SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Rebuild

Créé par: OldRedFox
Équipe: 2016-17 Canucks de Vancouver
Date de création initiale: 4 mai 2017
Publié: 4 mai 2017
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
The Canucks need to maximize their assets. The most valuable asset is Tanev, and as such they should explore trade options. Tanev being a right handed D-man with a very reasonable contract and term remaining should command a very good return. The Canucks should look to acquire at least a prospect and a pick, if not more. Trading him for less makes no sense.

Toronto seems like a great fit, but their stated commitment to their 5 year plan makes a trade unlikely. Tampa and Buffalo seem like good fits as well, but I think Tanev may also appeal to Columbus. Torts values Tanev, and he would fit very well into their roster.

Edler is another asset that should be moved, but his NTC does present problems. I think Edler may waive his NTC to go to Tampa ( not a good fit ) or Carolina. Neither are hockey hotbeds, and that may appeal to him. Carolina has a need for a LD and forward, I believe they are a good matchup.
Transactions
1.
VAN
  1. McKeown, Roland
  2. Choix de 1e ronde en 2017 (CAR)
CAR
  1. Edler, Alexander
  2. Granlund, Markus
2.
VAN
    Expansion Draft selection
    VGK
    1. Boucher, Reid
    3.
    VAN
    1. Carlsson, Gabriel
    2. Dubois, Pierre-Luc
    3. Hartnell, Scott
    CBJ
    1. Chaput, Michael
    2. Tanev, Christopher
    Rachats de contrats
    Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
    Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
    2017
    Logo de VAN
    Logo de CAR
    Logo de VAN
    Logo de VAN
    Logo de VAN
    Logo de SJS
    Logo de VAN
    2018
    Logo de VAN
    Logo de VAN
    Logo de VAN
    Logo de VAN
    Logo de VAN
    Logo de VAN
    Logo de VAN
    2019
    Logo de VAN
    Logo de VAN
    Logo de VAN
    Logo de VAN
    Logo de VAN
    Logo de VAN
    Logo de VAN
    TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
    2673 000 000 $63 071 583 $315 000 $1 220 000 $9 928 417 $
    Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
    Sedin, Daniel
    7 000 000 $7 000 000 $
    AG
    NMC
    UFA - 2
    Sedin, Henrik
    7 000 000 $7 000 000 $
    C
    NMC
    UFA - 2
    Eriksson, Loui
    6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
    AG, AD
    NMC
    UFA - 6
    Baertschi, Sven
    1 850 000 $1 850 000 $
    AG
    UFA - 2
    Sutter, Brandon
    4 375 000 $4 375 000 $
    AD, C
    NTC
    UFA - 5
    Dorsett, Derek
    2 650 000 $2 650 000 $
    AD
    UFA - 3
    Exempté du ballottageMolino, Griffen
    925 000 $925 000 $
    C
    UFA - 2
    Rödin, Anton
    950 000 $950 000 $
    AD
    UFA - 1
    Boeser, Brock
    925 000 $925 000 $
    AD
    UFA - 3
    Dubois, Pierre-Luc
    925 000 $925 000 $
    C
    UFA - 4
    Horvat, Bo
    894 167 $894 167 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
    C
    UFA - 1
    Skille, Jack
    700 000 $700 000 $
    AD
    UFA - 1
    Hartnell, Scott
    4 750 000 $4 750 000 $
    AG
    NMC
    UFA - 3
    Gaunce, Brendan
    863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance162 500 $$162K)
    AG, C
    UFA - 1
    Cramarossa, Joseph
    724 500 $724 500 $
    C
    UFA - 1
    Megna, Jayson
    600 000 $600 000 $
    C, AG, AD
    UFA - 1
    Shore, Drew
    600 000 $600 000 $
    C
    UFA - 1
    Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
    Miller, Ryan
    6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
    G
    M-NTC
    UFA - 1
    Sbisa, Luca
    3 600 000 $3 600 000 $
    DG
    UFA - 2
    Gudbranson, Erik
    3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
    DD
    UFA - 1
    Markström, Jacob
    1 550 000 $1 550 000 $
    G
    UFA - 1
    Hutton, Ben
    896 250 $896 250 $
    DG
    UFA - 1
    Stecher, Troy
    925 000 $925 000 $
    DD
    UFA - 2
    McKeown, Roland
    745 000 $745 000 $ (Bonis de performance207 500 $$208K)
    DD
    UFA - 3
    Biega, Alex
    750 000 $750 000 $
    DD
    UFA - 2
    Carlsson, Gabriel
    925 000 $925 000 $
    DG
    UFA - 4

    Code d'intégration

    • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
    • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

    Texte intégré

    Cliquer pour surligner
    4 mai 2017 à 22 h 11
    #1
    BurnEmUp
    Yeah Baby
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: mai 2015
    Messages: 1,370
    Mentions "j'aime": 322
    I hope Tanev is traded this off season so we can see what type of return he really nets. A lot of Canuck fans seem to be over valuing him big time in my opinion. He's a solid defensive Dman with good mobility, but he brings almost no offense and a steady stream of injuries.

    I'd love to have him on the Flames as Brodie's partner on the 2nd pair, but wouldn't give up much more than the 16/17th overall in the upcoming draft.

    Like I say, hopefully we find out.
    4 mai 2017 à 22 h 31
    #2
    Watty1
    Watty1
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: déc. 2015
    Messages: 1,280
    Mentions "j'aime": 58
    Quoting: BurnEmUp
    I hope Tanev is traded this off season so we can see what type of return he really nets. A lot of Canuck fans seem to be over valuing him big time in my opinion. He's a solid defensive Dman with good mobility, but he brings almost no offense and a steady stream of injuries.

    I'd love to have him on the Flames as Brodie's partner on the 2nd pair, but wouldn't give up much more than the 16/17th overall in the upcoming draft.

    Like I say, hopefully we find out.
    4 mai 2017 à 23 h 29
    #3
    OldRedFox
    Démarrer sujet
    Canucks
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: avr. 2017
    Messages: 40
    Mentions "j'aime": 1
    The lack of higher end right handed D on the market increases his value greatly. Is he an elite D man? No. He would be a top pairing player on many teams though. The contract and term remaining just add more value. Throw in a bad contract coming back and you up the value again. A 16/17 overall is a crapshoot (especially in this draft) and on its own wouldn't make any sense. While the Canucks SHOULD trade Tanev, they can only make the deal if they get excellent value. It is a sellers market and they need to get top dollar.
    5 mai 2017 à 11 h 53
    #4
    JMK48
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: mars 2016
    Messages: 439
    Mentions "j'aime": 29
    A lot to give up for Columbus considering Tanev would be a second pairing.
    5 mai 2017 à 13 h 18
    #5
    OldRedFox
    Démarrer sujet
    Canucks
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: avr. 2017
    Messages: 40
    Mentions "j'aime": 1
    They get will have one of the deepest D corps in the East, they get rid of a contract they have been trying to move for over a year, nothing comes off their roster, no more draft picks lost and they have the depth to make this trade. Added bonus : Tanev does not go to Tampa or Toronto.
    5 mai 2017 à 13 h 31
    #6
    BurnEmUp
    Yeah Baby
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: mai 2015
    Messages: 1,370
    Mentions "j'aime": 322
    Columbus doesn't need Tanev.

    They already have two right shot Dmen that are not only younger than Tanev, but better. Why give up two solid prosects for a $4.5 million 3rd pairing Dman (which is what he'd be on that team behind Jones and Savard)
     
    Répondre
    To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
    Question:
    Options:
    Ajouter une option
    Soumettre le sondage