SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

My TDL

Créé par: Gauldy98
Équipe: 2021-22 Ducks d'Anaheim
Date de création initiale: 9 mars 2022
Publié: 9 mars 2022
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
Lindholm probably fetches more. I just went with Tippett and a 2nd. Feel free to criticize.
By trading Manson, and trading the other assets, I think its important for the Ducks to acquire a right handed shot d-man (Lundkvist) since all we have is Drysdale (Shatty is gone after next season).

If Manson is willing to extend for 1 year, to prove himself healthy, I would do it unless a team is offering a 1st round pick.

Sam Steel has been playing well, Max Comtois deserves more of an opportunity, and Max Jones is returning soon. So the Rakell and D-Lo trade are necessary, not just because they are UFA's. If Steel, Comtois, and Jones play well down the stretch, then and only then would I consider moving Henrique in the offseason. I think its vital that Terry plays with someone like Henrique.
Transactions
1.
ANA
  1. Tippett, Owen
  2. Choix de 2e ronde en 2023 (FLA)
2.
ANA
  1. Lundkvist, Nils
  2. Choix de 2e ronde en 2022 (NYR)
Détails additionnels:
Not sure what round the draft pick should be. I lean on it being a 2nd. If need be, retain some salary.
3.
ANA
  1. Choix de 1e ronde en 2022 (TOR)
TOR
  1. Manson, Josh (2 050 000 $ retained)
  2. Choix de 5e ronde en 2022 (TOR)
Détails additionnels:
Manson alone does not fetch a 1st. He's been injured half the season. I figured to retain salary and add a 5th, and the fact that Toronto SHOULD have a very late 1st round pick, seems fair. If not, add Sam Carrick.
Rachats de contrats
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Enfoui
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2022
Logo de ANA
Logo de TOR
Logo de ANA
Logo de NYR
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de NSH
2023
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de FLA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
2024
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2381 500 000 $55 684 499 $0 $4 982 500 $25 815 501 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
1 700 000 $1 700 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
C, AG
RFA - 2
Logo de Panthers de la Floride
863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
1 456 250 $1 456 250 $
AG, C
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
874 125 $874 125 $
C, AG
RFA - 1
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
1 450 000 $1 450 000 $
AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
2 037 500 $2 037 500 $
AG
RFA - 2
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
874 125 $874 125 $
C, AG
RFA - 1
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
5 250 000 $5 250 000 $
AD, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
1 295 000 $1 295 000 $
AG, AD
RFA - 3
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $ (Bonis de performance1 500 000 $$2M)
C
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
750 000 $750 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
AG, C
UFA - 2
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
6 500 000 $6 500 000 $
DG/DD
M-NTC
UFA - 5
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
3 900 000 $3 900 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
6 400 000 $6 400 000 $
G
M-NTC
UFA - 6
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
DD
RFA - 2
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
950 000 $950 000 $
G
UFA - 2
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
809 166 $809 166 $ (Bonis de performance82 500 $$82K)
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Rangers de New York
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
DD
RFA - 3
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
800 000 $800 000 $
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
750 000 $750 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
750 000 $750 000 $
DG/DD
RFA - 2
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
6 875 000 $6 875 000 $
C, AD
M-NTC
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
9 mars 2022 à 11 h 54
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2022
Messages: 836
Mentions "j'aime": 371
TOR declines- unless it sets up for a bigger move.
9 mars 2022 à 11 h 58
#2
Lenny7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2017
Messages: 13,291
Mentions "j'aime": 11,051
Quoting: TML_Bias
TOR declines- unless it sets up for a bigger move.


Manson's NTC also blocks this. He's got Toronto on the list, and rumor is that he blocked a deal to Winnipeg last year.
9 mars 2022 à 11 h 59
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2021
Messages: 16,002
Mentions "j'aime": 12,323
Lindholm deal- no it needs a 1st
NYR- if Des is included needs to be a 1st
TOR- I think Tampa could be a spot that could give us a 1st and no thank you to adding Carrick in the deal
9 mars 2022 à 13 h 20
#4
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 879
Mentions "j'aime": 132
Quoting: GeneralLandro
Lindholm deal- no it needs a 1st
NYR- if Des is included needs to be a 1st
TOR- I think Tampa could be a spot that could give us a 1st and no thank you to adding Carrick in the deal


Apparently every move this year requires a 1st....for any player.
Gauldy98 a aimé ceci.
9 mars 2022 à 16 h 44
#5
Once a Kings Fan Too
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 41,044
Mentions "j'aime": 25,831
I think that you've been commendably conservative here -- extremely conservative, in some instances. (No sense in sounding like a Montreal extremist, who would say that since Manson is better than Chiarot, he should get a first and a second.) I don't think that we trade Lindholm without getting a 2022 first or second. I don't think that we need to include DesLauriers in that trade, or move him at all because I think that we want to re-sign him. (Has anyone else noticed how much he's been deployed on the penalty kill lately?)

You've been flying under the radar recently. Welcome to the cadre of hard-core Anaheim fans.
9 mars 2022 à 17 h 57
#6
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2020
Messages: 28
Mentions "j'aime": 9
Quoting: OldNYIfan
I think that you've been commendably conservative here -- extremely conservative, in some instances. (No sense in sounding like a Montreal extremist, who would say that since Manson is better than Chiarot, he should get a first and a second.) I don't think that we trade Lindholm without getting a 2022 first or second. I don't think that we need to include DesLauriers in that trade, or move him at all because I think that we want to re-sign him. (Has anyone else noticed how much he's been deployed on the penalty kill lately?)

You've been flying under the radar recently. Welcome to the cadre of hard-core Anaheim fans.


Yeah I've noticed most of the replies to my trade proposals usually end up saying Anaheim could ask for more. Not sure if its me not wanting to hear it from other fanbases, or me simply not thinking our players are all that they are hyped to be.
Adding D-lo just felt right to sell high on him. And the Rangers look like they could use a D-lo even with Reaves. Max Jones could fill in for D-lo. Buddy Robinson can take over the enforcer role. I assume we resign Carrick. Grant will be back. Groulx needs a longer look... that's 5 4th line players (Jones might jump 3rd line who knows).
The Lindholm trade, yeah its probably more like a 1st round pick and Tippett rather than a 2nd and Tippett.
The whole Manson thing is true. If Chiarot truly goes for a 1st as is the rumor, then Manson SHOULD get us a 1st...
with that being said, these players NEED to be traded if we aren't going to sign them. And a lot of these contenders already traded their 2022 1st round picks. 2023 is open for business, but some teams will be reluctant to part with 1st round picks in future years.
OldNYIfan a aimé ceci.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage