SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Keeping Hertl

Créé par: glarson17
Équipe: 2022-23 Sharks de San Jose
Date de création initiale: 18 janv. 2022
Publié: 18 janv. 2022
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
Say the cap doesn’t rise the $1 mil with all the stoppages. Sharks decide to wait a year to buy out Vlasic to get a more favorable buyout. This is a more conservative option for the sharks going into next year.
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
LISTE DE RÉSERVEANSCAP HIT
3900 000 $
RFAANSCAP HIT
22 500 000 $
23 500 000 $
11 000 000 $
1900 000 $
1750 000 $
1750 000 $
1750 000 $
1750 000 $
1950 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
58 500 000 $
33 000 000 $
1750 000 $
Transactions
1.
SJS
  1. Choix de 7e ronde en 2022 (OTT)
2.
SJS
  1. Choix de 5e ronde en 2023 (NYI)
NYI
  1. Knyzhov, Nikolai [Droits de RFA]
3.
SJS
  1. Choix de 5e ronde en 2023 (TOR)
4.
SJS
  1. Choix de 6e ronde en 2022 (ARI)
ARI
  1. Simek, Radim
  2. Choix de 5e ronde en 2022 (BUF)
Rachats de contrats
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2022
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de ARI
Logo de SJS
Logo de ARI
Logo de MIN
Logo de OTT
2023
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de NYI
Logo de TOR
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
2024
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2381 500 000 $71 971 667 $0 $382 500 $9 528 333 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
894 167 $894 167 $
AG
RFA - 4
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
8 500 000 $8 500 000 $
C
UFA - 8
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
2 500 000 $2 500 000 $
AG, AD
UFA
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
8 000 000 $8 000 000 $
C
M-NTC
UFA - 5
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
750 000 $750 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
900 000 $900 000 $
C, AG
RFA - 2
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
4 725 000 $4 725 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
1 025 000 $1 025 000 $
C, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
950 000 $950 000 $
AG, AD
RFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
900 000 $900 000 $
AD, C
UFA
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
DG
UFA - 3
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
10 000 000 $10 000 000 $
DD
NMC
UFA - 5
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
2 250 000 $2 250 000 $
G
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
DG
UFA - 4
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
5 280 000 $5 280 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
2 175 000 $2 175 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
750 000 $750 000 $
DG
UFA - 2
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance300 000 $$300K)
DD
UFA - 1
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
750 000 $750 000 $
AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
842 500 $842 500 $ (Bonis de performance82 500 $$82K)
C
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
7 000 000 $7 000 000 $
DG/DD
NMC
UFA - 4

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
19 janv. 2022 à 0 h 9
#26
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2021
Messages: 14,017
Mentions "j'aime": 4,585
Quoting: Rob32sjsharks
He does seem to disappear when legit stats come up to counter his feelings.

plus what’s wrong with saying “we” as a teams fan?


When did i disappear? I countered every one of your points with logic and evidence.
19 janv. 2022 à 0 h 24
#27
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 8,181
Mentions "j'aime": 3,661
Quoting: Rob32sjsharks
He does seem to disappear when legit stats come up to counter his feelings.

plus what’s wrong with saying “we” as a teams fan?


Nothing is wrong with it
19 janv. 2022 à 0 h 25
#28
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2020
Messages: 11,250
Mentions "j'aime": 4,677
Quoting: CMcAvoy73
When did i disappear? I countered every one of your points with logic and evidence.


no you didn’t, you just argued using opinion and a few random things to make my argument look like it holds no value.

for instance belittling Bordeleau saying he’s 6th in scoring with Michigan, but you forgot to mention they have 7 1st round picks on their team and Bordeleau is outpacing or holding ground with all of them!
19 janv. 2022 à 17 h 50
#29
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2021
Messages: 14,017
Mentions "j'aime": 4,585
Quoting: Rob32sjsharks
no you didn’t, you just argued using opinion and a few random things to make my argument look like it holds no value.

for instance belittling Bordeleau saying he’s 6th in scoring with Michigan, but you forgot to mention they have 7 1st round picks on their team and Bordeleau is outpacing or holding ground with all of them!


None of what i used was opinion. It was all based in fact. Now, I’ll concede, there’s a chance that you’re right about everything here. Maybe the sharks are in great shape and all these prospects are going to be hall of famers some day. But can you see how from the outside, it kind of looks like homerism?
Hertl is elite! Well the evidence doesn’t really show that. He’s a good player, and he’s having a great season, but he’s only had one 50 point season, only one 30 goal season (same year), never gotten any award votes, not in the top 50 for points per games over the last 4 seasons, never lead his team in points, only one top 50 in goals or points over that stretch. I could go on and on.
But he’s going to get this unprecedented return you say. Why, everyone asks, thats never happened before? Because I want it to!
The last two years of drafts were awesome!!!! Even though no ones really impacted the NHL yet, and there’s no way to have any clue.

Just seems like you manage to spin everything into a great situation for the sharks
In reality deadline returns aren’t usually unprecedented, most 2nd round picks in the NCAA don’t wind up being impact players, and there’s way too many players that outpace Hertl offensively, and are better defensively for him to be elite.
19 janv. 2022 à 18 h 24
#30
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2020
Messages: 11,250
Mentions "j'aime": 4,677
Quoting: CMcAvoy73
None of what i used was opinion. It was all based in fact. Now, I’ll concede, there’s a chance that you’re right about everything here. Maybe the sharks are in great shape and all these prospects are going to be hall of famers some day. But can you see how from the outside, it kind of looks like homerism?
Hertl is elite! Well the evidence doesn’t really show that. He’s a good player, and he’s having a great season, but he’s only had one 50 point season, only one 30 goal season (same year), never gotten any award votes, not in the top 50 for points per games over the last 4 seasons, never lead his team in points, only one top 50 in goals or points over that stretch. I could go on and on.
But he’s going to get this unprecedented return you say. Why, everyone asks, thats never happened before? Because I want it to!
The last two years of drafts were awesome!!!! Even though no ones really impacted the NHL yet, and there’s no way to have any clue.

Just seems like you manage to spin everything into a great situation for the sharks
In reality deadline returns aren’t usually unprecedented, most 2nd round picks in the NCAA don’t wind up being impact players, and there’s way too many players that outpace Hertl offensively, and are better defensively for him to be elite.


never said HOF draft class,
by by all scouting takes the sharks have added a ton of quality talent in the last 2 drafts, but your right we are still 2-3 years from them making a serious impact at the NHL level and that’s when the we will see the truth.
i did say 1-2 very easily could be allstar caliber and 4-5 will be top 6/middle 6 guys
the only guy who could be a potential HOF is Eklund and even that’s a reach.
i have high hopes for my teams prospect so does every fan.
i also understand of the 6-8 guys i am high on if 4 make a substantial contribution to the team ( .5 ppg) i would be overjoyed.
i am not expecting a Crosby or McDavid from the sharks prospect pool, i am hoping for players similar to toffoli or strome or Kerfoot, or Goodrow out of our prospects not named Eklund.
Hertl is Elite and you can’t change my mind.
however I think our definitions of elite differ and that could be the issue.
your definition of Elite i feel is HOF worthy player and yes Hertl is not a HOF worthy player.
my definition of elite is top 15 in each category in any given year (LW, C, RW, LD, RD G) and I don’t think you could find 15 C who are playing better than Hertl right now.

and to your argument about 2nd round players, yes only about 40-50% of 2-4th round players ever play a game in the NHL and only about 15-20% are ever impactful players and maybe 2-3% ever wind up Elite or HOF status (if not less)
but the players the sharks picked in 2020 have all progressed really well and have shown NHL caliber skill. but that does not mean they will be NHL high caliber guys.

to me the sharks have 1 Prospects who i see making top line elite status (Eklund) and a few i see making it to the top 6 or at the very least middle 6 Bordeleau Coe and Robins. Weisblat Gushin could end up middle 6 to bottom 6
Reedy and Raska look like solid bottom 6 guys who could surprise.
excluding Eklund i would be shocked if we get more than 1-2 30 goal seasons and any more than 4-5 60+ point seasons from
any of those guys. but 30-50 point seasons from depth players is the difference between fringe playoff team and cup contender.
19 janv. 2022 à 18 h 55
#31
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2021
Messages: 14,017
Mentions "j'aime": 4,585
Quoting: Rob32sjsharks
never said HOF draft class,
by by all scouting takes the sharks have added a ton of quality talent in the last 2 drafts, but your right we are still 2-3 years from them making a serious impact at the NHL level and that’s when the we will see the truth.
i did say 1-2 very easily could be allstar caliber and 4-5 will be top 6/middle 6 guys
the only guy who could be a potential HOF is Eklund and even that’s a reach.
i have high hopes for my teams prospect so does every fan.
i also understand of the 6-8 guys i am high on if 4 make a substantial contribution to the team ( .5 ppg) i would be overjoyed.
i am not expecting a Crosby or McDavid from the sharks prospect pool, i am hoping for players similar to toffoli or strome or Kerfoot, or Goodrow out of our prospects not named Eklund.
Hertl is Elite and you can’t change my mind.
however I think our definitions of elite differ and that could be the issue.
your definition of Elite i feel is HOF worthy player and yes Hertl is not a HOF worthy player.
my definition of elite is top 15 in each category in any given year (LW, C, RW, LD, RD G) and I don’t think you could find 15 C who are playing better than Hertl right now.

and to your argument about 2nd round players, yes only about 40-50% of 2-4th round players ever play a game in the NHL and only about 15-20% are ever impactful players and maybe 2-3% ever wind up Elite or HOF status (if not less)
but the players the sharks picked in 2020 have all progressed really well and have shown NHL caliber skill. but that does not mean they will be NHL high caliber guys.

to me the sharks have 1 Prospects who i see making top line elite status (Eklund) and a few i see making it to the top 6 or at the very least middle 6 Bordeleau Coe and Robins. Weisblat Gushin could end up middle 6 to bottom 6
Reedy and Raska look like solid bottom 6 guys who could surprise.
excluding Eklund i would be shocked if we get more than 1-2 30 goal seasons and any more than 4-5 60+ point seasons from
any of those guys. but 30-50 point seasons from depth players is the difference between fringe playoff team and cup contender.


I certainly don’t think HOF caliber is needed to be elite. Let’s go with top 15 at position. I think that’s a little light, but so be it. Hertl is 23rd in scoring over the last four seasons (i know he’s on a pace better than this year, but he’s still only 18th), and I think there are guys behind him that are better. Eichel and Malkin have missed time due to injury. I think Hertl is like 25th or something in terms of points per game over that stretch. He’s very good, but not elite. He’s a bad teams number 1, and a good teams number 2.

The prospect hope is still a bit of a reach. Chances are two of those guys make it. Every team can have high hopes on their prospects, because they tend to be the top end guys in the lower leagues. Lysell is probably the bruins top prospect. Everything about him points to him being really good. Guess what? He’s probably not going to be a good NHL player. Christ, I remember bruins fans saying that Jesse Gabrielle couldn’t be traded because he was too good after exploding in junior. Now he’s in the Australian league. Hockeydb doesn’t even register that league. That’s just the nature of prospects. I’m sure Canes fans thought Jake Bean was the next big thing. He sucked. Don Sweeney wanted to take Fabbro over McAvoy. Thank god he didn’t. The vast majority of highly touted prospects just don’t make it, so what I find crazy is when you say, these guys WILL make it. It’s just silly.
19 janv. 2022 à 20 h 4
#32
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2020
Messages: 2,686
Mentions "j'aime": 1,219
Kny is worth more than a 5th. No need at all to move him though.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage