SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

sell 1 goolie

Créé par: Pete
Équipe: 2022-23 Sharks de San Jose
Date de création initiale: 30 juill. 2022
Publié: 3 août 2022
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Transactions
1.
SJS
  1. van Riemsdyk, James
  2. Choix de 3e ronde en 2023 (FLA)
2.
SJS
  1. Zaitsev, Nikita (500 000 $ retained)
3.
SJS
  1. Choix de 1e ronde en 2023 (TBL)
CHI
  1. Ferraro, Mario [Droits de RFA]
4.
ARI
  1. van Riemsdyk, James (1 150 000 $ retained)
Rachats de contrats
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2023
Logo de SJS
Logo de TBL
Logo de SJS
Logo de CAR
Logo de FLA
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de CBJ
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de VAN
2024
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de COL
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
2025
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2082 500 000 $71 511 668 $0 $250 000 $10 988 332 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
8 000 000 $8 000 000 $
C
M-NTC
UFA - 5
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
2 750 000 $2 750 000 $
AD, C
RFA - 2
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
2 500 000 $2 500 000 $
AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
6 750 000 $6 750 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 8
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
4 725 000 $4 725 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
2 500 000 $2 500 000 $
AD, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
916 667 $916 667 $
C, AG
RFA - 2
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
750 000 $750 000 $
AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
750 000 $750 000 $
AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
C
UFA - 3
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
1 050 000 $1 050 000 $
C, AG, AD
UFA - 2
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
7 000 000 $7 000 000 $
DG/DD
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
10 000 000 $10 000 000 $
DD
NMC
UFA - 5
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
2 750 000 $2 750 000 $
G
UFA - 2
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
850 000 $850 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
4 000 000 $4 000 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $ (Bonis de performance250 000 $$250K)
DG/DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
2 175 000 $2 175 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
1 250 000 $1 250 000 $
DD
UFA - 4
Équipe de réserve
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
850 000 $850 000 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
762 500 $762 500 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
DG
UFA - 2

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
3 août 2022 à 15 h 3
#1
Bedard23
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2021
Messages: 9,360
Mentions "j'aime": 4,541
Kyle Davidson is currently doing his best Sam Hinkie impression so that’s a no from us
3 août 2022 à 15 h 27
#2
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 852
Mentions "j'aime": 323
I don't think you get a 1st for Ferraro. Also, that Zaitsev trade is horrifying. He's a worse player than Simek getting paid twice as much, and Simek isn't even a very good player.
3 août 2022 à 15 h 27
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2020
Messages: 11,387
Mentions "j'aime": 4,746
None of these deals make the sharks better and i doubt any of the other teams agree to the deals anyways.
not sure your ideas or motivations to try these deals?
3 août 2022 à 15 h 29
#4
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2020
Messages: 11,387
Mentions "j'aime": 4,746
Quoting: Waffelz
I don't think you get a 1st for Ferraro. Also, that Zaitsev trade is horrifying. He's a worse player than Simek getting paid twice as much, and Simek isn't even a very good player.


Ferraro is worth a 1st. regardless even if we could get a 1st, he is by far our our best LD and we should NOT consider trading him.
Burnzie8_88_4Cup a aimé ceci.
3 août 2022 à 15 h 37
#5
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 8,322
Mentions "j'aime": 3,726
Quoting: Waffelz
I don't think you get a 1st for Ferraro. Also, that Zaitsev trade is horrifying. He's a worse player than Simek getting paid twice as much, and Simek isn't even a very good player.


You don’t think Tampas 1st would get Ferraro? Wow must be really low on him. Goodrow got a Tampa 1st. Ferraro is 23 and puts in so many minutes, worth more than a late 1st. If Dach got the 13th overall, Ferraro certainly can get a 1st
Shorkz et Rob32sjsharks a aimé ceci.
3 août 2022 à 17 h 19
#6
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 852
Mentions "j'aime": 323
Quoting: glarson17
You don’t think Tampas 1st would get Ferraro? Wow must be really low on him. Goodrow got a Tampa 1st. Ferraro is 23 and puts in so many minutes, worth more than a late 1st. If Dach got the 13th overall, Ferraro certainly can get a 1st


Let me start by saying I'm a big fan of Ferraro. I don't want to trade him, and he's a great guy for the Sharks. That said, he played big minutes last year and absolutely got his face caved in. He is a good defenseman, but not good enough to be playing 25 minutes a night. A late first is probably possible for a return, but I don't think the Sharks should entertain late firsts in exchange for one of their only defensemen with upside.
Rob32sjsharks a aimé ceci.
3 août 2022 à 18 h 41
#7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2020
Messages: 11,387
Mentions "j'aime": 4,746
Quoting: Waffelz
Let me start by saying I'm a big fan of Ferraro. I don't want to trade him, and he's a great guy for the Sharks. That said, he played big minutes last year and absolutely got his face caved in. He is a good defenseman, but not good enough to be playing 25 minutes a night. A late first is probably possible for a return, but I don't think the Sharks should entertain late firsts in exchange for one of their only defensemen with upside.


I feel this season might not be a great showing if he is paired with Karsson i feel he will have to be so focused on D that his offensive numbers remain stagnant. i really want to see him paired with a defensively minded RD so he can play up and showcase his offensive potential.
No matter what though a late 1st will not replace Ferraro or his ability or leadership here and would be foolish of us to even entertain trading.
Waffelz a aimé ceci.
3 août 2022 à 20 h 26
#8
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 852
Mentions "j'aime": 323
Quoting: Rob32sjsharks
I feel this season might not be a great showing if he is paired with Karsson i feel he will have to be so focused on D that his offensive numbers remain stagnant. i really want to see him paired with a defensively minded RD so he can play up and showcase his offensive potential.
No matter what though a late 1st will not replace Ferraro or his ability or leadership here and would be foolish of us to even entertain trading.


I'm hoping to see the lines start something like Knyzhov/Karlsson, Ferarro/Nutivaara, Vlasic/Benning, with Simek scratched. I don't like Merkley as a starter based on his play last year, but I am worried that Knyzhov won't be the player he was a year ago. If he doesn't work out, I think you end up forced to pair Vlasic with Karlsson, which has historically not been a fantastic pairing. Vlasic did show some frustration in his exit interview last spring about his icetime. If he really thinks he can handle more icetime, why not give it a shot?
Rob32sjsharks a aimé ceci.
3 août 2022 à 23 h 33
#9
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2020
Messages: 11,387
Mentions "j'aime": 4,746
Quoting: Waffelz
I'm hoping to see the lines start something like Knyzhov/Karlsson, Ferarro/Nutivaara, Vlasic/Benning, with Simek scratched. I don't like Merkley as a starter based on his play last year, but I am worried that Knyzhov won't be the player he was a year ago. If he doesn't work out, I think you end up forced to pair Vlasic with Karlsson, which has historically not been a fantastic pairing. Vlasic did show some frustration in his exit interview last spring about his icetime. If he really thinks he can handle more icetime, why not give it a shot?


because when given ice time he shows really poorly.
4 août 2022 à 0 h 45
#10
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 852
Mentions "j'aime": 323
Quoting: Rob32sjsharks
because when given ice time he shows really poorly.


The Sharks have 2 guys who have proven they can handle top 4 minutes last year (Karlsson, Ferraro). Megna isn't even a lock to start in the NHL, Merkely doesn't look good enough yet, Simek was a "healthy" scratch all year, Nutivaara/Benning are total question marks in the Sharks system, which leaves... Vlasic and Knyzhov. Knyzhov hasn't played a game at any level in over a year. I definitely don't think the Sharks defense is in a good spot, I'm just trying to be realistic about their options.
4 août 2022 à 1 h 26
#11
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2020
Messages: 11,387
Mentions "j'aime": 4,746
Quoting: Waffelz
The Sharks have 2 guys who have proven they can handle top 4 minutes last year (Karlsson, Ferraro). Megna isn't even a lock to start in the NHL, Merkely doesn't look good enough yet, Simek was a "healthy" scratch all year, Nutivaara/Benning are total question marks in the Sharks system, which leaves... Vlasic and Knyzhov. Knyzhov hasn't played a game at any level in over a year. I definitely don't think the Sharks defense is in a good spot, I'm just trying to be realistic about their options.


agree! sharks have a lot of guys but none that make me feel comfortable about our top 4 beyond ferraro and Karlsson and even they don’t give me a ton of confidence, ferraro had a bad year last year and karlsson feels like he could be injured in warm ups since comming over to the sharks.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage