VAN would want a young top 4 RHD if they end up moving Boeser. Also, Boeser only signs that contract with VAN.

ll take that trade.

Branstrom really is a top 4 D, it is the coaches problem why he doesn;t get the minutes in OTT,

This feels like the deluxe version of the commonly accepted 64OA + JBD for Garland

Canucks don’t need a d man like Brannstrom

I'm working on my own analysis of Boeser's trade value and what a mock trade might look like. Boeser has better career stats than Fiala, but Fiala's is better than Boeser in the last 3 years. So, while Fiala's stock has been going up, Boeser's down. Minnesota was in a worse position than Van, and Van can always choose just to trade Miller if they have to sell low on Boeser. So, I think while Fiala has more trade value than Boeser (will lead to Boeser signing for less than Fiala), he will return a bit more than Fiala did even if it's by a little and less than what DeBrincat would return.

Well Boeser just signed a 3 year contract with Vancouver

Just noticed now after writing a ton of stuff lol, was just about to start making Mock trades. Then I noticed his new contract lol.

Well we can all fantasize. I think Garland is more likely to move now

Your probably right, but if Garland gets traded Ima flip shi-