SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Pens trade Blackhawks and Canadiens

Créé par: LetsGoPens69
Équipe: 2021-22 Penguins de Pittsburgh
Date de création initiale: 3 févr. 2022
Publié: 3 févr. 2022
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Transactions
1.
2.
Rachats de contrats
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2022
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
2023
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de TOR
2024
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2381 500 000 $72 078 206 $0 $850 000 $9 421 794 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
4 500 000 $4 500 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 3
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
8 700 000 $8 700 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
950 000 $950 000 $
AG, AD, C
UFA - 1
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
9 500 000 $9 500 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
AG, C
UFA - 1
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
2 636 364 $2 636 364 $
AD, C
UFA - 1
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
1 100 000 $1 100 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
1 725 000 $1 725 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
2 200 000 $2 200 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
2 750 000 $2 750 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 4
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
4 100 000 $4 100 000 $
DG
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
7 250 000 $7 250 000 $
DD
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 1
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
G
UFA - 2
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
4 025 175 $4 025 175 $
DG
UFA - 4
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
4 400 000 $4 400 000 $
DD
UFA - 6
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
4 875 000 $4 875 000 $
DG
M-NTC
UFA - 5
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
750 000 $750 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
0 $0 $
G
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
800 000 $800 000 $
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
950 000 $950 000 $
C, AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
750 000 $750 000 $
AG, C
UFA - 1
Équipe de réserve
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
750 000 $750 000 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
750 000 $750 000 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
874 125 $874 125 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
AD, AG
RFA - 1
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
863 333 $863 333 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
C, AG
RFA - 3
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
842 500 $842 500 $ (0 $$00 $$0) (Bonis de performance82 500 $$82K)
AD, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
789 167 $789 167 $ (0 $$00 $$0) (Bonis de performance132 500 $$132K)
AD
RFA - 3
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
764 167 $764 167 $ (0 $$00 $$0) (Bonis de performance132 500 $$132K)
C
RFA - 2
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
1 150 000 $1 150 000 $ (25 000 $$25K25 000 $$25K)
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
863 333 $863 333 $ (0 $$00 $$0) (Bonis de performance212 500 $$212K)
DG
RFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
925 000 $925 000 $ (0 $$00 $$0) (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
DD
RFA - 2
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
750 000 $750 000 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
G
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
3 févr. 2022 à 1 h 22
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2018
Messages: 15,600
Mentions "j'aime": 6,480
Montreal does not have the cap space for that
LetsGoPens69 a aimé ceci.
3 févr. 2022 à 1 h 33
#2
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2019
Messages: 4,986
Mentions "j'aime": 2,356
If Hawks trade Kubalik elsewhere, then Id consider a trade for MAF 50% retained + Gus for Kap + DeSmith
LetsGoPens69 a aimé ceci.
3 févr. 2022 à 1 h 36
#3
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2021
Messages: 2,391
Mentions "j'aime": 554
Modifié 3 févr. 2022 à 1 h 42
Quoting: Campabee
Montreal does not have the cap space for that


Ya, maybe if Petry is traded for a prospect and pick like rumors say. Say he wants out of Montreal too.

The good thing about Zucker is his term. It’s up at the end of next season. Maybe the Pens retain 1M and its Zucker at 4.5M. Zucker @4.5M for 1 more season looks alot better.

And Zucker could be flipped to a contender too. Especially next season on an expiring deal.
3 févr. 2022 à 1 h 38
#4
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2021
Messages: 2,391
Mentions "j'aime": 554
Modifié 3 févr. 2022 à 1 h 47
Quoting: Aussie_Blackhawk
If Hawks trade Kubalik elsewhere, then Id consider a trade for MAF 50% retained + Gus for Kap + DeSmith


Ya, IMO, I doubt the Pens would trade Kappy for 2 expiring contracts/rentals(MAF and Gus). I would imagine they would want a pick or prospect back if it was Kappy and DeSmith for MAF(50% retention). And Gustafsson isn’t it..lol.
3 févr. 2022 à 1 h 45
#5
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2019
Messages: 4,986
Mentions "j'aime": 2,356
Quoting: LetsGoPens69
Ya, I doubt the Pens would trade Kappy for 2 expiring contracts/ rentals(MAF and Gus). I would imagine they would want a pick or prospect back if it was Kappy for MAF(50% retention).


I don't think we'd be prepared to part with Mitchell. Perhaps an LD prospect due to our abundance of them, however I'm presuming most teams have a lot of LD prospects.
LetsGoPens69 a aimé ceci.
3 févr. 2022 à 1 h 48
#6
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2018
Messages: 15,600
Mentions "j'aime": 6,480
Quoting: LetsGoPens69
Ya, maybe if Petry is traded for a prospect and pick like rumors say. Say he wants out of Montreal too.

The good thing about Zucker is his term. It’s up at the end of next season. Maybe the Pens retain 1M and its Zucker at 4.5M. Zucker 4.5M for 1 more season looks alot better.

And Zucker could be flipped to a contender too. Especially next season on an expiring deal.


TBH, I don't think Petry will be traded until at least the offseason if even then. I think IF Petry is traded it will be at next TDL. His value is still high but with the season he has had thus far he needs to produce the rest of the way if he wants to be traded in the off season.
LetsGoPens69 a aimé ceci.
3 févr. 2022 à 1 h 56
#7
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2021
Messages: 2,391
Mentions "j'aime": 554
Quoting: Aussie_Blackhawk
I don't think we'd be prepared to part with Mitchell. Perhaps an LD prospect due to our abundance of them, however I'm presuming most teams have a lot of LD prospects.


Ya, I just saw the Blackhawks have both Seth Jones and Connor Murphy signed long term at RHD. I was thinking Mitchell or Regula. Obviously if it was up to me it would be Mitchell..lol. It’s why I threw in Friedman as well. Cheap 3rd pairing RHD option.

Either way, .0000000000000001 % chance any trade on here really happens. But I was trying to make something fair.

Like I said, I don’t think MAF(50% retention) and Gus(two expiring contracts) is enough for Kappy/DeSmith (DeSmith being an expiring deal as well). It why I threw in Freidman too.

Ohh well, I wouldn’t mind Zucker, DeSmith and Friedman for MAF(50% retention) and Gustafsson.
Aussie_Blackhawk a aimé ceci.
3 févr. 2022 à 2 h 3
#8
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2019
Messages: 4,986
Mentions "j'aime": 2,356
Quoting: LetsGoPens69
Ya, I just saw the Blackhawks have both Seth Jones and Connor Murphy signed long term at RHD. I was thinking Mitchell or Regula. Obviously if it was up to me it would be Mitchell..lol. It’s why I threw in Friedman as well. Cheap 3rd pairing RHD option.

Either way, .0000000000000001 % chance any trade on here really happens. But I was trying to make something fair.

Like I said, I don’t think MAF(50% retention) and Gus(two expiring contracts) is enough for Kappy/DeSmith (DeSmith being an expiring deal as well). It why I threw in Freidman too.

Ohh well, I wouldn’t mind Zucker, DeSmith and Friedman for MAF(50% retention) and Gustafsson.


Yeah thats not something we would be interested in, not just for the cap reasons. Kap was a good option due to his RFA status and he's still young, that was the enticing part to the trade otherwise we would likely just move MAF 50% for a 1st/2nd pick trade package
3 févr. 2022 à 2 h 4
#9
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2021
Messages: 2,391
Mentions "j'aime": 554
Modifié 3 févr. 2022 à 2 h 10
Quoting: Campabee
TBH, I don't think Petry will be traded until at least the offseason if even then. I think IF Petry is traded it will be at next TDL. His value is still high but with the season he has had thus far he needs to produce the rest of the way if he wants to be traded in the off season.


Ya, his value is still high even with the down season. I just read he wants out of Montreal. Isn’t happy. And reports say Montreal wants a top prospect and 2nd. Doenst seem too steep and unrealistic ask to me.

But ya, I would lean towards not being traded as well. It’s less likely any players get traded in the NHL with long term deals.

https://pittsburghhockeynow.com/nhl-trade-bait-jeff-petry-perfect-fit-pittsburgh-penguins-kris-letang-ron-hextall/
3 févr. 2022 à 2 h 5
#10
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2021
Messages: 2,391
Mentions "j'aime": 554
Modifié 3 févr. 2022 à 2 h 36
Quoting: Aussie_Blackhawk
Yeah thats not something we would be interested in, not just for the cap reasons. Kap was a good option due to his RFA status and he's still young, that was the enticing part to the trade otherwise we would likely just move MAF 50% for a 1st/2nd pick trade package



In your opinion it’s not something you’d be interested in..lol. I don’t think it’s your choice my man. Or mine for that matter. I always try to say “in my opinion/IMO” though. Or “I don’t think they’d be interested”.

If Chicago gets a 1st or 2nd for Fluery and retention, that would be a great get. Good luck..!! I hope you do get it.

Not a lot of teams/contenders have 3.5M in cap room for a backup or 1A/1B goalie though. Most all contenders have their stud goalie. And he’s having a down year. And he has a NTC. He’s not gonna go many places.
3 févr. 2022 à 17 h 54
#11
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2019
Messages: 4,986
Mentions "j'aime": 2,356
Quoting: LetsGoPens69
In your opinion it’s not something you’d be interested in..lol. I don’t think it’s your choice my man. Or mine for that matter. I always try to say “in my opinion/IMO” though. Or “I don’t think they’d be interested”.

If Chicago gets a 1st or 2nd for Fluery and retention, that would be a great get. Good luck..!! I hope you do get it.

Not a lot of teams/contenders have 3.5M in cap room for a backup or 1A/1B goalie though. Most all contenders have their stud goalie. And he’s having a down year. And he has a NTC. He’s not gonna go many places.


LTIR teams would have the space, plus to get a quality net minder teams will find a way if they need IMO.

Lehner got a 2nd + 2 prospects. Even if MAF fetches the same return I think we would be happy. He will be arguably the top goalie on the market and if there are teams that he would be okay to go to that are interested then the price will be determined from there.
LetsGoPens69 a aimé ceci.
7 févr. 2022 à 6 h 42
#12
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2021
Messages: 2,391
Mentions "j'aime": 554
Quoting: Aussie_Blackhawk
LTIR teams would have the space, plus to get a quality net minder teams will find a way if they need IMO.

Lehner got a 2nd + 2 prospects. Even if MAF fetches the same return I think we would be happy. He will be arguably the top goalie on the market and if there are teams that he would be okay to go to that are interested then the price will be determined from there.


What about his NTC?? He has to ok the team.

Plus a team having atleast 3.5M in cap space for their 1A/1B or back-up goalie. Maybe like u said, a team with a player on LTIR out until the play-offs. But you still have the NTC. I don’t see many contending teams fitting MAF without moving a contract back. And that’s with Chicago retaining 50.% salary. And MAF waiving his NTC.

I guess well see. My guess is a 2nd and a prospect( a B, B- prospect) at best.
Aussie_Blackhawk a aimé ceci.
7 févr. 2022 à 18 h 5
#13
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2019
Messages: 4,986
Mentions "j'aime": 2,356
Quoting: LetsGoPens69
What about his NTC?? He has to ok the team.

Plus a team having atleast 3.5M in cap space for their 1A/1B or back-up goalie. Maybe like u said, a team with a player on LTIR out until the play-offs. But you still have the NTC. I don’t see many contending teams fitting MAF without moving a contract back. And that’s with Chicago retaining 50.% salary. And MAF waiving his NTC.

I guess well see. My guess is a 2nd and a prospect( a B, B- prospect) at best.


Yes I agree, that is what it will come down to ultimately. He will get to decide his future and he has deserved the right to be able to do that after the wonderful service he has given to the NHL.
LetsGoPens69 a aimé ceci.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage