1 | | - | | Another guy sent to the graveyard. |
2 | | - | | Would Chicago like it better to give a top 5 pick this year or an unprotected 2023? Toews isn't getting any younger and rumours of Dach not being the most coachable makes it a need on the long run to bolster that center depth so they don't overthink it. |
3 | | - | | As a Habs fan I'm not thrilled about this bs of dropping 3 spots but whatever, but at 3 I'd get Nemec althought I'd be opening all phones lines and take offers for this pick. Yes Nemec seems like a good pick but if I get a team desperate enough to give me great value on a weaker top end draft year like this one well deal done. If let's say Kevyn Adams' really excited by his team, wants his guy at 3 and he's willing to part ways with his early's picks plus like an early 23 2nd well who am I to judge. (Taking the "TheAthletic" chart that's a slight overpayment but nothing outrageous) |
4 | | - | | Curveball on this one, there's a premium on top end right defenders and with Jiricek you're locking up a guy that will likely become one and be a foundation to your team. I'm sure the Wings are feeling pretty good today picking Seider. For Seattle I think it's easier to find a second line scoring winger, instead of picking Slafkovsky here, deeper in this draft so they go for the premium position. |
5 | | - | | Philly isn't looking to be a bottom feeder for long so taking the most NHL ready prospect here makes sense. Slaf's playing against man, is already built like one and has the easiest path to the NHL. |
6 | | - | | Young team, with no gapping hole in the pipeline so they go BPA. |
7 | | - | | Ottawa's made questionable picks at times lately (Boucher at 10 and trading up for Kleven were part of it) so I'm just giving them a questionable pick this time again. Lambert isn't as bad as advertised but he's a project. |
8 | | - | | The connection is too easy but I feel like Yzerman has a trick up his sleeve for this one. |
9 | | - | | First of many picks, just go somewhat BPA here Buff. |
10 | | - | | Matheychuk has great IQ on the ice and is the new-age offensive defenceman, he'll get his name called earlier than people think. |
11 | | - | | I'm not in love with Kemell but San Jose needs long term help down the wings cause Timo can't do everything by himself for the next 10 years. |
12 | | - | | Mesar brings top-six potential with ample room for growth, maybe not their biggest need but hitting for the fence on this one. |
13 | | - | | High motor, 200 foot player that I have a sweet spot for (Think Podkolzin). Mid-term Isles need replacements on the wings with 6 of their 8 starters being on the other side of 30. |
14 | | - | | Hit the floor with this pick, he's not sexy but he's gonna wear a Jets jersey at some point. If he opens up his scoring he's surefire top 6. I'd be taking a strong look at Pickering here too. |
15 | | - | | The Nucks have a very capable offense but are starting to get older on that right side of the defense and are pretty thin at this position prospect wise. Getting Nelson could relieve some pressure off Hugues and Vancouver could get their future PP2 quaterback. |
16 | | | | You're set at defense for a while so keep building up that front and take BPA. |
17 | | - | | Nashville just has a knack with defenders and always end up with a potent NHLer, keep building by the back and trade away aging assets. |
18 | | - | | Wanted to take Yurov here but Dallas simply never draft Russians so you get Pickering. Long term project but he could come out as the best defender in this draft. |
19 | | - | | Need to work on his edge and defensive game but has tons of skills. |
20 | | - | | Russian. BPA. Washington. That's it. |
21 | | - | | Pitts needs to start thinking to the after ''My top three centers are now retired'' timeline, pick them often and early. Long term project with the biggest upside here at 21. |
22 | | - | | Skilled, creative, strong puck mover. Edmonton could land a better, cheaper and younger replacement for Barrie. |
23 | | | | Already a great prospect pool so let's double dip in the WHL and get a raw talent that can score. |
24 | | - | | Had a hard time looking who fits better here without being a reach. Luneau or Chesley would be on my radar here to prepare the ''after Faulk'', instead I go for a jack of all trade that plays with great pace. |
25 | | - | | Tampa hasn't drafted much early in the drafts lately and therefore have a weaker pipeline than most, grab a two-way defender with great vision. |
26 | | - | | Forward core's young and locked, backend's young and locked, goaltending's young and locked. Grab a first round faller with flaws and hope he pans out on the long term to become a middle six center for you. |
27 | | | | I see Kasper going lower than most because of the lack of offensive upside but Montreal gets a responsible gritty center. Not an exciting pick but he's one of the most likely to hit the NHL at this spot. |
28 | | - | | Another one very likely to hit the NHL, Chesley has all the tool to become a capable top four guy in today's NHL. IQ, vision, possession, he's got it all. |
29 | | - | | A recent riser with Kulich here, long term swiss army knife picked at the bottom of the first. |
30 | | | | Big from the back to the front Arizona, after securing Wright and the impending departure of Jakob they bring up company to support that defense alongside Soderstrom. |
31 | | | | Same as above. |
32 | | | | Why not. |