SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Frustrating

Créé par: Goilersfan1215
Équipe: 2021-22 Oilers d'Edmonton
Date de création initiale: 3 janv. 2022
Publié: 3 janv. 2022
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
Not saying the Oilers would have been able to pull all this off but the constant shooting themselves in the foot makes it difficult to cheer for
Transactions
1.
EDM
  1. Jones, Caleb
  2. Choix de 3e ronde en 2022 (EDM)
2.
3.
EDM
CAR
  1. Shore, Devin
Détails additionnels:
Why? Why sign him for 2 years too
4.
EDM
CAR
  1. Barrie, Tyson
Détails additionnels:
Never needed to resign him with Evan Bouchard and Bear on the team
5.
STL
  1. Jones, Caleb
  2. Kassian, Zack
  3. Choix de 2e ronde en 2022 (EDM)
  4. Choix de 2e ronde en 2023 (EDM)
Détails additionnels:
This is a much better offer then what St Louis gave up
6.
MIN
    Oilers traded for him, then never offered him a contract
    7.
    CHI
    1. Smith, Mike
    Détails additionnels:
    MAF was traded away to anyone with cap space. Chicago would not have the space if Oilers didn’t take on Keith contract
    Rachats de contrats
    Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
    Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
    2022
    Logo de EDM
    Logo de EDM
    Logo de EDM
    Logo de EDM
    Logo de EDM
    2023
    Logo de EDM
    Logo de EDM
    Logo de EDM
    Logo de EDM
    Logo de EDM
    Logo de EDM
    2024
    Logo de EDM
    Logo de EDM
    Logo de EDM
    Logo de EDM
    Logo de EDM
    Logo de EDM
    Logo de EDM
    TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
    2381 500 000 $73 833 506 $669 339 $907 500 $7 666 494 $
    Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
    Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
    5 500 000 $5 500 000 $
    AD, AG
    NMC
    UFA - 7
    Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
    12 500 000 $12 500 000 $
    C
    UFA - 5
    Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
    1 175 000 $1 175 000 $
    AD
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Blues de St-Louis
    5 800 000 $5 800 000 $
    AG, AD, C
    UFA - 4
    Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
    8 500 000 $8 500 000 $
    C, AG
    UFA - 4
    Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
    1 175 000 $1 175 000 $
    AD
    RFA - 1
    Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
    750 000 $750 000 $
    AG, AD
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
    5 125 000 $5 125 000 $
    AG, C
    NMC
    UFA - 8
    Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
    750 000 $750 000 $
    AD, AG
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
    1 250 000 $1 250 000 $
    C, AD
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
    834 167 $834 167 $ (Bonis de performance57 500 $$58K)
    C
    RFA - 1
    Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
    750 000 $750 000 $
    C, AD
    UFA - 1
    Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
    Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
    5 600 000 $5 600 000 $
    DG
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Hurricanes de la Caroline
    2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
    DD
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
    3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
    G
    M-NTC
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Wild du Minnesota
    1 125 000 $1 125 000 $
    DG/DD
    M-NTC
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
    863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
    DD
    RFA - 2
    Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
    4 500 000 $4 500 000 $
    G
    M-NTC
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
    925 000 $925 000 $
    DG/DD
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
    3 250 000 $3 250 000 $
    DD
    UFA - 4
    Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
    Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
    725 000 $725 000 $
    DG/DD
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
    4 167 000 $4 167 000 $
    DG
    M-NTC
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
    750 000 $750 000 $
    AD, C
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
    1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
    AD, AG
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
    1 650 000 $1 650 000 $
    C, AD
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
    1 250 000 $1 250 000 $
    DG/DD
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
    785 000 $785 000 $
    G
    UFA - 1

    Code d'intégration

    • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
    • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

    Texte intégré

    Cliquer pour surligner
    3 janv. 2022 à 1 h 44
    #1
    Banni
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: mai 2018
    Messages: 4,892
    Mentions "j'aime": 3,372
    Losing out to Caigary on signing UFA Markstrom was a kick to the junk.
    3 janv. 2022 à 1 h 54
    #2
    Nuck Fan
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: sept. 2020
    Messages: 742
    Mentions "j'aime": 327
    This is a much better team.

    It's hard to say if that gets Buch because I think Drury had a hard-on for Blais (I think that's who went back?).

    Also, I think VGK probably sends Fleury out of division to someone like Az if he can't go to Chi.

    Even if those moved don't happen, now you've got 12m in cap space to leverage at the deadline or in UFA.
    3 janv. 2022 à 3 h 31
    #3
    Domme90
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: avr. 2021
    Messages: 67
    Mentions "j'aime": 25
    Blues dislike hard.
    3 janv. 2022 à 4 h 31
    #4
    Bootheblues
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: oct. 2021
    Messages: 1,532
    Mentions "j'aime": 438
    Blues trades a joke
    3 janv. 2022 à 10 h 52
    #5
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: janv. 2017
    Messages: 6,470
    Mentions "j'aime": 1,982
    How is that trade for Buch much better than what the Blues got? Kassian is a joke at 3.3 million, Jones wouldn't even be a top 7 defenseman on the Blues.
    3 janv. 2022 à 11 h 28
    #6
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: août 2020
    Messages: 1,752
    Mentions "j'aime": 986
    Quoting: Chopper02
    How is that trade for Buch much better than what the Blues got? Kassian is a joke at 3.3 million, Jones wouldn't even be a top 7 defenseman on the Blues.


    That's the funny part, Jones wouldn't be heading to St. Louis in this reality. This offer would've been to beat out St. Louis' offer to NYR for Buch
    3 janv. 2022 à 11 h 28
    #7
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: août 2020
    Messages: 1,752
    Mentions "j'aime": 986
    Quoting: Chopper02
    How is that trade for Buch much better than what the Blues got? Kassian is a joke at 3.3 million, Jones wouldn't even be a top 7 defenseman on the Blues.


    That's the funny part, Jones wouldn't be heading to St. Louis in this reality. This offer would've been to beat out St. Louis' offer to NYR for Buch
    3 janv. 2022 à 12 h 6
    #8
    Démarrer sujet
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: janv. 2017
    Messages: 852
    Mentions "j'aime": 194
    Quoting: Chopper02
    How is that trade for Buch much better than what the Blues got? Kassian is a joke at 3.3 million, Jones wouldn't even be a top 7 defenseman on the Blues.


    This is what the Oilers would offer the Rangers for Buch
    2 second round picks a young defensemen and yeah Kassian isn’t a lot but he does add some toughness which the Rangers wanted this summer, is a lot more then what St Louis gave up for him
    3 janv. 2022 à 15 h 35
    #9
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: janv. 2017
    Messages: 6,470
    Mentions "j'aime": 1,982
    Quoting: Goilersfan1215
    This is what the Oilers would offer the Rangers for Buch
    2 second round picks a young defensemen and yeah Kassian isn’t a lot but he does add some toughness which the Rangers wanted this summer, is a lot more then what St Louis gave up for him


    Kassian has negative value and Jones is not close to Blais, nor would Jones be playing in New York. Adding a 2nd to make up for Kassian doesn't make the package better considering he's signed for 2 more years than Reaves. That's why they went out and got Reaves, toughness on a rental deal. Blais and a 2nd is a better deal in the immediate future and cap wise in the longer future.
     
    Répondre
    To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
    Question:
    Options:
    Ajouter une option
    Soumettre le sondage