Why is Muzzin waiving his NTC for NJ? Clown 🤡 offer for Patrick Kane. He might be 33 years old but he scored 92 points this season. Hawks aren't giving him away. It'll take a 2nd and a 4th to dump Mrazek. Just buy him out.

“For Fun”. You need to chill. Maybe he is a clown. Maybe he’s a banker. Either way, chill man.

The whole point of CFACGM is to create hockey discussion. Did I lie about Patrick Kane having 92 points? Disagreeing is not against the rules so there's no need for me to "chill."

FTR I called his trade a "clown trade." I didn't call him a clown. So stop lying. Maybe you should "chill."

unfortunately ppl here on armchair gm are too serious and would freak out at any satire post

Unfortunately ppl here on CFACGM are insecure malcontents with low self esteem and like to pile on even though it has nothing to do with them.

I don't think MoreHitz replied badly to this post at all. Most posters replying to this would have said a lot worse, mainly because every trade proposal is slanted so heavily in Toronto's favour. Consideration should be given to the fact that jal just became a member a couple of days ago. Just a suggestion I would throw out, when proposing trades you should look at it from the other team's perspective as well to see if it makes any sense at all to them. For example, Arizona would probably have zero interest in Mrazek, not only is he considered a cap dump, and compensation to take him is very little in this proposal, but he also has a 10 team NTC, and his actual salary for the next couple years is greater than his cap hit, which is not something Arizona prefers as they deal with a cash flow issue from having to play in a small arena. If you can do this analysis from the other team's point of view, you should be able to offer trade proposals superior to about 90% of the rest of the cap friendly posters on here. Enjoy the site and don't take anything personally, most hockey fans are passionate about their sport and about the team they root for.

The only reason why these guy's had a problem with my comments is because I'm a Red Wings fan disagreeing with a Leafs fan in a Leafs CFACGM. If I were a Leafs fan no one would have any problem with what I said.

Again. Disagreeing with someone is not against the rules.

Nit sure why they would get Giroux to allow for Tavares to play on the wing, when Giroux himself is already starting to play wing. Would be better off converting Nylander back to a C and playing Giroux on line3 as the RW. Then you benefit from both Tavares and Giroux's faceoff skills.

Realistically, N Robertson hasn't proven what he ca do in the NHL so Kane can probably get a better package going to NYR. Maybe Kane is a deadline acquisition and they don't get a better offer but I don't see him waiving for TOR anyways. So you would still have the cap to sign a center like Kadri and can keep Nylander on the wing.