SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Going young in goal in order to strengthen other areas of team

Créé par: ItWasIn
Équipe: 2017-18 Flames de Calgary
Date de création initiale: 12 mai 2017
Publié: 12 mai 2017
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
32 500 000 $
2900 000 $
32 750 000 $
21 500 000 $
2825 000 $
1660 000 $
2650 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
33 700 000 $
66 000 000 $
Transactions
1.
CGY
  1. Choix de 3e ronde en 2018 (CGY)
STL
2.
CGY
    Grubauer
    WSH
    1. Choix de 4e ronde en 2018 (FLA)
    Détails additionnels:
    Rights to RFA G David Rittich
    3.
    CGY
      Korpisalo
      CBJ
      1. Shinkaruk, Hunter
      2. Choix de 3e ronde en 2018 (CGY)
      Détails additionnels:
      after expansion draft
      4.
      NYI
      1. Andersson, Rasmus
      2. Choix de 4e ronde en 2018 (CGY)
      Détails additionnels:
      2017 1st round pick 16th overall
      5.
      6.
      CGY
        Stone re-signs
        ARI
        1. Choix de 5e ronde en 2018 (CGY)
        7.
        CGY
          This is not my ideal scenario, as the goaltending is a potential question mark. However as inconsistent as last seasons tandem was, it wasn't the only issue. I think Grubauer and Korpisalo have the potential to be better than a guy like Fleury. If that's the case then I'd rather spend the money on adding a top RW and 4th D as opposed to a guy like MAF (although I wouldn't be upset as I think he will end up here anyway)
          ANA
          Rachats de contrats
          Enfoui
          Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
          2018
          Logo de CGY
          Logo de CGY
          Logo de CGY
          Logo de CGY
          2019
          Logo de CGY
          Logo de CGY
          Logo de CGY
          Logo de CGY
          Logo de CGY
          Logo de CGY
          Logo de CGY
          2020
          Logo de CGY
          Logo de CGY
          Logo de CGY
          Logo de CGY
          Logo de CGY
          Logo de CGY
          Logo de CGY
          TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
          2374 000 000 $69 440 876 $660 000 $1 487 500 $4 559 124 $
          Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
          6 750 000 $6 750 000 $
          AG
          UFA - 5
          6 375 000 $6 375 000 $
          C, AG, AD
          UFA - 6
          6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
          AD
          UFA - 8
          925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
          AD
          UFA - 2
          3 575 000 $3 575 000 $
          C
          UFA - 1
          4 300 000 $4 300 000 $
          AG, AD
          M-NTC
          UFA - 3
          1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
          AG, AD
          UFA - 2
          2 750 000 $2 750 000 $
          C
          UFA - 2
          825 000 $825 000 $
          AD, C
          UFA - 2
          863 333 $863 333 $
          AG
          UFA - 1
          612 500 $612 500 $
          C, AD
          UFA - 1
          4 500 000 $4 500 000 $
          AG, AD
          NTC
          UFA - 3
          925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance637 500 $$638K)
          C, AG
          UFA - 1
          650 000 $650 000 $
          AD, AG
          UFA - 1
          Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
          3 375 000 $3 375 000 $
          DG
          NTC
          UFA - 5
          5 750 000 $5 750 000 $
          DD
          UFA - 4
          4 650 400 $4 650 400 $
          DG/DD
          M-NTC
          UFA - 3
          3 857 143 $3 857 143 $
          DD
          UFA - 3
          660 000 $660 000 $
          DG/DD
          UFA - 1
          3 700 000 $3 700 000 $
          DD
          UFA - 3
          2 500 000 $2 500 000 $
          G
          UFA - 1
          612 500 $612 500 $
          DD
          UFA - 1
          900 000 $900 000 $
          G
          UFA - 2

          Code d'intégration

          • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
          • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

          Texte intégré

          Cliquer pour surligner
          12 mai 2017 à 20 h 31
          #1
          Islanders Fan
          Avatar de l'utilisateur
          Rejoint: mai 2016
          Messages: 7,875
          Mentions "j'aime": 2,785
          Modifié 12 mai 2017 à 20 h 37
          I think the Islanders need to trade Hamonic this offseason for a forward and the flexibility to protect Pulock under 7-3-1 format. But if the right deal didn't happen for a Top-6, I could live with that trade.
          12 mai 2017 à 20 h 34
          #2
          Démarrer sujet
          CGY
          Avatar de l'utilisateur
          Rejoint: déc. 2015
          Messages: 5,551
          Mentions "j'aime": 2,069
          Quoting: joshelkin
          I think the Islanders need to trade Hamonic this offseason for a forwards and the flexibility to protect Pulock under 7-3-1 format. But if the right deal didn't happen for a Top-6, I could live with that trade.


          I would add an additional pick or Ferland if that works?
          12 mai 2017 à 20 h 39
          #3
          Islanders Fan
          Avatar de l'utilisateur
          Rejoint: mai 2016
          Messages: 7,875
          Mentions "j'aime": 2,785
          Quoting: JQuick32
          Quoting: joshelkin
          I think the Islanders need to trade Hamonic this offseason for a forwards and the flexibility to protect Pulock under 7-3-1 format. But if the right deal didn't happen for a Top-6, I could live with that trade.


          I would add an additional pick or Ferland if that works?


          I think Ferland would be ok. In an ideal world I would package Hamonic and say Dal Colle for Monahan but that's unlikely. I could live with that amended deal
          12 mai 2017 à 20 h 52
          #4
          Avatar de l'utilisateur
          Rejoint: juin 2016
          Messages: 7
          Mentions "j'aime": 0
          Gillies is only a year or two from being our starter. It doesn't make sense to bring in new goaltenders
          12 mai 2017 à 20 h 58
          #5
          Démarrer sujet
          CGY
          Avatar de l'utilisateur
          Rejoint: déc. 2015
          Messages: 5,551
          Mentions "j'aime": 2,069
          Quoting: C_Craig12
          Gillies is only a year or two from being our starter. It doesn't make sense to bring in new goaltenders


          I agree that Gillies is close, but when the time comes it would give the flames the luxury of having valuable young goalies that could be traded to fill a need on the roster.

          I also don't think Elliott will be brought back primarily because then they lose the 2018 3rd round pick. However I think Johnson may be back for sure.
          12 mai 2017 à 22 h 56
          #6
          Avatar de l'utilisateur
          Rejoint: mai 2017
          Messages: 82
          Mentions "j'aime": 8
          At least 1 of Gillies/Korpisalo/Gruabuer will step up. Never hurts to have multiple goaltenders. Especially in a long season. Just look at how it's helped PIT this year. Even ANA has benefited having Gibson and Bernier. Decent idea. Not sure if anything like it will happen but ya never know.
           
          Répondre
          To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
          Question:
          Options:
          Ajouter une option
          Soumettre le sondage