SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Following Arizonas route

Créé par: Angusc
Équipe: 2022-23 Canucks de Vancouver
Date de création initiale: 29 mai 2022
Publié: 29 mai 2022
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
Last season, Arizona took on bad or expiring contracts from other teams to get more picks and prospects. This thread will be similar to what they had done.

Since a thread brought up a Lucic trade, I will have to repeat for getting the 2nd rounder since we are also getting Monahan in return which can achieve 2 things in a single action for Calgary.

Some of the other trades were for other more cap teams to help hit the cap floor although the returns may not be great. Another one of these trades is if Boeser leaves due to wanting a big contract that is too much for Allvin.

Note, I know some of these trades will not happen due to overpayments or doesnt fit team needs, but this thread is mainly hypothetical. Originally, I put in Dermott to the Hawks for a 4th, but I scrapped that idea since that return was underwhelming. Also, I put in a pick for the Sheary trade as well as a prospect in Pelletier for swapping a 3rd rounder
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
32 500 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
1850 000 $
Transactions
1.
VAN
  1. Choix de 3e ronde en 2023 (OTT)
2.
VAN
  1. Dumoulin, Brian
  2. Marino, John
  3. Poulin, Samuel
  4. Choix de 1e ronde en 2022 (PIT)
  5. Choix de 2e ronde en 2023 (PIT)
Détails additionnels:
Conditional 2nd that transfers to a 2024 unprotected 1st if the pick is at a certain number range.
PIT
  1. Miller, J.T. (2 625 000 $ retained)
3.
VAN
  1. Walsh, Reilly
  2. Zacha, Pavel [Droits de RFA]
  3. Choix de 2e ronde en 2022 (NJD)
  4. Choix de 3e ronde en 2023 (NJD)
NJD
  1. Boeser, Brock [Droits de RFA]
4.
5.
VAN
  1. Sheary, Conor
  2. Choix de 3e ronde en 2024 (WSH)
WSH
  1. Choix de 5e ronde en 2023 (VAN)
6.
VAN
  1. Lucic, Milan
  2. Monahan, Sean
  3. Pelletier, Jakob
  4. Choix de 2e ronde en 2023 (CGY)
CGY
  1. Dickinson, Jason
  2. Choix de 6e ronde en 2022 (VAN)
7.
VAN
  1. Choix de 6e ronde en 2022 (BUF)
Détails additionnels:
Originally future considerations
Rachats de contrats
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2022
Logo de VAN
Logo de PIT
Logo de NJD
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de BUF
Logo de VAN
2023
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de PIT
Logo de CGY
Logo de VAN
Logo de OTT
Logo de NJD
Logo de VAN
Logo de NYR
Logo de VAN
2024
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de WSH
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2182 500 000 $79 098 750 $1 250 000 $1 232 500 $3 401 250 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
4 950 000 $4 950 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 4
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
7 350 000 $7 350 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Capitals de Washington
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
891 667 $891 667 $ (Bonis de performance300 000 $$300K)
AG, AD
RFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
4 125 000 $4 125 000 $
C
UFA - 1
Logo de Flyers de Philadelphie
7 000 000 $7 000 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
2 500 000 $2 500 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
AD, AG
RFA - 2
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
883 750 $883 750 $ (Bonis de performance82 500 $$82K)
AD
RFA - 2
850 000 $850 000 $
AD, C
UFA - 3
Logo de Flames de Calgary
5 250 000 $5 250 000 $
AG, AD
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
863 333 $863 333 $
AG
RFA - 2
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
7 850 000 $7 850 000 $
DG
UFA - 5
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
4 400 000 $4 400 000 $
DD
UFA - 5
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
G
UFA - 4
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
7 260 000 $7 260 000 $
DG
NMC
UFA - 5
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
762 500 $762 500 $
G
UFA - 2
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
4 100 000 $4 100 000 $
DG
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
850 000 $850 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
750 000 $750 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
2 500 000 $2 500 000 $
DD
UFA - 3
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
AG, AD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
762 500 $762 500 $
DD
UFA - 1
Équipe de réserve
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
750 000 $750 000 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
C, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
816 667 $816 667 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
AG
RFA - 3
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
863 333 $863 333 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
C, AG
RFA - 2
Logo de Devils du New Jersey
925 000 $925 000 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
DD
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
29 mai 2022 à 16 h 54
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2021
Messages: 450
Mentions "j'aime": 181
huh. this nakes zero sense. you trade dermott for a 4th when worth a 3rd. you trade brock boeser for litterally nothing. zacha=3rdliner rielly=fringetop4dman and the picks are nice but the players. just keep boeser. conor sheary, why? we get no picks or players back. GGY trade is fine but add a prospect instead of the third
Angusc a aimé ceci.
29 mai 2022 à 17 h 32
#2
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2020
Messages: 708
Mentions "j'aime": 236
OTT declines
Miller trade actually makes sense
CHI easily accepts, why would Vancouver do that
Van does not get enough for boeser
phi + wsh says no
for 11+ Mil in cap relief to CGY, I hope they have a little more to give van for that
buf says no
29 mai 2022 à 18 h 26
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2022
Messages: 32
Mentions "j'aime": 18
Why would the Canucks do this? They’re not a terrible team and have a decent core no reason to be a contract graveyard, status quo for a year and then transform your roster. No reason to trade Boeser for that
29 mai 2022 à 18 h 34
#4
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2022
Messages: 610
Mentions "j'aime": 231
Quoting: nucksfan40
huh. this nakes zero sense. you trade dermott for a 4th when worth a 3rd. you trade brock boeser for litterally nothing. zacha=3rdliner rielly=fringetop4dman and the picks are nice but the players. just keep boeser. conor sheary, why? we get no picks or players back. GGY trade is fine but add a prospect instead of the third


Now that I think about it, that is true for the Dermott trade. Originally, I was going to put Lars Eller instead of Sheary and would give us a higher return, but Sheary is the cheaper one.

I know that Boeser will most likely be staying in Vancouver, but I was having trouble thinking about what good enough of a return he is based on value. I was thinking about adding Severson, but he will most likely be off limits, so I put in the high picks and prospects.

For the Flames, not sure which player we should get. I don't think we can get Pelletier etc.
29 mai 2022 à 18 h 41
#5
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2022
Messages: 610
Mentions "j'aime": 231
Quoting: Ghostface
Why would the Canucks do this? They’re not a terrible team and have a decent core no reason to be a contract graveyard, status quo for a year and then transform your roster. No reason to trade Boeser for that


Its obviously not happening since its a hypothetical thread. But I was basing it on when JR said that this is not a playoff team during one of his interviews. So if that was the case, then this would be moves for the long term.
29 mai 2022 à 20 h 42
#6
Craig Laughlin Fan
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2019
Messages: 5,320
Mentions "j'aime": 5,746
Modifié 30 mai 2022 à 11 h 12
So in this situation, Washington trades one of their best value contracts and a 40 point 3rd liner in Sheary as a dump even though they don’t need space, and they get a 5th?

Not happening.

Were you possibly thinking of Carl Hagelin? While there are different reasons that Washington wouldn’t need to dump him (possible career ending eye injury), it would make more sense.
Kalopsia a aimé ceci.
30 mai 2022 à 14 h 17
#7
Do it now!
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2022
Messages: 823
Mentions "j'aime": 156
Oh look, another "Please trade us Marino" Vancouver AGM.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage