIT)
Détails additionnels:
The first round pick is enticing, but I doubt the Kraken go for this. Given the costs to shed salary right now, it's likely going to cost quite a bit for Pittsburgh to offload Zucker, even though he only has one year left on his deal (See how Columbus traded Bjorkstrand instead of Nyquist to become compliant). I don't think a late first and fourth is enough to both do that and return McCann, who is locked up through his prime at an affordable rate and is coming off a breakout season. Not to mention Seattle just extended him, so clearly they view him as a key piece to their core moving forward.
5.
SEA
  1. McGinn, Brock
  2. Choix de 2e ronde en 2023 (PIT)
  3. Choix de 4e ronde en 2024 (PIT)
Détails additionnels:
This is more along the lines of what Seattle would do at this point in time; take on other teams' salary to gain additional draft capital. It is worth noting that Tanev was having a very good season prior to his injury, and the Kraken seem to value him as a leader. So that has to be taken into consideration. Beyond that, whether Seattle takes this sort of deal or not depends on if the draft picks are enough value to make it worth both downgrading from Tanev to McGinn and retaining half of Tanev's salary for three years.
PIT
  1. Tanev, Brandon (1 750 000 $ retained)
6.
SEA
  1. Kerfoot, Alexander
Détails additionnels:
Of all the trades I've seen sending Kerfoot and/or Holl to Seattle, this is probably the most realistic. Most involve Seattle giving up 2nd or 3rd round picks, which I don't think they'll go for given where they are at as a franchise. However, I could see this sort of deal framework happening IF the Kraken want to prioritize an immediate boost to their forward group over giving someone like Geekie development time and they think they can extend Kerfoot.
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2023
Logo de SEA
Logo de PIT
Logo de SEA
Logo de TOR
Logo de PIT
Logo de COL
Logo de SEA
Logo de WSH
Logo de SEA
2024
Logo de SEA
Logo de SEA
Logo de SEA
Logo de TOR
Logo de SEA
Logo de PIT
Logo de SEA
Logo de SEA
Logo de SEA
Logo de CGY
2025
Logo de SEA
Logo de SEA
Logo de SEA
Logo de SEA
Logo de PIT
Logo de SEA
Logo de SEA
Logo de SEA
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2382 500 000 $83 839 166 $0 $925 000 $-1 339 166 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Kraken de Seattle
5 500 000 $5 500 000 $
AD, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 5
Logo de Kraken de Seattle
897 500 $897 500 $ (Bonis de performance925 000 $$925K)
C
RFA - 2
Logo de Kraken de Seattle
5 500 000 $5 500 000 $
AD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Kraken de Seattle
5 500 000 $5 500 000 $
AG
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo de Kraken de Seattle
5 166 666 $5 166 666 $
C, AG, AD
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Kraken de Seattle
5 400 000 $5 400 000 $
AD, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
3 250 000 $3 250 000 $
AG
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Kraken de Seattle
2 250 000 $2 250 000 $
C
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Kraken de Seattle
3 900 000 $3 900 000 $
AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Kraken de Seattle
1 200 000 $1 200 000 $
AG, C, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
AG, C, AD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
5 500 000 $5 500 000 $
AG, AD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Kraken de Seattle
4 600 000 $4 600 000 $
DG/DD
NTC
UFA - 4
Logo de Kraken de Seattle
4 000 000 $4 000 000 $
DD
NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Kraken de Seattle
5 900 000 $5 900 000 $
G
NTC
UFA - 5
Logo de Kraken de Seattle
4 000 000 $4 000 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Kraken de Seattle
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Kraken de Seattle
2 750 000 $2 750 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Kraken de Seattle
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
G
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Jets de Winnipeg
3 900 000 $3 900 000 $
DG
UFA - 2
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
2 750 000 $2 750 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 3
Logo de Kraken de Seattle
3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
G
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
800 000 $800 000 $
DD
UFA - 2
Logo de Kraken de Seattle
825 000 $825 000 $
AD
UFA - 1
Équipe de réserve
Logo de Kraken de Seattle
950 000 $950 000 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
C
RFA - 4
Logo de Kraken de Seattle
850 000 $850 000 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Kraken de Seattle
900 000 $900 000 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
DD
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
8 août 2022 à 13 h 42
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2021
Messages: 3,618
Mentions "j'aime": 3,044
I think we can all agree Seattle is mostly a placeholder for “any team”
Ddug, Jets33 et Elias_Sedin a aimé ceci.
8 août 2022 à 14 h 0
#2
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2020
Messages: 79
Mentions "j'aime": 37
Quoting: Canesfan21_
I think we can all agree Seattle is mostly a placeholder for “any team”


Probably but this is an interesting breakdown of these proposed deals. Nice to have the logic behind why someone thinks a trade wouldn't work vs the standard "that's dumb, instantly rejected" type response
8 août 2022 à 14 h 0
#3
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2022
Messages: 786
Mentions "j'aime": 492
Quoting: Canesfan21_
I think we can all agree Seattle is mostly a placeholder for “any team”


There were definitely some of those, but I didn’t include any in this post. For each of the trades above there were at least a couple of examples where people were directing them towards Seattle specifically.
8 août 2022 à 15 h 6
#4
The Canucks Suck
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2020
Messages: 468
Mentions "j'aime": 109
Canucks accept
8 août 2022 à 15 h 6
#5
The Canucks Suck
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2020
Messages: 468
Mentions "j'aime": 109
Quoting: KrakenTheCode
There were definitely some of those, but I didn’t include any in this post. For each of the trades above there were at least a couple of examples where people were directing them towards Seattle specifically.


Would you do Pearson for Soucy
8 août 2022 à 15 h 15
#6
Pens are the best
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2021
Messages: 5,390
Mentions "j'aime": 1,691
Pens accept the 1st and 3rd trades
8 août 2022 à 15 h 40
#7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2021
Messages: 1,016
Mentions "j'aime": 426
I'm at the point where I don't understand the Penguin deals from our perspective either. The Hextall management protected Kappy and Carter over McCann. They resigned McGinn as a Tanev lite. They just extended Ruhwedel, and are happy with having this many NHL caliber defensemen. We can discuss the effectiveness of these moves all we want, but I doubt they'll want to go back on these moves so soon. Besides, I think it's worth noting 1) that with how stacked next year's draft is expected to be, I'd be very hesitant to give up a 2023 first for 1 more year of Zucker, and 2) McGinn was a lot better in the first half of the season than the 2nd, and missed a good portion of March and April.
8 août 2022 à 17 h 41
#8
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2022
Messages: 786
Mentions "j'aime": 492
Quoting: SamTheGoalie36
Would you do Pearson for Soucy


Probably not. The Kraken have a surplus of forwards that are either younger than Pearson and need playing time to develop or are just better. There's not really room for him. Plus, the Kraken seem to really like Soucy and turned down trade offers for him last year, so I get the impression they might end up extending him.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage