SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Keeping Gaudreau

Créé par: fatkidinc
Équipe: 2022-23 Flames de Calgary
Date de création initiale: 18 juin 2022
Publié: 18 juin 2022
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
One of Johnny or Matty as well as Toffoli will have to go to make the money work. Sandin has to be included in the trade because after taking Tkachuk who will probably sign for about 9 mil, theres no way the leafs can sign Sandin
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
44 000 000 $
44 000 000 $
1800 000 $
32 500 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
79 500 000 $
21 000 000 $
31 500 000 $
1750 000 $
22 000 000 $
Transactions
1.
2.
CGY
  1. Choix de 2e ronde en 2022 (BOS)
  2. Choix de 3e ronde en 2022 (CGY)
  3. Choix de 3e ronde en 2023 (BOS)
Rachats de contrats
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2022
Logo de CGY
Logo de BOS
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
2023
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de BOS
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
2024
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2182 500 000 $73 249 866 $0 $0 $9 250 134 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Flames de Calgary
9 500 000 $9 500 000 $
AG
UFA - 7
Logo de Flames de Calgary
4 850 000 $4 850 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
6 962 366 $6 962 366 $
AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Flames de Calgary
4 000 000 $4 000 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 3
Logo de Flames de Calgary
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
AD, C, AG
UFA - 4
Logo de Flames de Calgary
2 300 000 $2 300 000 $
AG, AD, C
RFA - 2
Logo de Flames de Calgary
4 900 000 $4 900 000 $
AD, AG
NTC
UFA - 5
Logo de Flames de Calgary
5 350 000 $5 350 000 $
C
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Flames de Calgary
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
AD, C
UFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
5 250 000 $5 250 000 $
AG, AD
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
800 000 $800 000 $
AG, C
UFA - 2
Logo de Flames de Calgary
750 000 $750 000 $
AD, C
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Flames de Calgary
1 237 500 $1 237 500 $
DG
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Flames de Calgary
4 550 000 $4 550 000 $
DD
UFA - 4
Logo de Flames de Calgary
6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
G
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo de Flames de Calgary
4 000 000 $4 000 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 2
Logo de Flames de Calgary
1 125 000 $1 125 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Flames de Calgary
750 000 $750 000 $
G
UFA - 1
2 500 000 $2 500 000 $
DG
UFA - 2
Logo de Flames de Calgary
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
DD
UFA - 4
Logo de Flames de Calgary
1 550 000 $1 550 000 $
DG
RFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
18 juin 2022 à 19 h 28
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2019
Messages: 2,088
Mentions "j'aime": 686
Both those trades are terrible for calgary
18 juin 2022 à 19 h 50
#2
LongtimeLeafsufferer
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2015
Messages: 59,550
Mentions "j'aime": 22,691
Quoting: flamesfan
Both those trades are terrible for calgary


No, it's bad for Toronto. Leafs can't afford the difference in Nylander and Tkachuk's cap, and that's a lot to give up for one year of Tkachuk.
18 juin 2022 à 19 h 58
#3
Démarrer sujet
YT
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2021
Messages: 29
Mentions "j'aime": 7
If Tkachuk signs a 9x8 it will work for toronto because in this deal they give up Sandin as well. I made an ACGM draft of this trade from torontos end and it works just fine
18 juin 2022 à 20 h 1
#4
Démarrer sujet
YT
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2021
Messages: 29
Mentions "j'aime": 7
Quoting: flamesfan
Both those trades are terrible for calgary


I thought the value was pretty spot on for the Tkachuk trade, and Cgy leaves some value on the table with toffoli cause they're over the cap before that trade and teams know that he NEEDS to be traded, so they lose leverage
18 juin 2022 à 21 h 17
#5
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 38,340
Mentions "j'aime": 19,566
Quoting: palhal
No, it's bad for Toronto. Leafs can't afford the difference in Nylander and Tkachuk's cap, and that's a lot to give up for one year of Tkachuk.


Lol just because you think it's bad for Toronto doesn't change the fact that it's crap for Calgary. The gap between Tkachuk and Nylander is massive
18 juin 2022 à 21 h 49
#6
LongtimeLeafsufferer
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2015
Messages: 59,550
Mentions "j'aime": 22,691
Quoting: Ledge_And_Dairy
Lol just because you think it's bad for Toronto doesn't change the fact that it's crap for Calgary. The gap between Tkachuk and Nylander is massive


Maybe, but the cap between Tkachuk is 2m, Nylander has one more year of control and the post wanted the Leafs first. Sounds like you know Tkachuk isn't signing long term with Calgary.
18 juin 2022 à 21 h 53
#7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 38,340
Mentions "j'aime": 19,566
Quoting: palhal
Maybe, but the cap between Tkachuk is 2m, Nylander has one more year of control and the post wanted the Leafs first. Sounds like you know Tkachuk isn't signing long term with Calgary.


Nobody would ever trade for Tkachuk on the basis of only signing him for 1 year. Your entire argument is flawed right from the start.

I am very confident that Tkachuk does sign long term with Calgary actually. I was merely speaking hypothetically to appease the pessimistic people posting in this thread
18 juin 2022 à 21 h 59
#8
LongtimeLeafsufferer
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2015
Messages: 59,550
Mentions "j'aime": 22,691
Quoting: Ledge_And_Dairy
Nobody would ever trade for Tkachuk on the basis of only signing him for 1 year. Your entire argument is flawed right from the start.

I am very confident that Tkachuk does sign long term with Calgary actually. I was merely speaking hypothetically to appease the pessimistic people posting in this thread


Well no one is going to trade for Tkachuk unless he has signed contract, so the only way that really gets done, if Calgary gives permission for him to negotiate with other teams.
I don't think people are being pessimistic at all....it's reality. Teams can spend their cap on good UFAs without giving good inexpensive young assets by trading for a RFA...or even a signed RFA.
18 juin 2022 à 22 h 46
#9
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 38,340
Mentions "j'aime": 19,566
Quoting: palhal
Well no one is going to trade for Tkachuk unless he has signed contract, so the only way that really gets done, if Calgary gives permission for him to negotiate with other teams.
I don't think people are being pessimistic at all....it's reality. Teams can spend their cap on good UFAs without giving good inexpensive young assets by trading for a RFA...or even a signed RFA.


What? Teams trade for RFA's all the time. If Calgary does consider trading Tkachuk's rights they will certainly give any interested team (which should be every team in the league) permission to talk with his agent.
19 juin 2022 à 0 h 50
#10
LongtimeLeafsufferer
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2015
Messages: 59,550
Mentions "j'aime": 22,691
Quoting: Ledge_And_Dairy
What? Teams trade for RFA's all the time. If Calgary does consider trading Tkachuk's rights they will certainly give any interested team (which should be every team in the league) permission to talk with his agent.


True teams trade RFAs. But fewer RFAs with one year remaining till UFA status are traded....for a lot. And even few if any with a 9m QO . Talking to an agent doesn't mean that much.....talking to the agent and signing a longer term extension is important
19 juin 2022 à 2 h 14
#11
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 38,340
Mentions "j'aime": 19,566
Quoting: palhal
True teams trade RFAs. But fewer RFAs with one year remaining till UFA status are traded....for a lot. And even few if any with a 9m QO . Talking to an agent doesn't mean that much.....talking to the agent and signing a longer term extension is important


So you genuinely expect he would return less than Jones? If so I have nothing left to say to you until after he signs a long term deal with the Flames because it's pretty much all but announced
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage