SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Center Upgrades

Créé par: Pikey_777
Équipe: 2021-22 Flames de Calgary
Date de création initiale: 11 janv. 2022
Publié: 14 janv. 2022
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
Playing with some ideas and I’m interested how the other teams fans see the trades
Transactions
1.
SJS
  1. Backlund, Mikael
  2. Zary, Connor
  3. Choix de 2e ronde en 2022 (CGY)
Détails additionnels:
Not sure if this would cut it, but a Blue Chip Prospect and a 2nd is nothing for a potential rental
2.
MTL
  1. Monahan, Sean
  2. Poirier, Jérémie
  3. Choix de 2e ronde en 2022 (FLA)
Détails additionnels:
Again, not sure if it’s enough. Poirier looks to be trending in the right direction, and the 2nd offsets the salary difference
3.
CGY
  1. Chychrun, Jakob
Détails additionnels:
This is wishful thinking, but would love to see him in Calgary
ARI
  1. Mackey, Connor
  2. Phillips, Matthew
  3. Zadorov, Nikita
  4. Choix de 1e ronde en 2023 (CGY)
  5. Choix de 2e ronde en 2023 (CGY)
Détails additionnels:
Two very good prospects, who are close to NHL ready, plus bolsters draft picks for next year.
Rachats de contrats
Enfoui
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2022
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
2023
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
2024
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2081 500 000 $69 789 166 $0 $15 000 $11 710 834 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Flames de Calgary
6 750 000 $6 750 000 $
AG
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
5 625 000 $5 625 000 $
C
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
4 850 000 $4 850 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 3
Logo de Flames de Calgary
2 425 000 $2 425 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
4 450 000 $4 450 000 $
C
UFA - 4
Logo de Flames de Calgary
7 000 000 $7 000 000 $
AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
5 250 000 $5 250 000 $
AG, AD
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 2
Logo de Flames de Calgary
2 300 000 $2 300 000 $
AG, AD, C
RFA - 3
Logo de Flames de Calgary
4 900 000 $4 900 000 $
AD, AG
NTC
UFA - 6
Logo de Flames de Calgary
800 000 $800 000 $
AD, C
UFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
801 666 $801 666 $ (Bonis de performance15 000 $$15K)
AG, C
UFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
1 750 000 $1 750 000 $
AD
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Coyotes de l'Arizona
4 600 000 $4 600 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 4
Logo de Flames de Calgary
4 550 000 $4 550 000 $
DD
UFA - 5
Logo de Flames de Calgary
750 000 $750 000 $
G
UFA - 2
Logo de Flames de Calgary
1 237 500 $1 237 500 $
DG
UFA - 3
Logo de Flames de Calgary
1 125 000 $1 125 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Flames de Calgary
6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
G
NMC
UFA - 5
Logo de Flames de Calgary
750 000 $750 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
1 950 000 $1 950 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
Équipe de réserve
Logo de Flames de Calgary
750 000 $750 000 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
800 000 $800 000 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
C
UFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
900 000 $900 000 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
AD
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
15 janv. 2022 à 1 h 11
#26
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2020
Messages: 11,275
Mentions "j'aime": 4,680
Quoting: Ledge_And_Dairy
High profile =/= Blue chip prospect. Lets take NYR for example. They would probably have interest in Hertl. The return would probably be around Chytil and 1st. You might be able to convince them to move Nils but thats more because Schneider makes him expendable


chytil and a 1st is not appealing, NY would have to give up schneider and a 1st and that’s not happening, maybe 1st chytil and lundkvist. still that might be to steep a price
15 janv. 2022 à 2 h 28
#27
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 38,584
Mentions "j'aime": 19,708
Modifié 15 janv. 2022 à 2 h 50
Quoting: Rob32sjsharks
chytil and a 1st is not appealing, NY would have to give up schneider and a 1st and that’s not happening, maybe 1st chytil and lundkvist. still that might be to steep a price


I wish you luck with that but don't get your hopes up. This TDL has too many good rental options for there to be high demand. With retention you might get a 1st and Lundkvist
15 janv. 2022 à 3 h 10
#28
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2020
Messages: 11,275
Mentions "j'aime": 4,680
Quoting: Ledge_And_Dairy
I wish you luck with that but don't get your hopes up. This TDL has too many good rental options for there to be high demand. With retention you might get a 1st and Lundkvist


actually we won’t get anything, sharks are working on Hertl extension, should be done soon.
15 janv. 2022 à 3 h 35
#29
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 38,584
Mentions "j'aime": 19,708
Quoting: Rob32sjsharks
actually we won’t get anything, sharks are working on Hertl extension, should be done soon.


Working on an extension and actual confirmed signings are 2 different things. So no reason to throw out all speculation
15 janv. 2022 à 11 h 24
#30
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2019
Messages: 8,796
Mentions "j'aime": 3,226
Quoting: Ledge_And_Dairy
High profile =/= Blue chip prospect. Lets take NYR for example. They would probably have interest in Hertl. The return would probably be around Chytil and 1st. You might be able to convince them to move Nils but thats more because Schneider makes him expendable


High profile to me = top 50 league wide prospect. You arent getting him for Chytil after this year
15 janv. 2022 à 12 h 16
#31
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 38,584
Mentions "j'aime": 19,708
Quoting: papishark
High profile to me = top 50 league wide prospect. You arent getting him for Chytil after this year


(Im not a Rangers fan, I was using them as an example). When was the last time a pending UFA returned a 1st and a top 50 prospect at the deadline?
15 janv. 2022 à 12 h 30
#32
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2020
Messages: 393
Mentions "j'aime": 46
Quoting: papishark
High profile to me = top 50 league wide prospect. You arent getting him for Chytil after this year


Mark Stone was traded as a potential Rental and signed his extension shortly there after and the return was Brannstrom (maybe a top 50 prospect at the time) and a 2nd.

Going back to the Flames, Zary and a 2nd is very reasonable. We would need to include salary going back (hence Backlund). If that is negative value to the sharks, I would consider moving the 2nd to a 1st, but that is a big return on a potential rental, whether he signs an extension or not is not part of the deal.
15 janv. 2022 à 14 h 15
#33
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2019
Messages: 8,796
Mentions "j'aime": 3,226
Quoting: Pikey_777
Mark Stone was traded as a potential Rental and signed his extension shortly there after and the return was Brannstrom (maybe a top 50 prospect at the time) and a 2nd.

Going back to the Flames, Zary and a 2nd is very reasonable. We would need to include salary going back (hence Backlund). If that is negative value to the sharks, I would consider moving the 2nd to a 1st, but that is a big return on a potential rental, whether he signs an extension or not is not part of the deal.


Brannstrom was like a top 20 prospect then. He is not good now but was very highly regarded then
15 janv. 2022 à 20 h 17
#34
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2018
Messages: 4,209
Mentions "j'aime": 1,010
Quoting: Rob32sjsharks
Karlsson did, the report from the sharks is and I will quote Doug Wilson here "it would have to be something ridiculous for us to consider trading Hert"


Would love to get Calgary's lottery bound 1st rounder for 2022
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage