SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Next Season v5 Optimal

Créé par: Greed
Équipe: 2022-23 Oilers d'Edmonton
Date de création initiale: 13 juin 2022
Publié: 13 juin 2022
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
Salary cap reflects the money we would receive in the cap recapture if Keith Retires.

This roster reflects what I think would be the best case scenario if both Keith and Smith retire. Kane resigns at 6 mil in a bit of a discount just so he can play with McDavid again. Kulak is rumored to come back at 2 mil per. Kuzmenko would sign at the maximum possible and be a sniper for Draisaitl to pass too. Puljujarvi would accept a 1 year qualifying offer and get the most opportunity to play with McDavid and inflate his numbers for next year. The going rate for 20 goal scorers seems to be around 3-4 mil, so that's what I gave Yamamoto. McLeod gets a bridge deal. Lybushkin could also be Gudbranson as well, just any RD that plays defense. Perhaps a trade for Hakanpaa using Kassian would work as well, but i was trying to avoid trades as much as possible. Trade would send us Gibson for a 1st, 3rd, and Barrie. I think Anaheim would be interested in Barrie, but if not we can include a prospect instead (Lavoie?).

I feel as though this roster is extremely likely to exist so long as Keith and Smith retire. Only one trade being made, and the contracts all seem relatively reasonable, give or take a couple 100k here or there. Goaltending wise it moves the needle forward massively, and hopefully the defense is an improvement as well. Forward core seems relatively the same.
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
21 500 000 $
11 500 000 $
43 000 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
22 000 000 $
32 000 000 $
56 000 000 $
CRÉÉANSCAP HIT
Kuzmenko, Andrei
1925 000 $
Transactions
ANA
  1. Barrie, Tyson
  2. Choix de 1e ronde en 2022 (EDM)
  3. Choix de 3e ronde en 2023 (EDM)
Rachats de contrats
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2022
Logo de EDM
Logo de EDM
Logo de EDM
2023
Logo de EDM
Logo de EDM
Logo de EDM
Logo de EDM
Logo de EDM
2024
Logo de EDM
Logo de EDM
Logo de EDM
Logo de EDM
Logo de EDM
Logo de EDM
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2385 900 000 $84 726 833 $896 000 $2 200 000 $1 173 167 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 4
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
12 500 000 $12 500 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
AD
UFA - 1
Kuzmenko, Andrei
925 000 $925 000 $
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
8 500 000 $8 500 000 $
C, AG
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 3
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
AD
RFA - 2
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
5 500 000 $5 500 000 $
AD, AG
NMC
UFA - 6
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
5 125 000 $5 125 000 $
AG, C
NMC
UFA - 7
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance500 000 $$500K)
AG, C
RFA - 2
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
1 250 000 $1 250 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
2 750 000 $2 750 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
C
RFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
9 250 000 $9 250 000 $
DG
NMC
UFA - 8
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
DD
RFA - 1
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
6 400 000 $6 400 000 $
G
M-NTC
UFA - 5
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
DG
RFA - 2
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
3 250 000 $3 250 000 $
DD
UFA - 3
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
750 000 $750 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 4
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
DD
UFA - 2
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
850 000 $850 000 $
AG, C, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
5 538 462 $5 538 462 $
DG
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
3 200 000 $3 200 000 $
AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
2 200 000 $2 200 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
762 500 $762 500 $
DG
UFA - 2
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
4 167 000 $4 167 000 $
DG
M-NTC
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
13 juin 2022 à 8 h 7
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2017
Messages: 24,124
Mentions "j'aime": 7,781
Quoting: Greed
Goaltending wise it moves the needle forward massively

Wrong. Gibson hasn't been elite since 2018. Even Mike Smith has been better recently.
13 juin 2022 à 8 h 15
#2
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2020
Messages: 103
Mentions "j'aime": 3
Quoting: CD282
Wrong. Gibson hasn't been elite since 2018. Even Mike Smith has been better recently.


I would say that the team surrounding Gibson has also been pretty poor the last few years as well. I think on the Oilers (new environment, stronger team in front of him) he would perform better than Mike Smith has. In addition, I think Skinner performed better than both Smith and Koskinen this year (Smaller sample size being the asterisk).
13 juin 2022 à 8 h 39
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2021
Messages: 15,768
Mentions "j'aime": 12,146
Barrie doesn’t have any value to Anaheim since we already have Drysdale and Shatty
13 juin 2022 à 8 h 40
#4
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2017
Messages: 24,124
Mentions "j'aime": 7,781
Quoting: Greed
I would say that the team surrounding Gibson has also been pretty poor the last few years as well.

The excuses never end with Gibson. Does he have incriminating photos of you too? You don't have to look any farther than GSAx or the fact that his backups usually outperform him to realize that Gibson is a part of the problem in Anaheim. He's just not as good as his reputation, full stop.

Quoting: Greed
I think on the Oilers (new environment, stronger team in front of him) he would perform better than Mike Smith has.

Where's your evidence for this? Because I don't see any, anywhere.

Quoting: Greed
In addition, I think Skinner performed better than both Smith and Koskinen this year (Smaller sample size being the asterisk).

Skinner did not perform better than healthy Mike Smith. Smith was .915 this season, Skinner was .913. In terms of GSAx, Smith was +0.281/60 while Skinner was +0.074/60.

Skinner did outperform Koskinen by these metrics, although in a smaller sample size as you mentioned.
13 juin 2022 à 8 h 42
#5
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2020
Messages: 8,634
Mentions "j'aime": 3,931
I worry about how much spent here. The following season won't have that extra cap Keith provided so even if the cap goes up another million still less than what have here and bouch and jp and skinner are three guys I'd rather not be completely strapped going into. I get there is ways to work it in but went down a very challenging path. I don't hate this Gibson do think he can be much better here but I want to see skinner given a chance to run with it before making a significant investment.
13 juin 2022 à 10 h 6
#6
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2022
Messages: 44
Mentions "j'aime": 7
Quoting: Timmah007
I worry about how much spent here. The following season won't have that extra cap Keith provided so even if the cap goes up another million still less than what have here and bouch and jp and skinner are three guys I'd rather not be completely strapped going into. I get there is ways to work it in but went down a very challenging path. I don't hate this Gibson do think he can be much better here but I want to see skinner given a chance to run with it before making a significant investment.


the 3.4m saved in keith cap next year only, is actually close to the cap relief of sekera and lucic coming off the books in 2023 at 2.25m. combine that with the increase in cap and the fact that contracts like derek Ryan is off the books it should be okay.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage